DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lincoln v. Cambridge-Radisson Co., 49 N.W.2d 1.

36 citing documents.

  • Gilmore v. Walgreen Co. 759 N.W.2d 433 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
  • Gilmore v. Walgreen Co. 759 N.W.2d 433 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
    See, e.g., Lincoln v. Cambridge-Radisson Co., 235 Minn. 20, 23 , (holding that it would not be unreasonable to find condition in hotel lunchroom unsafe because invitee would be distracted); Ober v. The Golden Rule, 146 Minn. 347, 348 , 178 N.W.
  • Taney v. Independent School District No. 624 673 N.W.2d 497 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • Taney v. Independent School District No. 624 673 N.W.2d 497 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
    Lincoln v. Cambridge-Radisson Co., 235 Minn. 20, 23
  • Van Gordon v. Herzog 410 N.W.2d 405 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • Van Gordon v. Herzog 410 N.W.2d 405 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    477-78 , (in action for injuries resulting from fall on icy spot in driveway of defendant’s grain elevator, “the jury could have found that plaintiff’s attention was distracted by the overflowing of the grain and that in his haste to correct the situation he was exercising due care under the circumstances when the accident occurred.”); Lincoln v. Cambridge-Radisson Co., 235 Minn. 20, 24 , (in action for injuries sustained in a fall in defendant’s lunchroom, “the jury could find that plaintiff, h
  • Krengel v. Midwest Automatic Photo, Inc. 203 N.W.2d 841 Minn. 1973
  • Krengel v. Midwest Automatic Photo, Inc. 203 N.W.2d 841 Minn. 1973
    Lincoln v. Cambridge-Radisson Co. 235 Minn. 20 , Mayzlik v. Lansing Elev.
  • Jensen v. Allied Central Stores, Inc. 167 N.W.2d 739 Minn. 1969
  • Jensen v. Allied Central Stores, Inc. 167 N.W.2d 739 Minn. 1969
    There are significant differences in Lincoln v. Cambridge-Radisson Co. 235 Minn. 20 , 49 N. W. (2d) 1 , on which plaintiff strongly relies.
  • Stephenson v. F. W. Woolworth Co. 152 N.W.2d 138 Minn. 1967
  • Stephenson v. F. W. Woolworth Co. 152 N.W.2d 138 Minn. 1967
    The defendant must show that the plaintiff had knowledge of the risk, Guile v. *193 Greenberg, 192 Minn. 548 , appreciated it, Mayzlik v. Lansing Elevator Co., 241 Minn. 468 , Lincoln v. Cambridge-Radisson Co., 235 Minn. 20 , and, having opportunity either to incur it or avoid it, voluntarily chose to incur it.
  • Cogswell v. U. S. S. Yorktown Post 178, VFW 143 N.W.2d 45 Minn. 1966
  • Cogswell v. U. S. S. Yorktown Post 178, VFW 143 N.W.2d 45 Minn. 1966
    See, Lyon v. Dr. Scholl’s Foot Comfort Shops, Inc. 251 Minn. 285 , 87 N. W. (2d) 651 ; Vosbeck v. Lerdall, 245 Minn. 164 , 72 N. W. (2d) 371 ; Lincoln v. Cambridge-Radisson Co. 235 Minn. 20 , 49 N. W. (2d) 1 ; Jewell v. Blanchett Investment Co. 199 Minn. 267 , ; Beckjord v. First Presbyterian Church, 196 Minn. 474 , .
  • Tonne v. Becker Grain & Lumber Company 139 N.W.2d 797 Minn. 1966
  • Tonne v. Becker Grain & Lumber Company 139 N.W.2d 797 Minn. 1966
    Ober v. The Golden Rule, 146 Minn. 347 , ; Theisen v. Minnesota Power & Light Co. 200 Minn. 515 , ; Dunham v. Hubert W. White, Inc. 203 Minn. 82 , ; Yeager v. Chapman, 233 Minn. 1 , 45 N. W. (2d) 776 , 22 A. L. R. (2d) 1260; Lincoln v. Cambridge-Radisson Co. 235 Minn. 20 , 49 N. W. (2d) 1 ; Johnson v. Brand Stores, Inc. 241 Minn. 388 , 63 N. W. (2d) 370 ; Zuercher v. Northern Jobbing Co. 243 Minn. 166 , 66 N. W. (2d) 892 ; Standafer v. First Nat.
