Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Howard v. Marchildon, 37 N.W.2d 833.

27 citing documents.

State of Minnesota by Smart Growth Minneapolis, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation v. City of ... 7 N.W.3d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota by Smart Growth Minneapolis, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation v. City of ... 7 N.W.3d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
601, 602 (Minn. 1934), (“Where a party having the burden of proof with respect to a particular issue fails to sustain such burden, decision as to such issue must go against him.”); Maher v. Duluth Yellow Cab Co., 215 N.W.
City of Waite Park, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
601, 602 (Minn. 1934), cited in State v. Curtis, 921 (“Where a party having the burden of proof with respect to a particular issue fails to sustain such burden, decision as to such issue must go against him.”); Maher v. Duluth Yellow Cab Co., 215 N.W.
Athena 2004, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State v. Curtis 921 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 2018
State v. Curtis 921 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 2018
See also Howard v. Marchildon , 228 Minn. 539 , , 836 (1949) ("Where a party having the burden of proof with respect to a particular issue fails to sustain such burden, decision as to such issue must go against him."); Maher v. Duluth Yellow Cab Co. , 172 Minn. 439 , 215 N.W.
Aanenson v. Engelson 124 N.W.2d 360 Minn. 1963
Aanenson v. Engelson 124 N.W.2d 360 Minn. 1963
4 § 169.15 provides in part: “No person shall drive a motor vehicle at such a slow speed as to impede or block the normal and reasonable movement of traffic except when reduced speed is necessary for safe operation or in compliance with law.” 5 See, Greene v. Mathiowetz, 212 Minn. 171 , 3 N. W. (2d) 97 ; Howard v. Marchildon, 228 Minn. 539 , 37 N. W. (2d) 833 ; Nash v. Christenson, 241 Minn. 164 , 62 N. W. (2d) 800 ; Satter v. Turner, 251 Minn. 1 , 86 N. W. (2d) 85 , 66 A. L. R. (2d) 1178; Lee v
Barclay v. O'DELL 123 N.W.2d 681 Minn. 1963
Barclay v. O'DELL 123 N.W.2d 681 Minn. 1963
10 Howard v. Marchildon, 228 Minn. 539, 547 , 37 N. W. (2d) 833, 838 ; Turnbloom v. Crichton, 189 Minn. 588, 590 , .
Yellow Manufacturing Acceptance Corp. v. Zimmerman 121 N.W.2d 586 Minn. 1963
Yellow Manufacturing Acceptance Corp. v. Zimmerman 121 N.W.2d 586 Minn. 1963
Howard v. Marchildon, 228 Minn. 539 , 37 N. W. (2d) 833 .
American Smelting & Refining Co. v. Wusich 375 P.2d 364 Ariz. 1962
Bush v. Havir 91 N.W.2d 784 Minn. 1958
Bush v. Havir 91 N.W.2d 784 Minn. 1958
We held in Howard v. Marchildon, 228 Minn. 539 , 37 N. W. (2d) 833 , that a violation of the Highway Traffic Regulation Act constituting prima facie evidence of contributory negligence is no defense unless it is found to constitute contributory negligence as a matter of fact and also unless such contributory negligence was a proximate cause of the harm for which r
Thelen v. Spilman 86 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 1957
Thelen v. Spilman 86 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 1957
3 Howard v. Marchildon, 228 Minn. 539, 545 , 37 N. W. (2d) 833, 837 .
Satter v. Turner 86 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1957
Satter v. Turner 86 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1957
Howard v. Maxchildon, 228 Minn. 539 , 37 N. W. (2d) 833 ; Nash v. Christenson, 241 Minn. 164 , 62 N. W. (2d) 800 .
Alex v. Jozelich 78 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1956
Alex v. Jozelich 78 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1956
Ryan v. Griffin, 241 Minn. 91 , 62 N. W. (2d) 504 ; Howard v. Marchildon, 228 Minn. 539 , 37 N. W. (2d) 833 ; Landeen v. DeJung, 219 Minn. 287 , 17 N. W. (2d) 648 .
Storbakken v. Soderberg 75 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 1956
Storbakken v. Soderberg 75 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 1956
Howard v. Marchildon, 228 Minn. 539 , 37 N. W. (2d) 833 ; 13 Dunnell, Dig.
Anderson v. Enfield 70 N.W.2d 409 Minn. 1955
Anderson v. Enfield 70 N.W.2d 409 Minn. 1955
Howard v. Marchildon, 228 Minn. 539 , 37 N. W. (2d) 833 ; Spencer v. Johnson, 203 Minn. 402 , ; Roach v. Roth, 156 Minn. 107 , ; Robertson v. Spitler, 153 Minn. 395 , .
Ristau v. Riley 41 N.W.2d 772 Minn. 1950
Ristau v. Riley 41 N.W.2d 772 Minn. 1950
Howard v. Marchildon, 228 Minn. 539 , 37 N. W. (2d) 833 .