Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Jackson v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co., 47 N.W.2d 449.

30 citing documents.

In Re the Disability Earnings Offset of Masson 753 N.W.2d 755 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
In Re the Disability Earnings Offset of Masson 753 N.W.2d 755 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Cf Jackson v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co., 234 Minn. 52, 55 , (emphasizing that unemployment-benefit payments are “not made to discharge any liability or obligation of [the employer], but to carry out a policy of social betterment for the benefit of the entire state”); Lolling, d at 376 (citing Jackson for proposition that unemployment be
Lolling v. Midwest Patrol 545 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1996
Lolling v. Midwest Patrol 545 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1996
Reemployment insurance benefits are considered to be state funds, Jackson v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co., 234 Minn. 52, 55 , and courts, in ascertaining the intention of the legislature, presume that “[t]he legislature intends to favor the public interest as against any private interest.” Minn.Stat.
Lilledahl v. Process Displays Co. 413 N.W.2d 273 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Lilledahl v. Process Displays Co. 413 N.W.2d 273 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(overruled by 1979 Minn.Laws ch. 181 § 11); Anson v. Fisher Amusement Corp., 254 Minn. 93 , (overruled by 1983 Minn.Laws ch. 372 § 26); Bergseth v. Zinsmaster Baking Co., 252 Minn. 63 , (overruled by 1977 Minn.Laws ch. 242 § 1); Jackson v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co., 234 Minn. 52 , (overruled by 1975 Minn. Laws ch. 336 § 3).
Jansen v. PEOPLES ELEC. CO., INC. 317 N.W.2d 879 Minn. 1982
Jansen v. PEOPLES ELEC. CO., INC. 317 N.W.2d 879 Minn. 1982
Jackson v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co., 234 Minn. 52 , Johnson v. LaGrange Shoe Corp., 244 Minn. 354
Loftis v. Legionville School Safety Patrol Training Center, Inc. 297 N.W.2d 237 Minn. 1980
Loftis v. Legionville School Safety Patrol Training Center, Inc. 297 N.W.2d 237 Minn. 1980
Co., from vacation shutdowns, Jackson v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co., 234 Minn. 52 , Johnson v. LaGrange Shoe Corp., 244 Minn. 354 , and from the operation of mandatory retirement systems pursuant either to a collective bargaining agreement, Bergseth v. Zinsmaster Baking Co., 252 Minn. 63 , or to a policy imposed unilaterally by the e
Stawikowski v. Collins Electric Construction Co. 289 N.W.2d 390 Minn. 1979
Stawikowski v. Collins Electric Construction Co. 289 N.W.2d 390 Minn. 1979
In Jackson v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co., 234 Minn. 52 , we held that employees not entitled to vacation pay were voluntarily unemployed and not eligible for unemployment compensation during a vacation shutdown of the plant occurring by reason of a clause in the collective bargaining agreement.
Johnson v. Ford Motor Company 184 N.W.2d 786 Minn. 1971
Johnson v. Ford Motor Company 184 N.W.2d 786 Minn. 1971
In support of this assertion, relator cites Jackson v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co. 234 Minn. 52 , 47 N. W. (2d) 449 ; Bergseth v. Zinsmaster Baking Co. 252 Minn. 63 , 89 N. W. (2d) 172 ; 5 and Anson v. *401 Fisher Amusement Corp. 254 Minn. 93 , 93 N. W. (2d) 815 .
Sarja v. Iron Range Resources & Rehabilitation 144 N.W.2d 377 Minn. 1966
Kitchen v. G. R. Herberger's, Inc. 114 N.W.2d 64 Minn. 1962
Kitchen v. G. R. Herberger's, Inc. 114 N.W.2d 64 Minn. 1962
See, also, Jackson v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co. 234 Minn. 52 , 47 N. W. (2d) 449 .
Employment Security Commission v. Magma Copper Co. 366 P.2d 84 Ariz. 1961
Hessler v. American Television & Radio Co. 104 N.W.2d 876 Minn. 1960
Hessler v. American Television & Radio Co. 104 N.W.2d 876 Minn. 1960
In Jackson v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co. 234 Minn. 52, 57 , 47 N. W. (2d) 449, 452 , this court said: “The act was designed to meet only the evils which follow ‘involuntary unemployment,’ with benefits to be paid to ‘persons unemployed through no fault of their own.’ It was not designed to take care of the same evils which might flow from voluntary unemployment.” 6 As to
Anson v. Fisher Amusement Corp. 93 N.W.2d 815 Minn. 1958
Anson v. Fisher Amusement Corp. 93 N.W.2d 815 Minn. 1958
In Jackson v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co. 234 Minn. 52 , 47 N. W. (2d) 449 , where the collective-bargaining contract authorized a company vacation shutdown, claimant, who was not entitled to a vacation, was denied unemployment benefits on the ground that existence of the contract rendered his *100 unemployment voluntary.
Bergseth v. Zinsmaster Baking Co. 89 N.W.2d 172 Minn. 1958
Bergseth v. Zinsmaster Baking Co. 89 N.W.2d 172 Minn. 1958
We have already indicated that we would uphold these agreements in Jackson v Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co. 234 Minn. 52 , 47 N. W. (2d) 449 .
Ayers v. Nichols 70 N.W.2d 296 Minn. 1955
Johnson v. LaGrange Shoe Corporation 70 N.W.2d 335 Minn. 1955
Johnson v. LaGrange Shoe Corporation 70 N.W.2d 335 Minn. 1955
Many of the questions involved here were determined in Jackson v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co. 234 Minn. 52 , 47 N. W. (2d) 449 .
Ayers v. Nichols 70 N.W.2d 296 Minn. 1955
To support this contention, employer relies on our case of Jackson v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co. 234 Minn. 52 , 47 N. W. (2d) 449 .
First National Bank of Mankato v. Wilson 47 N.W.2d 764 Minn. 1951
First National Bank of Mankato v. Wilson 47 N.W.2d 764 Minn. 1951
See, Jackson v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co. 234 Minn. 52 , 47 N. W. (2d) 449 .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by