DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Sax, 42 N.W.2d 680.

35 citing documents.

  • Richards v. Reiter 796 N.W.2d 509 Minn. 2011
  • Richards v. Reiter 796 N.W.2d 509 Minn. 2011
    The court relied on State v. Sax, 231 Minn. 1 , to support its decision.
  • Mower County Human Services Ex Rel. Garcia v. Graves 611 N.W.2d 386 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
  • Mower County Human Services Ex Rel. Garcia v. Graves 611 N.W.2d 386 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
    In State v. Sax, 231 Minn. 1 , the supreme court determined that a mother was privy to a paternity proceeding brought by the state even though she was not specifically named as a party.
  • Hall v. Lalli 977 P.2d 776 Ariz. 1999
  • Bunge v. Zachman 578 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
  • Bunge v. Zachman 578 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
    See State v. Sax, 231 Minn. 1, 3 , State v. Wiebke, 154 Minn. 61, 67 , 191 N.W.
  • Hall v. Lalli 952 P.2d 748 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
  • State v. Niska 499 N.W.2d 820 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • State v. Niska 499 N.W.2d 820 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
    § 257.52 (1990) (definition of parent/child relationship); State v. Sax, 231 Minn. 1, 7 , (purpose of parentage act is to put father in position as if child were legitimate and to benefit the mother, the child and the public).
  • Jevning v. Cichos 499 N.W.2d 515 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • Jevning v. Cichos 499 N.W.2d 515 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • Benson v. Hackbarth 481 N.W.2d 375 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
  • Benson v. Hackbarth 481 N.W.2d 375 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
    Through section 257.28, the legislature “authorized a lump sum settlement and provided the father with a method of relieving himself of future liability, both civil and criminal.” State v. Sax, 231 Minn. 1, 19
  • Johnson v. Hunter 447 N.W.2d 871 Minn. 1989
  • Johnson v. Hunter 447 N.W.2d 871 Minn. 1989
    See State v. Sax, 231 Minn. 1, 8 , -85 (1950) (mother is party to illegitimacy proceedings even if action is brought by state).
  • County of Anoka v. Richards 345 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • County of Anoka v. Richards 345 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    [692] 693 (Minn.[1933]), State v. Sax, [ 231 Minn. 1 ], [680] (Minn.1950).
  • Bill by and Through Bill v. Gossett 647 P.2d 649 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
  • State on Behalf of Forslund v. Bronson 305 N.W.2d 748 Minn. 1981
  • State on Behalf of Forslund v. Bronson 305 N.W.2d 748 Minn. 1981
    The plaintiff argues that the common law duty of the mother to support her illegiti *752 mate child was not abrogated by the passage of section 257.251 or its predecessors and that although this court has held that the paternity statute “completely supersedes the primitive common law rules with reference to illegitimate children and their fathers,” State v. Sax, 231 Minn. 1, 6-7 , it has not held that the entire support obligation was thereby transferred to the male parent.
  • Smith v. Bailen 258 N.W.2d 118 Minn. 1977
  • Smith v. Bailen 258 N.W.2d 118 Minn. 1977
    Nelson v. Nelson, 298 Minn. 438 , State v. Sax, 231 Minn. 1 , State v. Worthingham, 23 Minn. 528 (1877).
  • State v. Carmena 189 N.W.2d 191 Minn. 1971
  • State v. Carmena 189 N.W.2d 191 Minn. 1971
    See, also, Mr. Chief Justice Knutson’s dissent in State v. Sax, 231 Minn. 1, 22 , 42 N. W. (2d) 680, 692 .
  • State v. Tolberg 140 N.W.2d 845 Minn. 1966
  • State v. Tolberg 140 N.W.2d 845 Minn. 1966
    Simon v. District Court, 138 Minn. 77 , ; State v. Jeffrey, 188 Minn. 476 , ; State v. Sax, 231 Minn. 1, 4 , 42 N. W. (2d) 680, 682 , 18 A.L.R.
  • State v. Lender 124 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1963
  • State v. Lender 124 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1963
    1 State v. Jeffrey, 188 Minn. 476 , ; State v. Sax, 231 Minn. 1 , 42 N. W. (2d) 680 , 18 A. L. R. (2d) 929.
  • O'NEIL v. Dux 101 N.W.2d 588 Minn. 1960
  • O'NEIL v. Dux 101 N.W.2d 588 Minn. 1960
    4 Juster Bros. Inc. v. Christgau, 214 Minn. 108 , 7 N. W. (2d) 501 ; State v. Sax, 231 Minn. 1 , 42 N. W. (2d) 680 , 18 A. L. R. (2d) 929; Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. United States, 298 U. S. 349 , 56 S. Ct. 797 , 80 L. ed. 1209; cf. State ex rel.
  • State v. EAH 75 N.W.2d 195 Minn. 1956
  • State v. E. A. H. 75 N.W.2d 195 Minn. 1956
  • State v. EAH 75 N.W.2d 195 Minn. 1956
    Respondent recognizes the fact that this court held in State v. Sax, 231 Minn. 1, 4 , 42 N.W.
  • State v. E. A. H. 75 N.W.2d 195 Minn. 1956
    The defendant-respondent has moved that the appeal be dismissed on the ground that the complainant has no right to appeal in her capacity “ ‘as mother and natural guardian’ of her minor child, or otherwise, from the order of the trial court denying the State’s motion for a new trial.” Respondent recognizes the fact that this court held in State v. Sax, 231 Minn. 1, 4 , 42 N. W. (2d) 680, 682 , by a four-to-three decision, that the mother of a child in a paternity proceeding had a “definite perso