DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Dose v. Yager, 42 N.W.2d 420.

29 citing documents.

  • Meurer v. Junkermeier 191 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1971
  • Distinguished Meurer v. Junkermeier 191 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1971
    In Dose v. Yager, 231 Minn. 90 , and Strandjord v. Exley, 287 Minn. 145 , the actions of both drivers in intersection collisions were held to be a proximate cause.
  • Seivert v. Bass 181 N.W.2d 888 Minn. 1970
  • Seivert v. Bass 181 N.W.2d 888 Minn. 1970
    In support of their contention they cite Dose v. Yager, 231 Minn. 90 , 42 N. W. (2d) 420 ; Neal v. Neal, 238 Minn. 292 , 56 N. W. (2d) 673 ; Schleuder v. Soltow, 239 Minn. 453 , 59 N. W. (2d) 320 ; and Tollefson v. Ehlers, 252 Minn. 370 , 90 N. W. (2d) 205 .
  • Strandjord v. Exley 177 N.W.2d 48 Minn. 1970
  • Strandjord v. Exley 177 N.W.2d 48 Minn. 1970
    283 Minn. 383 , 168 N. W. (2d) 327 ; Hill v. Wilmington Chemical Corp. 279 Minn. 336 , 156 N. W. (2d) 898 ; Sjaastad v. Dunsmore, 274 Minn. 50 , 142 N. W. (2d) 282 ; Haugen v. Dick Thayer Motor Co. 253 Minn. 199 , 91 N. W. (2d) 585 ; Dose v. Yager, 231 Minn. 90 , 42 N. W. (2d) 420 .
  • Fisher v. Edberg 176 N.W.2d 897 Minn. 1970
  • Fisher v. Edberg 176 N.W.2d 897 Minn. 1970
    It will be observed that in a somewhat analogous case, Dose v. Yager, 231 Minn. 90 , 42 N. W. (2d) 420 , involving an intersection protected by a stop sign, this court stated ( 231 Minn. 98 , 42 N. W. [2d] 426): “The right of a driver on a through highway to assume that another driver approaching on an intersecting highway will heed the stop sign is not absolute.
  • Fortier v. Ritter's Hairdressing Studios, Inc. 164 N.W.2d 897 Minn. 1969
  • Fortier v. Ritter's Hairdressing Studios, Inc. 164 N.W.2d 897 Minn. 1969
    Dose v. Yager, 231 Minn. 90 , 42 N. W. (2d) 420 .
  • Hentschel v. Smith 153 N.W.2d 199 Minn. 1967
  • Hentschel v. Smith 153 N.W.2d 199 Minn. 1967
    Dose v. Yager, 231 Minn. 90 , 42 N. W. (2d) 420 .
  • Schafer v. Pierce 150 N.W.2d 201 Minn. 1967
  • Schafer v. Pierce 150 N.W.2d 201 Minn. 1967
    169.20; Dose v. Yager, 231 Minn. 90 , 42 N. W. (2d) 420 ; Kunkel v. Paulson, 197 Minn. 107 , ; Johnston v. Selfe, 190 Minn. 269 , ; Lowery v. Clouse (8 Cir.) 348 F. (2d) 252.
  • Nelson v. Holand 139 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 1965
  • Nelson v. Holand 139 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 1965
    Dose v. Yager, 231 Minn. 90 , 42 N. W. (2d) 420 .
  • Burdick v. Bongard 96 N.W.2d 868 Minn. 1959
  • Burdick v. Bongard 96 N.W.2d 868 Minn. 1959
    1 Schleuder v. Soltow, 239 Minn. 453 , 59 N. W. (2d) 320 ; Leitner v. Pacific Gamble Robinson Co. 223 Minn. 260 , 26 N. W. (2d) 228 ; Dose v. Yager, 231 Minn. 90 , 42 N. W. (2d) 420 ; Norton v. Nelson, 236 Minn. 237 , 53 N. W. (2d) 31 .
  • Ballweber v. Kleist 78 N.W.2d 671 Minn. 1956
  • Ballweber v. Kleist 78 N.W.2d 671 Minn. 1956
    This court, however, in Dose v. Yager, 231 Minn. 90, 98 , 42 N. W. (2d) 420, 426 , said, “The statute requiring reduced speed at intersections bespeaks precaution, even from those having the right of way.” In Webber v. Seymour, supra, even though it was held that the driver of defendant’s car on the left was negligent as a matter of law, the issue of the contributory n
  • Storbakken v. Soderberg 75 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 1956
  • Storbakken v. Soderberg 75 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 1956
    5 We said in Dose v. Yager, 231 Minn. 90, 95 , 42 N. W. (2d) 420, 424 , in reference to the statutory requirement of reduced speed when approaching an intersection: “Obviously, this admonition applies with double force when the view at the intersection is partly obstructed.” It is, therefore, clear that, even under defendant’s view of the evidence, the jury
  • Schleuder v. Soltow 59 N.W.2d 320 Minn. 1953
  • Schleuder v. Soltow 59 N.W.2d 320 Minn. 1953
    Leitner v. Pacific Gamble Robinson Co. 223 Minn. 260 , 26 N. W. (2d) 228 ; Dose v. Yager, 231 Minn. 90 , 42 N. W. (2d) 420 ; Norton v. Nelson, 236 Minn. 237 , 53 N. W. (2d) 31 .
  • Neal v. Neal 56 N.W.2d 673 Minn. 1953
  • Neal v. Neal 56 N.W.2d 673 Minn. 1953
    But the inadvertent language appearing in these opinions was subsequently corrected in Dose v. Yager, 231 Minn. 90, 98 , 42 N. W. (2d) 420, 426 , where this court approved an instruction to the effect that the driver upon a highway which he knows to be protected by a stop sign may assume, until he sees or should see otherwise, that a driver approaching the intersection will respect the right of way of other vehicles which are appr
  • Norton v. Nelson 53 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 1952
  • Bunge v. Yager 52 N.W.2d 446 Minn. 1952
  • Bunge v. Yager 52 N.W.2d 446 Minn. 1952
    Dose v. Yager, 231 Minn. 90 , 42 N. W. (2d) 420 .