Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Henderson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 43 N.W.2d 786.

35 citing documents.

Klapmeier v. Cirrus Industries, Inc. 900 N.W.2d 386 Minn. 2017
Klapmeier v. Cirrus Industries, Inc. 900 N.W.2d 386 Minn. 2017
Airlines, Inc., 231 Minn. 503 , (finding “no error” in taxing “the premium [for] the appeal bond”).
Minn. 2017
Airlines, Inc. , (taxing cost for bond premiums); see also Minn. R. Civ.
Melony Michaels v. First USA Title, LLC, Triad Title & Abstract, LLC, National Union Fire Insurance Company of … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Melony Michaels v. First USA Title, LLC, Triad Title & Abstract, LLC, National Union Fire Insurance Company of … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Airlines, 231 Minn. 503, 510
Lynch v. Hetman 559 N.W.2d 124 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Lynch v. Hetman 559 N.W.2d 124 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
We also construe the garnishment statute consistently with Minnesota’s policy favoring the garnishee, to protect “his rights as a neutral or unwilling litigant.” Henderson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 231 Minn. 503, 510 , -92 (1950); see Altman v. Levine & Tanz, Inc., 256 Minn. 48, 52
B & B Floor Covering Co. v. Country View Builders, Inc. 504 N.W.2d 272 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
B & B Floor Covering Co. v. Country View Builders, Inc. 504 N.W.2d 272 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
To support its position, (quoting Henderson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 231 Minn. 503, 507 , ) (emphasis in original), pet.
Johnson Motor Co., Inc. v. Cue 352 N.W.2d 114 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Johnson Motor Co., Inc. v. Cue 352 N.W.2d 114 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
The basic purpose of a garnishment proceeding is “to attach assets in the hands of a garnishee without in any manner impairing the rights of the garnishee or placing him thereby in a worse position than he would have been had he been sued directly by the defendant.” Henderson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 231 Minn. 503, 507
Holman v. General Ins. Co. of America 231 N.W.2d 81 Minn. 1975
Holman v. General Ins. Co. of America 231 N.W.2d 81 Minn. 1975
Henderson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 231 Minn. 503
Northwestern National Bank v. Delta Studios, Inc. 184 N.W.2d 3 Minn. 1971
Northwestern National Bank v. Delta Studios, Inc. 184 N.W.2d 3 Minn. 1971
That motion was denied, although in doing so the court stated that the garnishment was dismissed because Henderson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 231 Minn. 503 , 43 N. W. (2d) 786 , was controlling and because plaintiff had failed to comply with Minn. St.
State v. Gannons Inc. 145 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 1966
State v. Gannons Inc. 145 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 1966
[3] Henderson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 231 Minn. 503, 511 , ; Sanborn v. Webster, 2 Minn. 323 ( Gil.
State v. Gannons Inc. 145 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 1966
State v. Gannons Inc. 145 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 1966
Henderson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 231 Minn. 503, 511 , 43 N. W. (2d) 786, 792 ; Sanborn v. Webster, 2 Minn. 277 (323).
In re Arbitration Between Public Building Service & Hospital & Institutional Employees Union Local 113 133 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 1965
In re Arbitration Between Public Building Service & Hospital & Institutional Employees Union Local 113 133 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 1965
Sanborn v. Webster, 2 Minn. 277 (323); Henderson v. Northwest Airiines, Inc. 231 Minn. 503, 511 , 43 N. W. (2d) 786, 792 .” The following statement appears in 20 C. J. S., Costs, § 317: “Ordinarily, where appeEant or plaintiff in error dismisses an appeal or writ of.
State v. Robinson 123 N.W.2d 812 Minn. 1963
Sanitary Farm Dairies, Inc. v. Wolf 112 N.W.2d 42 Minn. 1961
Sanitary Farm Dairies, Inc. v. Wolf 112 N.W.2d 42 Minn. 1961
Sanborn v. Webster, 2 Minn. 277 (323); Henderson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 231 Minn. 503, 511 , 43 N. W. (2d) 786, 792 .
Altman v. LEVINE AND TANZ, INC. 97 N.W.2d 460 Minn. 1959
Altman v. LEVINE AND TANZ, INC. 97 N.W.2d 460 Minn. 1959
The Levine defendants contend that the issue raised is controlled by Henderson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 231 Minn. 503 , 43 N. W. (2d) 786 .
Inland Products Corp. v. Donovan Inc. 62 N.W.2d 211 Minn. 1953
Inland Products Corp. v. Donovan Inc. 62 N.W.2d 211 Minn. 1953
Paul v. Hetherington, 240 Minn. 298 , 61 N. W. (2d) 737 ; Propper v. C. R. I. & P. R. Co. 237 Minn. 386 , 54 N. W. (2d) 840 ; Krusemark v. Krusemark, 232 Minn. 416 , 46 N. W. (2d) 647 ; Henderson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 231 Minn. 503 , 43 N. W. (2d) 786 ; Allen v. Jones, 8 Minn. 172 (202).
Thayer v. Duffy 63 N.W.2d 28 Minn. 1953
City of Minneapolis v. Norman 57 N.W.2d 245 Minn. 1953
City of Minneapolis v. Norman 57 N.W.2d 245 Minn. 1953
Co. 74 Minn. 8 , ; Rendahl v. Hall, 160 Minn. 502 , ; Thwing v. McDonald, 139 Minn. 157 , ; Long v. Ryan, 203 Minn. 332 , ; Weiland v. Northwestern Distilleries, Inc. 203 Minn. 600 , ; Henderson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 231 Minn. 503 , 43 N. W. (2d) 786 .
Propper v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad 54 N.W.2d 840 Minn. 1952
Propper v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad 54 N.W.2d 840 Minn. 1952
Co. v. Verschingel, 197 Minn. 580, 589 , 710 ; Henderson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 231 Minn. 503, 511 , 43 N. W. (2d) 786, 792 ; Krusemark v. Krusemark, 232 Minn. 416, 421 , 46 N. W. (2d) 647, 651 .
Graf v. Montgomery Ward & Co. 49 N.W.2d 797 Minn. 1951
Graf v. Montgomery Ward & Co. 49 N.W.2d 797 Minn. 1951
In Henderson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 231 Minn. 503, 511 , 43 N. W. (2d) 786, 792 , involving an appeal from a district court order, this court said: “An appellant is the prevailing party if the judgment or order from which the appeal was taken is reversed or is modified.” We appear to have no dis *498 cretion under the act but to allow the prevailing party its disburs