DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Aske v. Aske, 47 N.W.2d 417.

39 citing documents.

  • Rodgers v. Knauff 649 N.W.2d 166 Minn. 2002
  • In Re Custody of NAK 649 N.W.2d 166 Minn. 2002
  • In Re Custody of NAK 649 N.W.2d 166 Minn. 2002
    See Wallin, 290 Minn. at 266 , d at 630 (citing Fish v. Fish, 280 Minn. 316 , and Aske v. Aske, 233 Minn. 540 , ).
  • Wallin v. Wallin 187 N.W.2d 627 Minn. 1971
  • Wallin v. Wallin 187 N.W.2d 627 Minn. 1971
    tablished on the mother’s part neglect, abandonment, incapacity, moral delinquency, instability of character, or inability to furnish the child with needed care, Eisel v. Eisel, supra; Meinhardt v. Meinhardt, supra; Currier v. Currier, supra; or unless it has been established that such custody otherwise would not be in the best welfare and interest of the child, Fish v. Fish, supra; Aske v. Aske, 233 Minn. 540 , 47 N. W. (2d) 417 .
  • High v. High 179 N.W.2d 274 Minn. 1970
  • High v. High 179 N.W.2d 274 Minn. 1970
    Waslie v. Waslie, 274 Minn. 564 , 143 N. W. (2d) 634 ; Currier v. Currier, 271 Minn. 369 , 136 N. W. (2d) 55 ; Aske v. Aske, 233 Minn. 540 , 47 N. W. (2d) 417 ; Annotation, 99 A. L. R. (2d) 954.
  • Hansen v. Hansen 169 N.W.2d 12 Minn. 1969
  • Hansen v. Hansen 169 N.W.2d 12 Minn. 1969
    In Aske v. Aske, 233 Minn. 540 , 47 N. W. (2d) 417 , the only case cited and relied upon by plaintiff herein, in addition to a finding of multiple sexual relationships by the wife, special *7 emphasis was given to the fact that the mother, in seeking a review-of the custody decree, did so 6 1/2 years after the original award was made to the father
  • In Re O'Neil 453 P.2d 533 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
  • Lindberg v. Lindberg 163 N.W.2d 870 Minn. 1969
  • Lindberg v. Lindberg 163 N.W.2d 870 Minn. 1969
    4 E. g., Aske v. Aske, 233 Minn. 540 , 47 N. W. (2d) 417 ; State ex rel.
  • Fish v. Fish 159 N.W.2d 271 Minn. 1968
  • Fish v. Fish 159 N.W.2d 271 Minn. 1968
    Aske v. Aske, 233 Minn. 540, 541 , 47 N. W. (2d) 417, 418 ; Christianson v. Christianson, 217 Minn. 561 , 15 N. W. (2d) 24 .
  • Bennett v. Bennett 152 N.W.2d 187 Minn. 1967
  • Bennett v. Bennett 152 N.W.2d 187 Minn. 1967
    We think this case is controlled by Aske v. Aske, 233 Minn. 540 , 47 N. W. (2d) 417 , and Dacey v. Dacey, 179 Minn. 520 , , as well as other decisions which have considered the same problem.
  • Currier v. Currier 136 N.W.2d 55 Minn. 1965
  • Currier v. Currier 136 N.W.2d 55 Minn. 1965
    See, Arne v. Holland, 85 Minn. 401 , ; Aske v. Aske, 233 Minn. 540, 543 , 47 N. W. (2d) 417, 419 ; Jones v. Jones, 242 Minn. 251, 264 , 64 N. W. (2d) 508, 516 .
  • Bryant v. Bryant 119 N.W.2d 714 Minn. 1963
  • Village of Edina v. Joseph 119 N.W.2d 809 Minn. 1962
  • Village of Edina v. Joseph 119 N.W.2d 809 Minn. 1962
    been held that “[t]he language of this statute plainly gives this court no discretion in the allowance, disallowance, or apportionment of disbursements necessarily paid or incurred.” Molto v. Molto, 242 Minn. 112, 118 , 64 N. W. (2d) 154, 158 , citing Collins v. Collins, 221 Minn. 343 , 22 N. W. (2d) 168 , 23 N. W. (2d) 9 ; Krusemark v. Krusemark, 232 Minn. 416 , 46 N. W. (2d) 647 ; Aske v. Aske, 233 Minn. 540 , 47 N. W. (2d) 417 .
