DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bohnen v. Gorr, 47 N.W.2d 459.

29 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
  • State of Minnesota v. Johannes Marliem Minn. Ct. App. 2015
  • State of Minnesota v. Johannes Marliem Minn. Ct. App. 2015
    To support his statutory interpretation, Marliem cites Bohnen v. Gorr, 234 Minn. 71, 76, arguing that the supreme court held that traffic 1 Indeed, Marliem asserts that this is precisely what happened here, claiming that he “completed a full stop about thirty feet before the intersection” and the officer—as she approached the intersection—“did not see .
  • Croxen v. Salhus 376 N.W.2d 739 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Croxen v. Salhus 376 N.W.2d 739 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    *742 Bohnen v. Gorr, 234 Minn. 71, 78
  • Otterness v. Horsley 263 N.W.2d 403 Minn. 1978
  • Otterness v. Horsley 263 N.W.2d 403 Minn. 1978
    Bohnen v. Gorr, 234 Minn. 71 , .
  • Gardner v. Germain 117 N.W.2d 759 Minn. 1962
  • Gardner v. Germain 117 N.W.2d 759 Minn. 1962
    See, also, Bohnen v. Gorr, 234 Minn. 71 , 47 N. W. (2d) 459 , and Haugen v. Dick Thayer Motor Co. 253 Minn. 199 , 91 N. W. (2d) 585 .
  • Anderson v. Mid-Motors, Inc. 98 N.W.2d 188 Minn. 1959
  • Anderson v. Mid-Motors, Inc. 98 N.W.2d 188 Minn. 1959
    Barnabas Hospital, 231 Minn. 384 , 43 N. W. (2d) 221 ; Bohnen v. Gorr, 234 Minn. 71 , 47 N. W. (2d) 459 .
  • Lee v. Smith 92 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 1958
  • Lee v. Smith 92 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 1958
    O’Neill v. Mund, 235 Minn. 112 , 49 N. W. (2d) 812 ; Bohnen v. Gorr, 234 Minn. 71 , 47 N. W. (2d) 459 ; Rampi v. Vevea, 229 Minn. 11 , 38 N. W. (2d) 297 ; Leman v. Standard Oil Co. 246 Minn. 271 , 74 N. W. (2d) 513 ; Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200 , 62 N. W. (2d) 793 ; Peterson v. Lang, 239 Minn. 319 , 58 N. W. (2d) 609 .
  • Satter v. Turner 86 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1957
  • Satter v. Turner 86 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1957
    Olson v. Anderson, 224 Minn. 216 , 28 N. W. (2d) 66 ; Bohnen v. Gorr, 234 Minn. 71 , 47 N. W. (2d) 459 ; Bocchi v. Karnstedt, 238 Minn. 257 , 56 N. W. (2d) 628 ; Schleuder v. Soltow, 239 Minn. 453 , 59 N. W. (2d) 320 .
  • Mottinger v. Halfman 76 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1956
  • Mottinger v. Halfman 76 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1956
    3; and without first ascertaining whether such movement could be made with safety, Bohnen v. Gorr, 234 Minn. 71 , 47 N. W. (2d) 459 ; Schleuder v. Soltow, 239 Minn. 453 , 59 N. W. (2d) 320 ; Waldo v. St.
  • Kolatz v. Kelly 69 N.W.2d 649 Minn. 1955
  • Kolatz v. Kelly 69 N.W.2d 649 Minn. 1955
    Bohnen v. Gorr, 234 Minn. 71 , 47 N. W. (2d) 459 .
  • Thiesen v. Hellermann 64 N.W.2d 762 Minn. 1954
  • Thiesen v. Hellermann 64 N.W.2d 762 Minn. 1954
    While defendant concedes that the driver of a vehicle approaching a through highway is under a duty to stop at a place where he may effectively observe approaching traffic if there is a reasonable opportunity to do so (Bohnen v. Dorr, 234 Minn. 71 , 47 N. W. [2d] 459), he maintains that he had no opportunity whatsoever to view traffic approaching from the west because of the snowbank and that, therefore, his only alternative was to proceed slowly, but nevertheless blindly, into the intersection.
  • Johnson v. Mancilman 63 N.W.2d 569 Minn. 1954
  • Johnson v. Mancilman 63 N.W.2d 569 Minn. 1954
    Defendant also cites Bohnen v. Gorr, 234 Minn. 71 , 47 N. W. (2d) 459 , in support of his contentions, but that case is not in point since the decision there merely upheld a jury finding of negligence and does not hold that there was negligence as a matter of law.
  • Schleuder v. Soltow 59 N.W.2d 320 Minn. 1953
  • Schleuder v. Soltow 59 N.W.2d 320 Minn. 1953
    Bohnen v. Gorr, 234 Minn. 71, 78 , 47 N. W. (2d) 459, 463 ; Olson v. Anderson, 224 Minn. 216, 218 , 28 N. W. (2d) 66, 68 .
  • Rod v. Jeffords 56 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 1953
  • Bocchi v. Karnstedt 56 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 1953
  • Bocchi v. Karnstedt 56 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 1953
    In Bohnen v. Gorr, 234 Minn. 71, 78 , 47 N. W. (2d) 459, 464 , we said: “A stop sign is intended to warn motorists of the presence of a through or arterial highway.
  • Rod v. Jeffords 56 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 1953
    Zickrick v. Strathern, 211 Minn. 329 , 1 N. W. (2d) 134 ; Olson v. Anderson, 224 Minn. 216 , 28 N. W. (2d) 66 ; Bohnen v. Gorr, 234 Minn. 71 , 47 N. W. (2d) 459 .