Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Spaeth, 44 N.W.2d 440.

64 citing documents.

E. I. duPont de Nemours and Company & Subsidiaries, Relator v. Commissioner of Revenue Minn. 2025
E. I. duPont de Nemours and Company & Subsidiaries, Relator v. Commissioner of Revenue Minn. 2025
(standing for the principle that the “judicial construction of a statute, so long as it is unreversed, is as much a part thereof as if it had been written into it originally” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted)); Curtis v. Altria Group, Inc., (sam
Steve Quest v. Nicholas Robert Rekieta Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Steve Quest v. Nicholas Robert Rekieta Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(“The judicial construction of a statute, so long as it is unreversed, is as much a part thereof as if it had been written into it originally.” (quotation omitted)).
State of Minnesota v. Eloisa Rubi Plancarte Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Eloisa Rubi Plancarte Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(“The judicial construction of a statute, so long as it is unreversed, is as much a part thereof as if it had been written into it originally.” (quotation omitted)); (“We have recognized that when the legislature does not amend our construction o
Mark Schaefer v. Cargill Kitchen Solutions, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Mark Schaefer v. Cargill Kitchen Solutions, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Co. v. Spaeth, 232 Minn. 128, 131-32, -42 (1950).
State of Minnesota v. David Lee Haywood 869 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. David Lee Haywood 869 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Co. v. Spaeth, 232 Minn. 128, 132, (“reenactment of a statute without change, after construction .
Curtis v. Altria Group, Inc. 813 N.W.2d 891 Minn. 2012
Curtis v. Altria Group, Inc. 813 N.W.2d 891 Minn. 2012
Co. v. Spaeth, 232 Minn. 128, 132 , (stating that the “judicial construction of a statute, so long as it is unreversed, is as much a part thereof as if it had been written into it originally”) (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
Veit Co. v. Lake County 707 N.W.2d 725 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Veit Co. v. Lake County 707 N.W.2d 725 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Co. v. Spaeth, 232 Minn. 128, 131-32 , -42 (Minn.1950) (“The judicial construction of a statute, so long as it is unreversed, is as much a part thereof as if it had been written into it originally”); see also Minn.Stat.
State Farm v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. 678 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State Farm v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. 678 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Co. v. Spaeth, 232 Minn. 128, 132 , (stating “reenactment of a statute without change, after construction of the statute by [the supreme court], presumptively constitutes an adoption of such construction”).
State v. Anderson 666 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 2003
State v. Anderson 666 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 2003
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Spaeth, 232 Minn. 128, 131-32 , -42 (Minn.1950) (“The ‘judicial construction of a statute, so long as it is unreversed, is as much a part thereof as if it had been written into it originally’ ” and quoting 6 Dunnell, Dig.
Hare v. State, Department of Human Services 666 N.W.2d 427 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Hare v. State, Department of Human Services 666 N.W.2d 427 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Co. v. Spaeth, 232 Minn. 128, 132 , (stating that “reenactment of a statute without change, after construction * * ⅜.
State v. Coauette 601 N.W.2d 443 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Newman 538 N.W.2d 476 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Newman 538 N.W.2d 476 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Co. v. Spaeth, 232 Minn. 128, 132 , (“reenactment of a statute without change, after construction * * * by the court, presumptively constitutes an adoption of such construction”).
Rocco Altobelli, Inc. v. State, Department of Commerce 524 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Rocco Altobelli, Inc. v. State, Department of Commerce 524 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Co., cf. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Spaeth, 232 Minn. 128, 132 , (“This court has frequently held that the reenactment of a statute without change, after construction of the statute by the court, presumptively constitutes an adoption of such construction.”).
SHANNON SALES CO., INC. v. Williams 490 N.W.2d 436 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
SHANNON SALES CO., INC. v. Williams 490 N.W.2d 436 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Co. v. Spaeth, 232 Minn. 128, 132
Thompson Plumbing Co. v. McGlynn Companies 486 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Thompson Plumbing Co. v. McGlynn Companies 486 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Co. v. Spaeth, 232 Minn. 128, 132
Thorp v. Price Bros. Co. 441 N.W.2d 817 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Soo Line Railroad v. Commissioner of Revenue 377 N.W.2d 453 Minn. 1985
Soo Line Railroad v. Commissioner of Revenue 377 N.W.2d 453 Minn. 1985
468 (1941); Pullman Co. v. Commissioner of Taxation, 223 Minn. 96 , and Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Spaeth, 232 Minn. 128 , for the proposition that a franchise tax is necessarily a tax on the property of the franchise.
Larson Ex Rel. Larson v. Independent School District No. 314, Braham 289 N.W.2d 112 Minn. 1979
Larson Ex Rel. Larson v. Independent School District No. 314, Braham 289 N.W.2d 112 Minn. 1979
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Spaeth, 232 Minn. 128, 132 , Fitzpatrick v. City of St.
Stawikowski v. Collins Electric Construction Co. 289 N.W.2d 390 Minn. 1979
Stawikowski v. Collins Electric Construction Co. 289 N.W.2d 390 Minn. 1979
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Spaeth, 232 Minn. 128 , Cashman v. Hedberg, 215 Minn. 463 , 1A Sands, Sutherland Statutory Construction (4 ed.) § 22.33.
Robinson v. Lamott 289 N.W.2d 60 Minn. 1979
Robinson v. Lamott 289 N.W.2d 60 Minn. 1979
2 See, Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Spaeth, 232 Minn. 128
Washington Cty. v. AM. FED. OF STATE, ETC. 262 N.W.2d 163 Minn. 1978
County of Washington v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council No. 91 262 N.W.2d 163 Minn. 1978
Washington Cty. v. AM. FED. OF STATE, ETC. 262 N.W.2d 163 Minn. 1978
Co. v. Spaeth, 232 Minn. 128
County of Washington v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council No. 91 262 N.W.2d 163 Minn. 1978
Co. v. Spaeth, 232 Minn. 128
State Ex Rel. Spannaus v. Coin Wholesalers, Inc. 250 N.W.2d 583 Minn. 1976
State Ex Rel. Spannaus v. Coin Wholesalers, Inc. 250 N.W.2d 583 Minn. 1976
Co. v. Spaeth, 232 Minn. 128 , but not as an immutable proposition.
Beckman v. St. Louis County Board of Commissioners 241 N.W.2d 302 Minn. 1976
Beckman v. St. Louis County Board of Commissioners 241 N.W.2d 302 Minn. 1976
Co. v. Spaeth, 232 Minn. 128
Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees, Lodge 364 v. State, Department of … 229 N.W.2d 3 Minn. 1975
BROTH. OF RY. CLERKS v. State by Balfour 229 N.W.2d 3 Minn. 1975
Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees, Lodge 364 v. State, Department of … 229 N.W.2d 3 Minn. 1975
Co. v. Spaeth, 232 Minn. 128
BROTH. OF RY. CLERKS v. State by Balfour 229 N.W.2d 3 Minn. 1975
Co. v. Spaeth, 232 Minn. 128