Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hanson v. Homeland Insurance Co. of America, 45 N.W.2d 637.

88 citing documents.

Stotzheim v. Djos 98 N.W.2d 129 Minn. 1959
Stotzheim v. Djos 98 N.W.2d 129 Minn. 1959
Co. 232 Minn. 403 , 45 N. W. (2d) 637 ; Kolatz v. Kelly, 244 Minn. 163 , 69 N. W. (2d) 649 ; Caron v. Farmers Ins.
Danielson v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance 98 N.W.2d 72 Minn. 1959
Danielson v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance 98 N.W.2d 72 Minn. 1959
Co. 232 Minn. 403 , 45 N. W. (2d) 637 .
Hall v. City of Anoka 97 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 1959
Hall v. City of Anoka 97 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 1959
Co. 232 Minn. 403 , 45 N. W. (2d) 637 ; Kolatz v. Kelly, 244 Minn. 163 , 69 N. W. (2d) 649 .
Francis v. Anderson 95 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 1959
Francis v. Anderson 95 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 1959
Co. 232 Minn. 403, 404 , 45 N. W. (2d) 637, 638 , we said: “It is elementary that a motion for a directed verdict, which by its very nature accepts the view of the entire evidence most favorable to the adverse party and admits the credibility (except in extreme cases) of the evidence in his favor and all reasonable inferences to be dra
Lee v. Smith 92 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 1958
Lee v. Smith 92 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 1958
Co. 232 Minn. 403 , 45 N. W. (2d) 637 , the test does not require a consideration of only that part of the evidence which is favorable to a contrary verdict but rather a consideration of the evidence as a whole.
Haugen v. Dick Thayer Motor Co. 91 N.W.2d 585 Minn. 1958
Haugen v. Dick Thayer Motor Co. 91 N.W.2d 585 Minn. 1958
Co. 232 Minn. 403 , 45 N. W. (2d) 637 ; Moberg v. Commercial Credit Corp. 230 Minn. 469 , 42 N. W. (2d) 54 .
Erickson v. Strickler 90 N.W.2d 232 Minn. 1958
Erickson v. Strickler 90 N.W.2d 232 Minn. 1958
Co. 232 Minn. 403 , 45 N. W. (2d) 637 ; Kolatz v. Kelly, 244 Minn. 163 , 69 N. W. (2d) 649 .
Peterson v. Truelson 83 N.W.2d 236 Minn. 1957
Peterson v. Truelson 83 N.W.2d 236 Minn. 1957
Co. 232 Minn. 403, 405 , 45 N. W. (2d) 637, 638 , “Not every conflict in evidence gives birth to a jury question.” The evidence in this case does not permit an inference that the motorman stopped his car for the purpose of permitting the pedestrian to board the car.
Markmann v. H. A. Bruntjen Co. 81 N.W.2d 858 Minn. 1957
Markmann v. H. A. Bruntjen Co. 81 N.W.2d 858 Minn. 1957
Co. 232 Minn. 403 , 45 N. W. (2d) 637 ; Lee v. Lee, 248 Minn. 496 , 80 N. W. (2d) 529 .
Lee v. Lee 80 N.W.2d 529 Minn. 1957
Lee v. Lee 80 N.W.2d 529 Minn. 1957
Co. 232 Minn. 403 , 45 N. W. (2d) 637 ; 19 Dunnell, Dig.
Lovejoy v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Implement Co. 79 N.W.2d 688 Minn. 1956
Lovejoy v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Implement Co. 79 N.W.2d 688 Minn. 1956
Co. 232 Minn. 403, 404 , 45 N. W. (2d) 637, 638 ; see, also, Van Tassel v. Patterson, 235 Minn. 152 , 50 N. W. (2d) 113 .
Schroht v. Voll 71 N.W.2d 843 Minn. 1955
Schroht v. Voll 71 N.W.2d 843 Minn. 1955
Co. 232 Minn. 403 , 45 N. W. (2d) 637 .
Forde v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 63 N.W.2d 11 Minn. 1954
Forde v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 63 N.W.2d 11 Minn. 1954
Co. 232 Minn. 403 , 45 N. W. (2d) 637 ; Rule 52.01 of Rules of Civil Procedure; 2 Youngquist & Blacik, Minnesota Rules Practice, p. 648.
Village of Plummer v. Anchor Casualty Co. 61 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 1953
Village of Plummer v. Anchor Casualty Co. 61 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 1953
Co. 232 Minn. 403 , 45 N. W. (2d) 637 .
Beery v. Northern States Power Co. 57 N.W.2d 838 Minn. 1953
Beery v. Northern States Power Co. 57 N.W.2d 838 Minn. 1953
Co. 232 Minn. 403 , 45 N. W. (2d) 637 .
Kath v. Kath 55 N.W.2d 691 Minn. 1952
Kath v. Kath 55 N.W.2d 691 Minn. 1952
Co. 232 Minn. 403 , 45 N. W. (2d) 637 .
Crea v. Wuellner 51 N.W.2d 283 Minn. 1952
Crea v. Wuellner 51 N.W.2d 283 Minn. 1952
Co. 232 Minn. 403 , 45 N. W. (2d) 637 .
Van Tassel v. Patterson 50 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 1951
Van Tassel v. Patterson 50 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 1951
Co. 232 Minn. 403, 405 , 45 N. W. (2d) 637, 638 , that “if the evidence as a whole so overwhelmingly preponderates in favor of a party as to leave no doubt as to the factual truth, he is entitled to a directed verdict as a matter of law, even though there is some evidence which, if standing alone, would justify a verdict to the contrar
Hanrahan v. Safway Steel Scaffold Co. 46 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 1951
Hanrahan v. Safway Steel Scaffold Co. 46 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 1951
Co. 232 Minn. 403, 404 , 45 N. W. (2d) 637, 638 , in connection with an appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial in an action wherein a verdict was directed for plaintiffs, it was said: “It is elementary that a motion for a directed verdict, which by its very nature accepts the view of the entire evidence most fa

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by