DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bennett v. Johnson, 42 N.W.2d 44.

25 citing documents.

  • Estate of Peterson 579 N.W.2d 488 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
  • State of Ga. Ex Rel. Brooks v. Braswell 474 N.W.2d 346 Minn. 1991
  • State of Ga. Ex Rel. Brooks v. Braswell 474 N.W.2d 346 Minn. 1991
    Bennett v. Johnson, 230 Minn. 404 , Trickel v. Calvin, 230 Minn. 322 , Breslaw v. Breslaw, 229 Minn. 371 , LaFond v. Sczepanski, 273 Minn. 293 , LeRoy v. Figure Skating Club of Minneapolis, 281 Minn. 576 , Kottkes’ Bus Co. v. Hippie, 286 Minn
  • STATE, BY POLLUTION CONTROL AGCY. v. US Steel 240 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 1976
  • STATE, BY POLLUTION CONTROL AGCY. v. US Steel 240 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 1976
    3 See, Kloos v. Soo Line R. 282 Minn. 168 , LeRoy v. Figure Skating Club of Minneapolis, 281 Minn. 576 , Tryggeseth v. Norcross, 262 Minn. 440 , Bennett v. Johnson, 230 Minn. 404 , (holding nonappealable an order denying a motion to vacate an appealable order); Cohen v. Globe Business Sales, Inc. 282 Minn. 540 , Smith v. Illinois Cent.
  • Kloos v. Soo Line Railroad 163 N.W.2d 567 Minn. 1968
  • Kloos v. Soo Line Railroad 163 N.W.2d 567 Minn. 1968
    Co. 201 Minn. 225 , ; Trickel v. Calvin, 230 Minn. 322 , 41 N. W. (2d) 426 ; Bennett v. Johnson, 230 Minn. 404 , 42 N. W. (2d) 44 ; and, after the adoption of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 2 in Tryggeseth v. Norcross, 262 Minn. 440 , 115 N. W. (2d) 56 .
  • LeRoy v. Figure Skating Club of Minneapolis 162 N.W.2d 248 Minn. 1968
  • LeRoy v. Figure Skating Club of Minneapolis 162 N.W.2d 248 Minn. 1968
    City of Chaska v. Chaska Township, 271 Minn. 139 , 135 N. W. (2d) 195 ; Tryggeseth v. Norcross, 262 Minn. 440 , 115 N. W. (2d) 56 ; Bennett v. Johnson, 230 Minn. 404 , 42 N. W. (2d) 44 .
  • State Ex Rel. Walton v. Tahash 126 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 1964
  • State Ex Rel. Walton v. Tahash 126 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 1964
    1 Bennett v. Johnson, 230 Minn. 404, 411 , 42 N. W. (2d) 44, 49 ; State v. Alm, 261 Minn. 238 , 111 N. W. (2d) 517 .
  • Tryggeseth v. Norcross 115 N.W.2d 56 Minn. 1962
  • Tryggeseth v. Norcross 115 N.W.2d 56 Minn. 1962
    Bennett v. Johnson, 230 Minn. 404 , 42 N. W. (2d) 44 .
  • State v. Alm 111 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 1961
  • State v. Alm 111 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 1961
    The statutory appeal from the judgment being the exclusive method for reviewing an authorized judgment and correcting it if erroneous, the law does not permit another method of review by an appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate or modify the judgment.” Our decision in Bennett v. Johnson, 230 Minn. 404 , 42 N. W. (2d) 44 , reviewed our prior opinions on this question and concluded that the great weight of authority supported the rule that an order denying a motion to vacate an order whi
  • Favorite v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 91 N.W.2d 459 Minn. 1958
  • Favorite v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 91 N.W.2d 459 Minn. 1958
    1 Barrett v. Smith, 183 Minn. 431 , ; Kolb v. City of Minneapolis, 229 Minn. 483 , 40 N. W. (2d) 619 ; Bennett v. Johnson, 230 Minn. 404 , 42 N. W. (2d) 44 ; Burkholder v. Burkholder, 231 Minn. 285 , 43 N. W. (2d) 801 .
  • In re To Enlarge, County Ditch No. 27 45 N.W.2d 555 Minn. 1951
  • In re To Enlarge, County Ditch No. 27 45 N.W.2d 555 Minn. 1951
    Taking this view of the case, it is immaterial that the rule of Bennett v. Johnson, 230 Minn. 404 , 42 N. W. (2d) 44 , is applicable to the second appeal involved here, i. e., the appeal from the *336 order of the district court vacating its order to show cause and thereby denying appellant’s motion to vacate the order dismissing his appeal from the order of the county board.
  • Burkholder v. Burkholder 43 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 1950
  • Burkholder v. Burkholder 43 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 1950
    Barrett v. Smith, 183 Minn. 431 , ; Kolb v. City of Minneapolis, 229 Minn. 483 , 40 N. W. (2d) 619 ; Bennett v. Johnson, 230 Minn. 404 , 42 N. W. (2d) 44 .
  • Weckerling v. McNiven Land Co. 42 N.W.2d 701 Minn. 1950
  • Weckerling v. McNiven Land Co. 42 N.W.2d 701 Minn. 1950
    5 For excellent discussion — and overruling — of certain prior decisions with respect to appealability of orders denying a vacation of prior appealable orders, see Bennett v. Johnson, 230 Minn. 404 , 42 N. W. (2d) 44 .
  • Bennett v. Bennett 42 N.W.2d 39 Minn. 1950
  • Bennett v. Bennett 42 N.W.2d 39 Minn. 1950
    The subject matter of this litigation constituted their homestead at the time they lived together and involves the same property as that involved in Bennett v. Johnson (No. 35,044) 230 Minn. 404 , 42 N. W. (2d) 44 , filed herewith.