  • Ward v. Ward 114 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1962
  • Ward v. Ward 114 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1962
    1 See, also, Johnson v. Johnson, 256 Minn. 33 , 97 N. W. (2d) 279 ; Eck v. Eck, 252 Minn. 290 , 90 N. W. (2d) 211 ; Naffke v. Naffke, 240 Minn. 468 , 62 N. W. (2d) 63 ; Aske v. Aske, 233 Minn. 540 , 47 N. W. (2d) 417 ; Krusemark v. Krusemark, 232 Minn. 416 , 46 N. W. (2d) 647 ; Wilson v. Wilson, 229 Minn. 126 , 38 N. W. (2d) 154 ; Thompson v. Thompson, 227 Minn. 256 , 35 N. W. (2d) 289 ; Minn. St.
  • Meinhardt v. Meinhardt 111 N.W.2d 782 Minn. 1961
  • Meinhardt v. Meinhardt 111 N.W.2d 782 Minn. 1961
    3 See, also, Volkman v. Volkman, 151 Minn. 78 , ; Spratt v. Spratt, 151 Minn. 458 , , ; Christianson v. Christianson, 217 Minn. 561 , 15 N. W. (2d) 24 ; Johnson v. Johnson, 223 Minn. 420 , 27 N. W. (2d) 289 ; Wicklem v. Wicklem, 229 Minn. 478 , 40 N. W. (2d) 69 ; Aske v. Aske, 233 Minn. 540 , 47 N. W. (2d) 417 ; MacWhinney v. MacWhinney, 248 Minn. 303 , 79 N. W. (2d) 683 .
  • Eisel v. Eisel 110 N.W.2d 881 Minn. 1961
  • Eisel v. Eisel 110 N.W.2d 881 Minn. 1961
    The plaintiff places particular reliance on three cases which he asserts are controlling in favor of affirmance, Dacey v. Dacey, 179 Minn. 520 , ; Aske v. Aske, 233 Minn. 540 , 47 N. W. (2d) 417 ; and Bastian v. Bastian, 13 Ohio Opinions (2d) 267, 81 Ohio L. Abs.
  • Anderson v. Anderson 109 N.W.2d 571 Minn. 1961
  • Anderson v. Anderson 109 N.W.2d 571 Minn. 1961
    MacWhinney v. MacWhixmey, 248 Minn. 303 , 79 N. W. (2d) 683 ; Polzin v. Polzin, 237 Minn. 164 , 54 N. W. (2d) 143 ; French v. French, 236 Minn. 439 , 53 N. W. (2d) 215 ; Aske v. Aske, 233 Minn. 540 , 47 N. W. (2d) 417 .
  • In Re Booth 253 Minn. 395 Minn. 1958
  • In Re Booth 253 Minn. 395 Minn. 1958
    (2d) 705 ; Aske v. Aske, 233 Minn. 540 , 47 N.W.
  • MacWhinney v. MacWhinney 79 N.W.2d 683 Minn. 1956
  • MacWhinney v. MacWhinney 79 N.W.2d 683 Minn. 1956
    2 Spratt v. Spratt, 151 Minn. 458 , , ; Aske v. Aske, 233 Minn. 540 , 47 N. W. (2d) 417 ; Wicklem v. Wicklem, 229 Minn. 478 , 40 N. W. (2d) 69 ; Johnson v. Johnson, 223 Minn. 420 , 27 N. W. (2d) 289 ; Christianson v. Christianson, 217 Minn. 561 , 15 N. W. (2d) 24 ; Larson v. Larson, 176 Minn. 490 , .
  • Stoll v. Stoll 68 N.W.2d 367 Minn. 1955
  • Stoll v. Stoll 68 N.W.2d 367 Minn. 1955
    Aske v. Aske, 233 Minn. 540 , 47 N. W. (2d) 417 ; Wicklem v. Wicklem, 229 Minn. 478 , 40 N. W. (2d) 69 ; Christianson v. Christianson, 217 Minn. 561 , 15 N. W. (2d) 24 ; Novotny v. Novotny, 152 Minn. 420 , .
  • Molto v. Molto 64 N.W.2d 154 Minn. 1954
  • Molto v. Molto 64 N.W.2d 154 Minn. 1954
    Aske v. Aske, 233 Minn. 540 , 47 N.W.
  • Polzin v. Polzin 54 N.W.2d 143 Minn. 1952
  • Polzin v. Polzin 54 N.W.2d 143 Minn. 1952
    The facts in this case are very similar to those in Aske v. Aske, 233 Minn. 540 , 47 N. W. (2d) 417 .