Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Nordling v. Ford Motor Co., 42 N.W.2d 576.

55 citing documents.

Phone Recovery Servs., LLC v. Qwest Corp. 919 N.W.2d 315 Minn. 2018
Nelson v. State 896 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Nelson v. State 896 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See Nordling v. Ford Motor Co., 231 Minn. 68, 76-77 , -82 (1950) (“It is a general rule that a liberal construction is usually accorded statutes which are regarded by courts as humanitarian or which are grounded on a humane public policy.”); Mattson v. Flynn, 216 Minn. 354, 361 , (“Pension and retirement acts are remedia
Buck v. Freeman 619 N.W.2d 793 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Taylor 594 N.W.2d 533 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Taylor 594 N.W.2d 533 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
See Nordling v. Ford Motor Co., 231 Minn. 68, 88
Associated Builders & Contractors v. Carlson 590 N.W.2d 130 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Associated Builders & Contractors v. Carlson 590 N.W.2d 130 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Nordling v. Ford Motor Co., 231 Minn. 68, 77
Current Technology Concepts, Inc. v. Irie Enterprises, Inc. 530 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 1995
Current Technology Concepts, Inc. v. Irie Enterprises, Inc. 530 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 1995
Nordling v. Ford Motor Co., 231 Minn. 68, 77
Beaver Creek Mutual Insurance Co. v. Commissioner of Jobs & Training 463 N.W.2d 535 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Beaver Creek Mutual Insurance Co. v. Commissioner of Jobs & Training 463 N.W.2d 535 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
(citing Nordling v. Ford Motor Co., 231 Minn. 68, 77 , ).
Lecy v. Sage Co. 460 N.W.2d 102 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Lecy v. Sage Co. 460 N.W.2d 102 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Nording v. Ford Motor Co., 231 Minn. 68, 76-77 , -82 (1950) (construing the unemployment compensation statute); see also Minn. Stat. § 363.11 (1988) (providing that the provisions in chapter 363 “shall be construed liberally for the accomplishment of the purposes thereof”).
Geo. A. Hormel & Co. v. Asper 428 N.W.2d 47 Minn. 1988
Geo. A. Hormel & Co. v. Asper 428 N.W.2d 47 Minn. 1988
Johnson v. Ford Motor Co., 289 Minn. 388, 394 , (citing Nordling v. Ford Motor Co., 231 Minn. 68, 76 , , 28 A.L.R.2d 272, 279 (1950)).
Lewis v. Commissioner of Jobs & Training 425 N.W.2d 309 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Lewis v. Commissioner of Jobs & Training 425 N.W.2d 309 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
§ 645.16 (1986); Nordling v. Ford Motor Co., 231 Minn. 68, 77 , (laws must be construed to give effect to the legislature’s intent).
Flores v. Department of Jobs & Training 411 N.W.2d 499 Minn. 1987
Flores v. Department of Jobs & Training 411 N.W.2d 499 Minn. 1987
Nordling v. Ford Motor Co., 231 Minn. 68, 76 , -82 (1950).
Minnesota Life & Health Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Department of Commerce 400 N.W.2d 769 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Minnesota Life & Health Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Department of Commerce 400 N.W.2d 769 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Nordling v. Ford Motor Co., 231 Minn. 68, 76-77 , -82 (1950) (citations omitted).
Petition of Oakgrove on Behalf of Oakgrove 371 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Petition of Oakgrove on Behalf of Oakgrove 371 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Nordling v. Ford Motor Co., 231 Minn. 68, 76-77 , -82 (1950) (citations omitted).
Stearns-Hotzfield v. Farmers Insurance Exchange 360 N.W.2d 384 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Stearns-Hotzfield v. Farmers Insurance Exchange 360 N.W.2d 384 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Nordling v. Ford Motor Co., 231 Minn. 68, 77
Hendrickson v. Northfield Cleaners 295 N.W.2d 384 Minn. 1980
Hendrickson v. Northfield Cleaners 295 N.W.2d 384 Minn. 1980
§ 268.03 (1978) that unemployment reserves be used “for the benefit of persons unemployed through no fault of their own.” See, e. g., Sajevic v. Greenbrier Home, Inc., 298 Minn. 574 , Swanson v. Minneapolis-Honeywell *386 Regulator Co., 240 Minn. 449 , Nordling v. Ford Motor Co., 231 Minn. 68
Tripp v. Alley Construction Company, Inc. 210 N.W.2d 668 Minn. 1973
Tripp v. Alley Construction Company, Inc. 210 N.W.2d 668 Minn. 1973
1 The purposes and policy of the statute have been fully discussed in Nordling v. Ford Motor Co. 231 Minn. 68 , Anson v. Fisher Amusement Corp. 254 Minn. 93 , Johnson v. Wilson & Co. 266 Minn. 500 , Adelsman v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 267 Minn. 116, 122 , Johnson v. Ford Motor Co. 289 Minn. 388, 393
Lehmann v. Western Airlines, Inc. 188 N.W.2d 883 Minn. 1971
Lehmann v. Western Airlines, Inc. 188 N.W.2d 883 Minn. 1971
1(5), we pointed out in Nord *10 ling v. Ford Motor Co. 231 Minn. 68, 74 , 42 N. W. (2d) 576, 580 , 28 A. L. R. (2d) 272, 278: “Minnesota is now one of nine states providing for a blanket disqualification in which the question of participation, financing, or interest in the strike or labor dispute has no further bearing upon the question of disqualification.” The foregoing view was ela
Johnson v. Ford Motor Company 184 N.W.2d 786 Minn. 1971
Johnson v. Ford Motor Company 184 N.W.2d 786 Minn. 1971
(c) The legislative intent with respect to the disqualifying provisions of § 268.17 is set forth in Nordling v. Ford Motor Co. 231 Minn. 68, 76 , 42 N. W. (2d) 576, 581 , 28 A. L. R. (2d) 272, 279, in which this court stated: “Unemployment compensation statutes were enacted during a period of distress and were designed to relieve the hardship caused by unemployment due to no fault of the employe.
