DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Shaw v. Utecht, 43 N.W.2d 781.

40 citing documents.

  • State v. Stewart 486 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
  • State v. Stewart 486 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
    1927 Minn.Laws ch. 236, repealed by 1963 Minn.Laws ch. 753, art. 2 § 17; see also Shaw v. Utecht, 232 Minn. 82, 88-89 , cert.
  • State Ex Rel. Nelson v. Tahash 121 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 1963
  • State Ex Rel. Nelson v. Tahash 121 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 1963
    2 Shaw v. Utecht, 232 Minn. 82 , 43 N. W. (2d) 781 , certiorari denied, 340 U. S. 855 , 71 S. Ct. 73 , 95 L. ed. 627.
  • State Ex Rel. Shannon v. Tahash 121 N.W.2d 59 Minn. 1963
  • State Ex Rel. Shannon v. Tahash 121 N.W.2d 59 Minn. 1963
    Pontius v. Rigg, 251 Minn. 164 , 86 N. W. (2d) 726 ; and Shaw v. Utecht, 232 Minn. 82 , 43 N. W. (2d) 781 , certiorari denied, 340 U. S. 855 , 71 S. Ct. 73 , 95 L. ed. 627.
  • State ex rel. Hoffman v. Tahash 116 N.W.2d 662 Minn. 1962
  • State ex rel. Hoffman v. Tahash 116 N.W.2d 662 Minn. 1962
    “See Shaw v. Utecht, 232 Minn. 82 ; d, 781 .” The trial court was correct in denying the petition.
  • State ex rel. Farrington v. Tahash 115 N.W.2d 921 Minn. 1962
  • State ex rel. Farrington v. Tahash 115 N.W.2d 921 Minn. 1962
    However, it is fundamental that “reception of inadmissible evidence does not render a judgment subject to collateral attack in a habeas corpus proceeding.” Shaw v. Utecht, 232 Minn. 82, 86 , 43 N. W. (2d) 781, 784 , certiorari denied, 340 U. S. 855 , 71 S. Ct. 73 , 95 L. ed. 627.
  • State Ex Rel. Campbell v. Tahash 112 N.W.2d 37 Minn. 1961
  • State Ex Rel. Campbell v. Tahash 112 N.W.2d 37 Minn. 1961
    The judge who considered and denied the first petition explained in a memorandum that if the sentence lacked clearness by reason of omission of the words “according to law” such an omission was merely an error in form and did not render the sentence void or subject it to collateral attack by habeas corpus, citing Shaw v. Utecht, 232 Minn. 82 , 43 N. W. (2d) 781 , certiorari denied, 340 U. S. 855 , 71 S. Ct. 73 , 95 L. ed. 627.
  • State v. Wiley 108 N.W.2d 774 Minn. 1961
  • State v. Wiley 108 N.W.2d 774 Minn. 1961
    Shaw v. Utecht, 232 Minn. 82 , 43 N. W. (2d) 781 .
  • State Ex Rel. Flynn v. Rigg 98 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 1959
  • State Ex Rel. Flynn v. Rigg 98 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 1959
    8 Shaw v. Utecht, 232 Minn. 82 , 43 N. W. (2d) 781 , certiorari denied, 340 U. S. 855 , 71 S. Ct. 73 , 95 L. ed. 627; State ex rel.
  • State Ex Rel. Soward v. Rigg 97 N.W.2d 468 Minn. 1959
  • State Ex Rel. Soward v. Rigg 97 N.W.2d 468 Minn. 1959
    985 ): “* * =:■ arL indeterminate sentence, imposed under a law authorizing *143 such sentences, is a sentence for the maximum term prescribed for the offense committed, coupled with a provision which permits but does not require an earlier release; that, as an earlier release cannot be demanded as of right, the sentence necessarily operates as a sentence for the maximum term.” In Shaw v. Utecht, 232 Minn. 82, 89 , 43 N. W. (2d) 781, 786 , certiorari denied, 340 U. S. 855 , 71 S. Ct. 73 , 95 L.
  • State Ex Rel. Shelby v. Rigg 96 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1959
  • State Ex Rel. Shelby v. Rigg 96 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1959
    Baker v. Utecht, 221 Minn. 145 , 21 N. W. (2d) 328 ; Shaw v. Utecht, 232 Minn. 82 , 43 N. W. (2d) 781 , certiorari denied, 340 U. S. 855 , 71 S. Ct. 73 , 95 L. ed. 627; State v. Rudin, 153 Minn. 159 , ; 25 Am.
