Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Dahlberg v. Young, 42 N.W.2d 570.

57 citing documents.

Hegenes Properties, LLC v. Michelle Rodriguez, John Doe Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Minnesota appellate courts repeatedly state that the issue to be adjudicated in an eviction action is “the right to present possession.” see also Deutsche Bank Nat’l Tr.
Doris A. Seward v. Taylor Florin-Clemants, John Doe Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Doris A. Seward v. Taylor Florin-Clemants, John Doe Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Bradley J. Pass, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
An eviction action “merely determines the right to present possession.”
Brian Darr, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
3 D E C I S I O N An eviction action “merely determines the right to present possession.”
ATP Holdings, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
An eviction action “merely determines the right to present possession .” Dahlberg v. Young, 231 Minn. 60, 68, d.
Jerald Hammann v. Wells Fargo Bank, N. A., and Wells Fargo Bank N. A. v. Jeffrey Robert Busch, … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Jerald Hammann v. Wells Fargo Bank, N. A., and Wells Fargo Bank N. A. v. Jeffrey Robert Busch, … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Dahlberg v. Young, 231 Minn. 60, 63-64, -74 (1950).
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Shawn R. Dooling, Bruce Polikowsky v. Caeasar Investment, LLC, (Intervenor). Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Shawn R. Dooling, Bruce Polikowsky v. Caeasar Investment, LLC, (Intervenor). Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Dahlberg v. Young, 231 Minn. 60, 68
U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for the C-BASS Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-RP2 v. Timothy Knoedler, … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for the C-BASS Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-RP2 v. Timothy Knoedler, … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
An eviction action “merely determines the right to present possession and does not adjudicate the ultimate legal or equitable rights of ownership possessed by the parties.” Dahlberg v. Young, 231 Minn. 60, 68
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. Paul v. Pope, Gretchen A. Pope Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. Gary E. Mitchell, John Doe 862 N.W.2d 67 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. Gary E. Mitchell, John Doe 862 N.W.2d 67 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Since an eviction action “merely determines the right to present possession and does not adjudicate the ultimate legal or equitable rights of ownership possessed by the parties,” Dahlberg v. Young, 231 Minn. 60, 68, d 570, 576 (1950); cf. Deutsche Bank Nat’l (“Resolving a challenge to the validity of [a] foreclosed mortgage is not essential to an eviction action.”), their challenge to Freddie Mac’s legal capacity to bring an eviction action is meritless.
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. Paul v. Pope, Gretchen A. Pope Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Dahlberg v. Young, 231 Minn. 60, 68, (explaining an eviction action “merely determines the right to present possession and does not adjudicate the ultimate legal or equitable rights of ownership”); (holding counterclaims and defenses should only be considered if evict
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Julie Quale, John Doe Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Julie Quale, John Doe Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Dahlberg v. Young, 231 Minn. 60, 68
Amos Graves v. Michael Wayman, First Minnesota Bank 859 N.W.2d 791 Minn. 2015
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. Patricia G. Mikelson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. Patricia G. Mikelson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Dahlberg v. Young, 231 Minn. 60, 68
The Bank of New York Mellon formerly known as the Bank of New York, as Trustee v. Anthony … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
The Bank of New York Mellon formerly known as the Bank of New York, as Trustee v. Anthony … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
But an eviction proceeding “merely determines the right to present possession and does not adjudicate the ultimate legal or equitable rights of ownership possessed by the parties.” Dahlberg v. Young, 231 Minn. 60, 68, d 570, 576 (1950).
Great Southern Bank v. Gustavo Aguilar Guzman Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Great Southern Bank v. Gustavo Aguilar Guzman Minn. Ct. App. 2014
