DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Barnes v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 47 N.W.2d 180.

73 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
  • State of Minnesota v. Alexander Kenton Edmondson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
  • State of Minnesota v. Alexander Kenton Edmondson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
    The law requires only that “the charge as a whole convey to the jury a clear and correct understanding of the law of the case.” Johnson, d at 339 (quoting Barnes v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 233 Minn. 410, 421, ).
  • DOMAGALA v. Rolland 787 N.W.2d 662 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
  • DOMAGALA v. Rolland 787 N.W.2d 662 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
    Airlines, Inc., 233 Minn. 410, 420
  • Stewart v. Koenig 767 N.W.2d 497 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
  • Stewart v. Koenig 767 N.W.2d 497 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
    Airlines, Inc., 233 Minn. 410, 421
  • State v. Johnson 699 N.W.2d 335 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
  • State v. Johnson 699 N.W.2d 335 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
    The law requires only that “the charge as a whole convey to the jury a clear and correct understanding of the law of the case.” Barnes v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 233 Minn. 410, 421
  • In Re the Child of Simon 662 N.W.2d 155 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • In Re the Child of Simon 662 N.W.2d 155 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
    See Barnes v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 233 Minn. 410, 433 , (concluding that report of plane-crash investigation containing expression of opinion inadmissible under public-records exception to hearsay rule “not on the ground that it was not *162 properly certified or exemplified, but upon the more serious ground that * * * [defendant had no opp
  • McGrath v. TCF Bank Savings, FSB 502 N.W.2d 801 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • McGrath v. TCF Bank Savings, FSB 502 N.W.2d 801 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
    (quoting Barnes v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 233 Minn. 410, 421 , ).
  • Dallum v. Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc. 462 N.W.2d 608 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
  • Dallum v. Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc. 462 N.W.2d 608 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
    All a trial court is required to do is give a charge which “as a whole con *613 vey[s] to the jury a clear and correct understanding of the law of the case.” Barnes v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 233 Minn. 410, 421
  • State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Short 448 N.W.2d 560 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
  • State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Short 448 N.W.2d 560 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
    (quoting Barnes v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 233 Minn. 410, 421 , ).
  • Jewett v. Deutsch 437 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
  • Jewett v. Deutsch 437 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
    * * * Considerable latitude must be allowed the trial Court in the language used so long as the substance of the law is correctly stated.’ Barnes v. Northwest Airlines, 233 Minn. 410, 421
  • Senf v. Bolluyt 419 N.W.2d 645 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • Senf v. Bolluyt 419 N.W.2d 645 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
    In any case, “Considerable latitude must be allowed the trial court in the language used so long as the substance of the law is correctly stated.” Barnes v. Northwest Airlines, 233 Minn. 410, 421
  • Bianchi v. Nordby 409 N.W.2d 835 Minn. 1987
  • Bianchi v. Nordby 409 N.W.2d 835 Minn. 1987
    * * * Considerable latitude must be allowed the trial court in the language used so long as the substance of the law is correctly stated.” Barnes v. Northwest Airlines, 233 Minn. 410, 421
  • Alholm v. Wilt 394 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1986
  • Alholm v. Wilt 394 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1986
    Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200, 208 , Barnes v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 233 Minn. 410, 421
  • Matter of Welfare of LZ 380 N.W.2d 898 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • Matter of Welfare of LZ 380 N.W.2d 898 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    Barnes v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 233 Minn. 410, 433
  • Dahlbeck v. DICO Co., Inc. 355 N.W.2d 157 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • Dahlbeck v. DICO Co., Inc. 355 N.W.2d 157 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    See Barnes v. Northwest Airlines Inc., 233 Minn. 410, 433 , (Public records containing expressions of opinion or the exercise of judgment and discretion are not within public records exception to the hearsay rule).
  • Ossenfort Ex Rel. Ossenfort v. Associated Milk Producers, Inc. 254 N.W.2d 672 Minn. 1977
  • Ossenfort Ex Rel. Ossenfort v. Associated Milk Producers, Inc. 254 N.W.2d 672 Minn. 1977
    Barnes v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 233 Minn. 410 , Gill v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 228 Minn. 164
  • Romero v. City of Richfield 253 N.W.2d 152 Minn. 1977
  • Romero v. City of Richfield 253 N.W.2d 152 Minn. 1977
    Paul Ry., 241 Minn. 15 , [1954]), (b) reports such as this are not admissible as public records if they contain opinions (Barnes v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 233 Minn. 410 , [1951]), and (c) such reports are not admissible as representative admissions if they are in opinion form (Albertson v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St.
