Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Blacktin v. McCarthy, 42 N.W.2d 818.

26 citing documents.

  • Salmen v. City of St. Paul 281 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1979
  • Salmen v. City of St. Paul 281 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1979
    *362 In arguing that these damages are inadequate, plaintiff relies principally on Walser v. Vinge, 275 Minn. 230 , Stacy v. Goff, 241 Minn. 301 , Blacktin v. McCarthy, 231 Minn. 303 , and Olson v. Christiansen, 230 Minn. 198
  • Schore v. Mueller 186 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 1971
  • Schore v. Mueller 186 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 1971
    Hurr v. Johnston, 242 Minn. 329 , 65 N. W. (2d) 193 ; Caswell v. Minar Motor Co. 240 Minn. 213 , 60 N. W. (2d) 263 ; Blacktin v. McCarthy, 231 Minn. 303 , 42 N. W. (2d) 818 .
  • Sessler v. Goldfarb 167 N.W.2d 11 Minn. 1969
  • Sessler v. Goldfarb 167 N.W.2d 11 Minn. 1969
    Caswell v. Minar Motor Co. 240 Minn. 213 , 60 N. W. (2d) 263 ; Blacktin v. McCarthy, 231 Minn. 303 , 42 N. W. (2d) 818 ; Hurr v. Johnston, 242 Minn. 329 , 65 N. W. (2d) 193 ; Krueger v. Knutson, 261 Minn. 144 , 111 N. W. (2d) 526 .
  • Josephson v. Fremont Industries, Inc. 163 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 1968
  • Josephson v. Fremont Industries, Inc. 163 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 1968
    Blacktin v. McCarthy, 231 Minn. 303 , 42 N. W. (2d) 818 .
  • Walser v. Vinge 146 N.W.2d 537 Minn. 1966
  • Walser v. Vinge 146 N.W.2d 537 Minn. 1966
    Blacktin v. McCarthy, 231 Minn. 303 , nd 818.
  • Prodger v. Zell 113 N.W.2d 168 Minn. 1962
  • Prodger v. Zell 113 N.W.2d 168 Minn. 1962
    Nor are Blacktin v. McCarthy, 231 Minn. 303 , 42 N. W. (2d) 818 , and Hurr v. Johnston, 242 Minn. 329 , 65 N. W. (2d) 193 , of *514 any help to defendant.
  • Seydel v. Reuber 94 N.W.2d 265 Minn. 1959
  • Seydel v. Reuber 94 N.W.2d 265 Minn. 1959
    Plaintiff contends that since there was clear evidence of defendant’s negligence and no appeal has been taken therefrom a new trial should be granted on the issue of damages alone, relying upon Blacktin v. McCarthy, 231 Minn. 303 , 42 N. W. (2d) 818 .
  • Fortier v. Newman 78 N.W.2d 382 Minn. 1956
  • Fortier v. Newman 78 N.W.2d 382 Minn. 1956
    Blacktin v. McCarthy, 231 Minn. 303 , 42 N. W. (2d) 818 .
  • LeMay v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 71 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 1955
  • LeMay v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 71 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 1955
    See, Blacktin v. Mc *200 Carthy, 231 Minn. 303 , 42 N. W. (2d) 818 .
  • Greenberg v. Holfeltz 69 N.W.2d 369 Minn. 1955
  • Greenberg v. Holfeltz 69 N.W.2d 369 Minn. 1955
    13 Blacktin v. McCarthy, 231 Minn. 303 , 42 N. W. (2d) 818 .
  • Hurr v. Johnston 65 N.W.2d 193 Minn. 1954
  • Hurr v. Johnston 65 N.W.2d 193 Minn. 1954
    Plaintiffs argue that, since there was clear evidence of defendant’s negligence, a new trial should be granted on the issue of damages alone because of inadequate damages, citing Blacktin v. McCarthy, 231 Minn. 303 , 42 N. W. (2d) 818 , and Hill v. Ross, 198 Minn. 199 , *336 , in support of this proposition.
  • Thiesen v. Hellermann 64 N.W.2d 762 Minn. 1954
  • Thiesen v. Hellermann 64 N.W.2d 762 Minn. 1954
    Blacktin v. McCarthy, 231 Minn. 303 , 42 N. W. (2d) 818 .
  • Caswell v. Minar Motor Co. 60 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 1953
  • Caswell v. Minar Motor Co. 60 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 1953
    Blacktin v. McCarthy, 231 Minn. 303 , 42 N. W. (2d) 818 ; Flaugh v. Egan Chevrolet, Inc. 202 Minn. 615 , .