It is not a bar to an action involving the title.” Dahlberg v. Young, 231 Minn. 60, 68, see also Real Estate Equity Strategies, –58 (Minn. App. 2006) (stating that the summary nature of eviction 4 proceedings remains even though district courts have subject-matter jurisdiction to address ti
Federal National Mortgage Association v. Jeffrey D. Robinson, John Doe Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Federal National Mortgage Association v. Jeffrey D. Robinson, John Doe Minn. Ct. App. 2014
An eviction action “merely determines the right to present possession and does not adjudicate the ultimate legal or equitable rights of ownership possessed by the parties.” Dahlberg v. Young, 231 Minn. 60, 68
Real Estate Equity Strategies, LLC v. Jones 720 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Real Estate Equity Strategies, LLC v. Jones 720 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Indeed, a 1917 amendment of the statute governing the Minneapolis Municipal Courts granted them jurisdiction over unlawful-detainer proceedings “whether involving the title to real estate or not.” 1917 Minn. Laws ch. 407, §§ 1, 3 at 616; see Dahlberg v. Young, 231 Minn. 60, 64-68 , -576 (1950) (discussing 1917 amendment and stating “[t]he obvious purpose [of the amendment] was merely to extend the court’s jurisdiction in this type of action to cases involving disputes as to thé title, which disp
Fraser v. Fraser 642 N.W.2d 34 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Fraser v. Fraser 642 N.W.2d 34 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
See Fritz v. Warthen, 298 Minn. 54, 58-59 , -42 (1973) (discussing summary nature of unlawful detainer proceeding); Dahlberg v. Young, 231 Minn. 60, 65 , (stating “[a]n equitable matter which requires affirmative relief to make it a defense per se cannot be interposed in unlawful-detainer proceedings” (citation omitted)).
Walser Auto Sales, Inc. v. City of Richfield 635 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Walser Auto Sales, Inc. v. City of Richfield 635 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
The Minnesota Supreme Court has held that appositive phrases set off by commas should be construed to modify only the immediately preceding noun, pronoun, or clause, “unless it is clear that it *397 was intended to apply to subsequent matter.” Dahlberg v. Young, 231 Minn. 60, 66-67 , (emphasis omitted).
Eagan East Ltd. Partnership v. Powers Investigations, Inc. 554 N.W.2d 621 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Eagan East Ltd. Partnership v. Powers Investigations, Inc. 554 N.W.2d 621 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
University Community Properties, Inc. v. Norton, 311 Minn. 18, 21-22 , Dahlberg v. Young, 231 Minn. 60, 68 , William Weisman Holding Co. v. Miller, 152 Minn. 330, 332 , 188 N.W.
Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul v. Obermoller 429 N.W.2d 251 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul v. Obermoller 429 N.W.2d 251 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
(citing Dahlberg v. Young, 231 Minn. 60 , ).
Lanzo v. F & D MOTOR WORKS 396 N.W.2d 631 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Lanzo v. F & D MOTOR WORKS 396 N.W.2d 631 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Dahlberg v. Young, 231 Minn. 60, 67-68 , (emphasis added).
Thomey v. Stewart 391 N.W.2d 533 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Thomey v. Stewart 391 N.W.2d 533 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See Dahlberg v. Young, 231 Minn. 60
White Earth Housing Authority v. Schwabe 375 N.W.2d 568 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
White Earth Housing Authority v. Schwabe 375 N.W.2d 568 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Goldberg v. Fields, 247 Minn. 213, 215 , Dahlberg v. Young, 231 Minn. 60, 68
Case v. Wood 359 N.W.2d 64 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Case v. Wood 359 N.W.2d 64 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Dahlberg v. Young, 231 Minn. 60
Carlson v. Cohen 223 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1974
Carlson v. Cohen 223 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1974
See, also, Gallagher v. Moffet, 233 Minn. 330 , Dahlberg v. Young, 231 Minn. 60 , Colby v. Street, 146 Minn. 290 , for the theory that the municipal court has no jurisdiction to afford affirmative equitable relief and that therefore the enforcement of such claims should be sought in the district court.
Miller v. Benner 196 N.W.2d 293 Minn. 1972
Miller v. Benner 196 N.W.2d 293 Minn. 1972
1 See, also, Dahlberg v. Young, 231 Minn. 60 , Colby v. Street, 146 Minn. 290
Northwest Holding Co. v. Evanson 122 N.W.2d 596 Minn. 1963

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by