  • State Ex Rel. Thomas v. Rigg 96 N.W.2d 252 Minn. 1959
  • State Ex Rel. Thomas v. Rigg 96 N.W.2d 252 Minn. 1959
    Baker v. Utecht, 221 Minn. 145 , 21 N. W. (2d) 328 , certiorari denied, 327 U. S. 810 , 66 S. Ct. 971 , 90 L. ed. 1034; Shaw v. Utecht, 232 Minn. 82 , 43 N. W. (2d) 781 , certiorari denied, 340 U. S. 855 , 71 S. Ct. 73 , 95 L. ed. 627; State v. Rudin, 153 Minn. 159 , ; 25 Am.
  • State Ex Rel. Adams v. Jackson 94 N.W.2d 285 Minn. 1959
  • State Ex Rel. Adams v. Jackson 94 N.W.2d 285 Minn. 1959
    Also, see Shaw v. Utecht, 232 Minn. 82 , 43 N. W. (2d) 781 , certiorari denied, 340 U. S. 855 , 71 S. Ct. 73 , 95 L. ed. 627, which is authority for the proposition that error is not reviewed in habeas corpus, and Dixon v. Swenson, 241 Minn. 332 , 62 N. W. (2d) 926 , which deals with the sufficiency of relator’s petition in a habeas corpus proceeding and w
  • State Ex Rel. Welper v. Rigg 93 N.W.2d 198 Minn. 1958
  • State Ex Rel. Welper v. Rigg 93 N.W.2d 198 Minn. 1958
    Naus v. Rigg, 250 Minn. 365 , 84 N. W. (2d) 698 , certiorari denied, 355 U. S. 884 , 78 S. a. 153, 2 L. ed. (2d) 114; Shaw v. Utecht, 232 Minn. 82 , 43 N. W. (2d) 781 , certiorari denied, 340 U. S. 855 , 71 S. Ct. 73 , 95 L. ed. 627.
  • State Ex Rel. Adams v. Rigg 89 N.W.2d 898 Minn. 1958
  • State Ex Rel. Adams v. Rigg 89 N.W.2d 898 Minn. 1958
    Petcoff v. Reed, 138 Minn. 465 , ; Shaw v. Utecht, 232 Minn. 82 , 43 N. W. (2d) 781 .
  • State Ex Rel. Savage v. Rigg 84 N.W.2d 640 Minn. 1957
  • State Ex Rel. Savage v. Rigg 84 N.W.2d 640 Minn. 1957
    As to the proper function of a writ of habeas corpus, see Shaw v. Utecht, 232 Minn. 82 , 43 N. W. (2d) 781 , certiorari denied, 340 U. S. 855 , 71 S. Ct. 73 , 95 L. ed. 627; Breeding v. Utecht, 239 Minn. 137 , 59 N. W. (2d) 314 .
  • State Ex Rel. Butler v. Swenson 66 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1954
  • State Ex Rel. Butler v. Swenson 66 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1954
    11 Shaw v. Utecht, 232 Minn. 82 , 43 N. W. (2d) 781 , certiorari denied, 340 U. S. 855 , 71 S. Ct. 73 , 95 L. ed. 627; Helms v. Humphrey (D. Minn.) 63 F. Supp. 4 .
  • State Ex Rel. May v. Swenson 65 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 1954
  • State Ex Rel. May v. Swenson 65 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 1954
    Shaw v. Utecht, 232 Minn. 82, 85 , 43 N. W. (2d) 781, 784 , certiorari denied, 340 U. S. 855 , 71 S. Ct. 73 , 95 L. ed. 627.
  • State Ex Rel. Richter v. Swenson 63 N.W.2d 265 Minn. 1954
  • State Ex Rel. Richter v. Swenson 63 N.W.2d 265 Minn. 1954
    Petcoff v. Reed, 138 Minn. 465 , ; Shaw v. Utecht, 232 Minn. 82 , 43 N. W. (2d) 781 .
  • State Ex Rel. Koalska v. Swenson 62 N.W.2d 842 Minn. 1954
  • State Ex Rel. Koalska v. Swenson 62 N.W.2d 842 Minn. 1954
    See Shaw v. Utecht, 232 Minn. 82 , , cert, den’d 340 U. S. 855 , 71 S. Ct. 73 , 95 L. ed. 627; State ex rel.
  • Shaw v. Utecht 49 N.W.2d 385 Minn. 1951
  • Shaw v. Utecht 49 N.W.2d 385 Minn. 1951
    We considered all the questions raised by the present petition in our opinion in Shaw v. Utecht, 232 Minn. 82 , 43 N. W. (2d) 781 , certiorari denied, 340 U. S. 855 , 71 S. Ct. 73 , 95 L. ed. 627.