Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Dahlin v. Kron, 45 N.W.2d 833.
- Swanson v. Brewster 784 N.W.2d 264 Minn. 2010
-
Swanson v. Brewster
784 N.W.2d 264
Minn. 2010
15 Similarly, the Minnesota cases cited by the dissent, Dahlin v. Kron, 232 Minn. 312, 320 , and Dyson v. Schmidt, 260 Minn. 129, 140 , are not dispositive because they were decided when Minnesota followed the common-law collateral-source rule in its entirety, i.e., before 1986 when the Legislature passed the collateral-source statute.
- Tezak v. Bachke 698 N.W.2d 37 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
-
Tezak v. Bachke
698 N.W.2d 37
Minn. Ct. App. 2005
(citing Dahlin v. Kron, 232 Minn. 312 , for the proposition that a plaintiff could recover the reasonable value of medical services provided by a hospital even though those services were rendered gratuitously by the hospital).
- Weber v. Au 512 N.W.2d 348 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
-
Weber v. Au
512 N.W.2d 348
Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Cf. Dahlin v. Kron, 232 Minn. 312, 316 , (civil liability act claim may not be maintained where there was no intoxication despite illegal sale).
- Nadeau v. Austin Mutual Insurance Co. 350 N.W.2d 368 Minn. 1984
-
Nadeau v. Austin Mutual Insurance Co.
350 N.W.2d 368
Minn. 1984
Plaintiffs cite Dahlin v. Kron, 232 Minn. 312 , and Van House v. Canadian Northern Railway, 155 Minn. 65 , 192 N.W.
- Hueper v. Goodrich 314 N.W.2d 828 Minn. 1982
-
Hueper v. Goodrich
314 N.W.2d 828
Minn. 1982
In Dahlin v. Kron, 232 Minn. 312 , this court held that the plaintiff could recover the reasonable value of medical services provided by a hospital even though those services were rendered gratuitously by the hospital.
- Van Tassel v. Horace Mann Insurance Company 207 N.W.2d 348 Minn. 1973
-
Van Tassel v. Horace Mann Insurance Company
207 N.W.2d 348
Minn. 1973
City of Duluth v. District Court, 134 Minn. 28 , Wentworth v. Butler, 134 Minn. 382 , Solberg v. Minneapolis Willys-Knight Co. 177 Minn. 10 , Dahlin v. Kron, 232 Minn. 312 , Dyson v. Schmidt, 260 Minn. 129
- Ross v. Ross 200 N.W.2d 149 Minn. 1972
-
Ross v. Ross
200 N.W.2d 149
Minn. 1972
The only Minnesota case which has dealt with an action under the Civil Damage Act against a defendant not in the liquor business was Dahlin v. Kron, 232 Minn. 312
- Local 1140, International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance 165 N.W.2d 234 Minn. 1969
-
Local 1140, International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance
165 N.W.2d 234
Minn. 1969
See Dahlin v. Kron, 232 Minn. 312 , ; Wells v. Minneapolis B. & A. Assn., 122 Minn. 327 , ; Collins v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 271 Minn. 239 , ; and Beschnett v. Farmers Equitable Ins.
- Beschnett v. Farmers Equitable Insurance Co. 146 N.W.2d 861 Minn. 1966
-
Beschnett v. Farmers Equitable Insurance Co.
146 N.W.2d 861
Minn. 1966
Co. 133 Minn. 293, 294 , ; Dahlin v. Kron, 232 Minn. 312, 320 , 45 N. W. (2d) 833, 837 ; Wilson v. Home Gas Co. Inc. 267 Minn. 162, 167 , 125 N. W. *333 (2d) 725, 729; Collins v. Farmers Ins.
- Collins v. Farmers Insurance Exchange 135 N.W.2d 503 Minn. 1965
-
Collins v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
135 N.W.2d 503
Minn. 1965
7 See, Dyson v. Schmidt, 260 Minn. 129 , 109 N. W. (2d) 262 ; Dahlin v. Kron, 232 Minn. 312 , 45 N. W. (2d) 833 .
- Dyson v. Schmidt 109 N.W.2d 262 Minn. 1961
-
Dyson v. Schmidt
109 N.W.2d 262
Minn. 1961
In Dahlin v. Kron, 232 Minn. 312 , 45 N. W. (2d) 833 , we held that the defendant could not take advantage of the fact that the doctor’s bill and expenses were paid for the plaintiff by a beneficial society, by members of his family, by his employer, or by other persons.
- Ahlstrom v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad 68 N.W.2d 873 Minn. 1955
-
Ahlstrom v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad
68 N.W.2d 873
Minn. 1955
606; see, Graf v. Montgomery Ward & Co. Inc. 234 Minn. 485 , 49 N. W. (2d) 797 ; Dahlin v. Kron, 232 Minn. 312 , 45 N. W. (2d) 833 ; 5 Dunnell, Dig.
- Graf v. Montgomery Ward & Co. 49 N.W.2d 797 Minn. 1951
-
Graf v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
49 N.W.2d 797
Minn. 1951
606; see, also, Dahlin v. Kron, 232 Minn. 312 , 45 N. W. (2d) 833 .