  • Johnson v. R. E. Tapley, Inc. 136 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 1965
  • Johnson v. R. E. Tapley, Inc. 136 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 1965
    In Lincoln v. Cambridge-Radisson Co. 235 Minn. 20, 23 , 49 N. W. (2d) 1, 3 , the plaintiff was injured when she fell from a step adjacent to a cashier’s stand in a coffeeshop at a moment when she extended her hand to pay the check.
  • Saari v. S. S. Kresge Co. 101 N.W.2d 427 Minn. 1960
  • Saari v. S. S. Kresge Co. 101 N.W.2d 427 Minn. 1960
    1 Albachten v. The Golden Rule, 135 Minn. 381 , ; Ober v. The Golden Rule, 146 Minn. 347 , ; Schrader v. Kriesel, 232 Minn. 238 , 45 N. W. (2d) 395 ; Lincoln v. Cambridge-Radisson Co. 235 Minn. 20 , 49 N. W. (2d) 1 ; Messner v. Red Owl Stores, Inc. 238 Minn. 411 , 57 N. W. (2d) 659 .
  • Flynn v. Arcade Investment Co. 91 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 1958
  • Flynn v. Arcade Investment Co. 91 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 1958
    Co. 212 Minn. 551 , 4 N. W. (2d) 617 ; or without adequate illumination, Johnson v. Evanski, 221 Minn. 323 , 22 N. W. (2d) 213 ; or in a location where an invitee’s attention is diverted to other things, Lincoln v. Cambridge-Radisson Co. 235 Minn. 20 , 49 N. W. (2d) 1 , established negligence on the part of the building owner.
  • Rudd v. Village of Bovey 89 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1958
  • Rudd v. Village of Bovey 89 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1958
    Swenson v. Slawik, 236 Minn. 403 , 53 N. W. (2d) 107 ; Lincoln v. Cambridge-Radisson Co. 235 Minn. 20 , 49 N. W. (2d) 1 ; Schrader v. Kriesel, 232 Minn. 238 , 45 N. W. (2d) 395 ; Vosbeck v. Lerdall, 245 Minn. 164 , 72 N. W. (2d) 371 .
  • Vosbeck v. Lerdall 72 N.W.2d 371 Minn. 1955
  • Vosbeck v. Lerdall 72 N.W.2d 371 Minn. 1955
    Swenson v. Slawik, supra; Nubbe v. Hardy Continental Hotel System, supra; Lincoln v. Cambridge-Radisson Co. 235 Minn. 20 , 49 N. W. (2d) 1 ; Schrader v. Kriesel, 232 Minn. 238 , 45 N. W. (2d) 395 .
  • Ahlstrom v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad 68 N.W.2d 873 Minn. 1955
  • Ahlstrom v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad 68 N.W.2d 873 Minn. 1955
    See, Schrader v. Kriesel, supra; Lincoln v. Cambridge-Radisson Co. 235 Minn. 20 , 49 N. W. (2d) 1 .
  • Mayzlik v. Lansing Elevator Co. 63 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 1954
  • Mayzlik v. Lansing Elevator Co. 63 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 1954
    Lincoln v. Cambridge-Radisson Co. 235 Minn. 20 , 49 N. W. (2d) 1 .
  • Weller v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 58 N.W.2d 739 Minn. 1953
  • Weller v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 58 N.W.2d 739 Minn. 1953
    Lincoln v. CambridgeRadisson Co. 235 Minn. 20 , 49 N. W. (2d) 1 ; Spencer v. Johnson, 203 Minn. 402 , ; Campion v. City of Rochester, 202 Minn. 136 , ; Hack v. Johnson, 201 Minn. 9 , ; Coffman v. Kummer, 179 Minn. 120 , .
  • Messner v. Red Owl Stores, Inc. 57 N.W.2d 659 Minn. 1953
  • Messner v. Red Owl Stores, Inc. 57 N.W.2d 659 Minn. 1953
    Lincoln v. Cambridge-Radisson Co. 235 Minn. 20 , 49 N. W. (2d) 1 ; Schrader v. Kriesel, 232 Minn. 238 , 45 N. W. (2d) 395 ; Ober v. The Golden Rule, 146 Minn. 347 , ; Albachten v. The Golden Rule, 135 Minn. 381 , .
  • Swenson v. Slawik 53 N.W.2d 107 Minn. 1952
  • Swenson v. Slawik 53 N.W.2d 107 Minn. 1952
    Lincoln v. Cambridge-Radisson Co. 235 Minn. 20 , 49 N. W. (2d) 1 ; Schrader v. Kriesel, supra; Restatement, Torts, § 360, comment a. We have held that the use of defective premises with knowledge of their defective condition does not establish contributory negligence as a matter of law, particularly where it appears that the defective condition is not so obviously