Adelsman v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 125 N.W.2d 444 Minn. 1963
Adelsman v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 125 N.W.2d 444 Minn. 1963
2 *123 In Nordling v. Ford Motor Co. 231 Minn. 68, 76 , 42 N. W. (2d) 576, 581 , 28 A. L. R. (2d) 272, 279, we said: “Unemployment compensation statutes were enacted during a period of distress and were designed to relieve the hardship caused by unemployment due to no fault of the employe.
Easthagen v. Naugle-Leck, Inc. 109 N.W.2d 556 Minn. 1961
Easthagen v. Naugle-Leck, Inc. 109 N.W.2d 556 Minn. 1961
this court has held that the purpose of the act is to assist those who are unfortunate enough to be involuntarily unemployed, Di Re v. Central Livestock Order Buying Co. 246 Minn. 279 , 74 N. W. (2d) 518 ; that the act’s design is to relieve hardship caused by unemployment due to no fault of an employee, Anson v. Fisher Amusement Corp. 254 Minn. 93 , 93 N. W. (2d) 815 ; Nordling v. Ford Motor Co. 231 Minn. 68 , 42 N. W. (2d) 576 , 28 A. L. R. (2d) 272; that the provisions of § 268.09, subd.
Weiss v. Klein Super Markets, Inc. 108 N.W.2d 4 Minn. 1961
Weiss v. Klein Super Markets, Inc. 108 N.W.2d 4 Minn. 1961
The leading case on that phase of the unemployment compensation law involved here is Nordling v. Ford Motor Co. 231 Minn. 68 , 42 N. W. (2d) 576 , 28 A. L. R. (2d) 272.
Koll v. Egekvist Bakeries, Inc. 107 N.W.2d 373 Minn. 1961
Koll v. Egekvist Bakeries, Inc. 107 N.W.2d 373 Minn. 1961
It is also essential that “before such labor dispute can effectively disqualify it must be in progress at the establishment at which the claimant is or was employed.” Nordling v. Ford Motor Co. 231 Minn. 68, 76 , 42 N. W. (2d) 576, 581 , 28 A. L. R. (2d) 272.
Hessler v. American Television & Radio Co. 104 N.W.2d 876 Minn. 1960
Hessler v. American Television & Radio Co. 104 N.W.2d 876 Minn. 1960
We said in Nordling v. Ford Motor Co. 231 Minn. 68, 76 , 42 N. W. (2d) 576, 581 , 28 A. L. R. (2d) 272, 279, that: “It is true that our act contemplates compensation for those who are unemployed because of no fault of their own.” (Italics supplied.)
Capra v. Carpenter Paper Co. 104 N.W.2d 532 Minn. 1960
Capra v. Carpenter Paper Co. 104 N.W.2d 532 Minn. 1960
In Nordling v. Ford Motor Co. 231 Minn. 68 , 42 N. W. (2d) 576 , 28 A. L. R. (2d) 272, we had before us the narrow question of what is meant by the term “establishment” as used in our statute.
Bergseth v. Zinsmaster Baking Co. 89 N.W.2d 172 Minn. 1958
Bergseth v. Zinsmaster Baking Co. 89 N.W.2d 172 Minn. 1958
26 We do not overlook what we said in Nordling v. Ford Motor Co. 231 Minn. 68, 76 , 42 N. W. (2d) 576 , 581: “* * * The legislative purpose behind the enactment of our act is to be found in the legislative declaration of public policy, § 268.03.
Johnson v. LaGrange Shoe Corporation 70 N.W.2d 335 Minn. 1955
Johnson v. LaGrange Shoe Corporation 70 N.W.2d 335 Minn. 1955
In Nordling v. Ford Motor Co. 231 Minn. 68, 76 , 42 N. W. (2d) 576, 581 , 28 A. L. R. (2d) 272, we stated the rules applicable to construction of our unemployment laws to be as follows: “Unemployment compensation statutes were enacted during a period of distress and were designed to relieve the hardship caused by unemployment due to no fault of the employe.