Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hawkins v. County of Kandiyohi, 48 N.W.2d 441.

28 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Obstruction of Renville County Ditch 59. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
To be sure, at the time a drainage system is established, “every 12 owner of land who has recovered damages or been assessed for benefits has a property right in the maintenance of the ditch in the same condition as it was when originally established.” ().
Charles Carlson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
It is axiomatic that owners of land damaged or benefitted by a drainage system have “a property right in the maintenance of a ditch in the same condition as it was when originally established.”
McLeod County Board of Commissioners v. State, Department of Natural Resources 549 N.W.2d 630 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
McLeod County Board of Commissioners v. State, Department of Natural Resources 549 N.W.2d 630 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Fischer v. Town of Albin, 258 Minn. 154, 156 , (quoting Petition of Jacobson v. Kandiyohi County, 234 Minn. 296, 299 , ).
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Byers 545 N.W.2d 669 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Byers 545 N.W.2d 669 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Fischer v. Town of Albin, 258 Minn. 154, 156 , (citing Petition of Jacobson re County Ditch No. 24, 234 Minn. 296, 299 , ).
Balbach v. Moe 200 N.W.2d 901 Minn. 1972
Balbach v. Moe 200 N.W.2d 901 Minn. 1972
See, In re Petition of Jacobson re County Ditch No. 24, 234 Minn. 296
Olson v. County of Faribault 177 N.W.2d 54 Minn. 1970
Olson v. County of Faribault 177 N.W.2d 54 Minn. 1970
In In re Petition of Jacobson re County Ditch No. 24, 234 Minn. 296 , 48 N. W. (2d) 441 , petitioners wanted to establish Ditch No. 24A to replace Ditch No. 24.
Lenz v. Coon Creek Watershed District 153 N.W.2d 209 Minn. 1967
Lenz v. Coon Creek Watershed District 153 N.W.2d 209 Minn. 1967
They rely solely upon our decision in In re Petition of Jacobson re County Ditch No. 24, 234 Minn. 296 , 48 N. W. (2d) 441 .
Singewald v. Minneapolis Gas Company 142 N.W.2d 739 Minn. 1966
Singewald v. Minneapolis Gas Company 142 N.W.2d 739 Minn. 1966
Decisions of our court dealing with the problem generally include Stone v. Bevans, 88 Minn. 127 , ; City of Minneapolis v. Canterbury, 122 Minn. 301 , , 48 L. R. A. (N. S.) 842; State v. Danculovic, 168 Minn. 359 , ; In re Petition of Jacobson re County Ditch No. 24, 234 Minn. 296 , 48 N. W. (2d) 441 ; Village of Courtland v. Courtland Elec.
Fischer v. Town of Albin 104 N.W.2d 32 Minn. 1960
Fischer v. Town of Albin 104 N.W.2d 32 Minn. 1960
As stated in In re Petition of Jacobson re County Ditch No. 24, 234 Minn. 296, 299 , 48 N. W. (2d) 441 , 444: “Once a ditch system is established, the order creating it constitutes a judgment in rem.
Oelke v. County of Faribault 70 N.W.2d 853 Minn. 1955
Oelke v. County of Faribault 70 N.W.2d 853 Minn. 1955
Lupkes v. Town of Clifton, 157 Minn. 493 , ; In re Petition of Jacobson re County Ditch No. 24, 234 Minn. 296 , 48 N. W. (2d) 441 ; In re Petition for County Ditch No. 53, 238 Minn. 392 , 57 N. W. (2d) 158; In re Petition for County Ditch No. 15, 238 Minn. 15 , 55 N. W. (2d) 305 .
Schultz v. County of Chippewa 57 N.W.2d 158 Minn. 1953
Schultz v. County of Chippewa 57 N.W.2d 158 Minn. 1953
In re Petition of Jacobson re County Ditch No. 24, 234 Minn. 296 , 48 N. W. (2d) 441 ; In re Petition for County Ditch No. 15, 238 Minn. 15 , 55 N. W. (2d) 305 .
In Re Judicial Ditch No. 7, Martin & Faribault Counties 238 Minn. 165 Minn. 1952
Laue v. County of Faribault 56 N.W.2d 435 Minn. 1952
In Re Judicial Ditch No. 7, Martin & Faribault Counties 238 Minn. 165 Minn. 1952
In re Petition of Jacobson re County Ditch No. 24, 234 Minn. 296 , 48 N.W.
Laue v. County of Faribault 56 N.W.2d 435 Minn. 1952
In re Petition of Jacobson re County Ditch No. 24, 234 Minn. 296 , 48 N. W. (2d) 441 .
In Re County Ditch No. 15, Chippewa County 238 Minn. 15 Minn. 1952
Schoenfelder v. Beckman 55 N.W.2d 305 Minn. 1952
In Re County Ditch No. 15, Chippewa County 238 Minn. 15 Minn. 1952
In re Petition of Jacobson for Deepening, etc., of County Ditch No. 24, 234 Minn. 296, 299 , 48 N.W.
Schoenfelder v. Beckman 55 N.W.2d 305 Minn. 1952
Neither can it accomplish that purpose by dumping water from a county ditch system into an entirely separate and distinct established ditch system without first acquiring the right to do so.” In re Petition of Jacobson for Deepening, etc., of County Ditch No. 24, 234 Minn. 296, 299 , 48 N. W. (2d) 441, 444 .