  • Williams v. Hoyt Construction Co., Inc. 237 N.W.2d 339 Minn. 1975
  • Williams v. Hoyt Construction Co., Inc. 237 N.W.2d 339 Minn. 1975
    600.13, which provides in relevant part: “The original record made by any public officer in the performance of his official duty shall be prima facie evidence of the facts required or permitted by law to be by him recorded.” Both parties refer to Barnes v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 233 Minn. 410 , where we held that the trial court had properly excluded from the evidence in a tort case involving an air crash a report of an army investigative board.
  • Kostohryz v. McGuire 212 N.W.2d 850 Minn. 1973
  • Kostohryz v. McGuire 212 N.W.2d 850 Minn. 1973
    Considering the uncertainty at trial concerning the theories of liability and defense with respect to each of plaintiffs’ claims, the court’s instructions nevertheless comply with the standard as stated in Barnes v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 233 Minn. 410, 421 , as follows: “All that is required in the way of instructions is that the charge as a whole convey to the jury a clear and correct understanding of the law of the case.
  • County of Hennepin v. Shasky 182 N.W.2d 431 Minn. 1970
  • County of Hennepin v. Shasky 182 N.W.2d 431 Minn. 1970
    Barnes v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 233 Minn. 410 , 47 N. W. (2d) 180 .
  • Hovey Ex Rel. Corporon v. Wagoner 177 N.W.2d 796 Minn. 1970
  • Hovey Ex Rel. Corporon v. Wagoner 177 N.W.2d 796 Minn. 1970
    We pointed out in Barnes v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 233 Minn. 410, 420 , 47 N. W. (2d) 180 , 187: “* * * A court, through its instruction, is not authorized to give prominence to and emphasize particular facts disclosed by the evidence, thus singling out elements or views upon the controversy which were proper for argument and discussion by counsel * * Even though a party may be ent
  • Bossons v. the Hertz Corporation 176 N.W.2d 882 Minn. 1970
  • Bossons v. the Hertz Corporation 176 N.W.2d 882 Minn. 1970
    Heffter v. Northern States Power Co. 173 Minn. 215 , ; Johnson v. Coca Cola Bottling Co. supra; Barnes v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 233 Minn. 410 , 47 N. W. (2d) 180 ; Rule 43.06, Rules of Civil Procedure.
  • Boraas v. Carlson 127 N.W.2d 439 Minn. 1964
  • Boraas v. Carlson 127 N.W.2d 439 Minn. 1964
    Nubbe v. Hardy *485 Continental Hotel System, 225 Minn. 496 , 31 N. W. (2d) 332 ; Barnes v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 233 Minn. 410 , 47 N. W. (2d) 180 .
  • Sauke v. Bird 125 N.W.2d 421 Minn. 1963
  • Sauke v. Bird 125 N.W.2d 421 Minn. 1963
    2 Manion v. Tweedy, 257 Minn. 59, 64 , 100 N. W. (2d) 124, 128 ; State v. Wilson, 238 Minn. 447, 452 , 57 N. W. (2d) 412, 415 ; Carter v. Duluth Yellow Cab Co. 170 Minn. 250, 253 , ; Barnes v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 233 Minn. 410, 420 , 47 N. W. (2d) 180, 187 ; Minnesota Jury Instruction Guides, Instruction 29.
  • Sabes v. City of Minneapolis 120 N.W.2d 871 Minn. 1963
  • Sabes v. City of Minneapolis 120 N.W.2d 871 Minn. 1963
    f the other circuits which have passed on the question have held that the facts stated in the document must have been within the personal knowledge and observation of the recording official or his subordinates, and that reports based upon general investigations and upon information gleaned second hand from random sources must be excluded.” 12 Appellant relies on Barnes v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 233 Minn. 410, 433 , 47 N. W. (2d) 180, 193 , for the exclusion of the reports written by members of
  • Newcomb v. Meiss 116 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 1962