Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Graf v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 49 N.W.2d 797.

44 citing documents.

Meagan Abel, Minn. 2020
See Graf v. Montgomery Ward & Co. , (discussing Restatement (First) of Agency § 220 (Am.
Ross v. Northern States Power Co. 442 N.W.2d 296 Minn. 1989
Ross v. Northern States Power Co. 442 N.W.2d 296 Minn. 1989
In Graf v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 234 Minn. 485 , the employee’s wife bathed him twice a day, served him meals, helped him to the bathroom, administered medication and massaged his legs.
Dalager v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. 350 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Dalager v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. 350 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Given that an identical relationship, between Wards and another roofer, was determined (although in a workers’ compensation context) to be one of master and servant in a case decided by the Minnesota Supreme Court, see Graf v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc., 234 Minn. 485 , the evidence of agency or non-agency was not conclusive.
Debold v. H. P. Martell & Sons 183 N.W.2d 283 Minn. 1971
Debold v. H. P. Martell & Sons 183 N.W.2d 283 Minn. 1971
No. 102, 251 Minn. 297 , 87 N. W. (2d) 646 ; Tretter v. Dart Transit Co. 271 Minn. 131 , 135 N. W. *116 (2d) 484; Graf v. Montgomery Ward & Co. 234 Minn. 485 , 49 N. W. (2d) 797 ; Mount v. City of Redwood Falls, 260 Minn. 16 , 108 N. W. (2d) 443 ; Geerdes v. J. R. Watkins Co. 258 Minn. 254 , 103 N. W. (2d) 641 ; Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co. 167 Minn. 72 , ; Lindbery v. J. A. Danens & Son, Inc. 266 Minn. 420 , 123 N. W. (2d) 695 .
Farnam v. Linden Hills Congregational Church 149 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1967
Farnam v. Linden Hills Congregational Church 149 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1967
Co. 186 Minn. 534 , ), roofing (Graf v. Montgomery Ward & Co. Inc. 234 Minn. 485 , 49 N. W. [2d] 797, 17 W. C. D. 5), and tree trimming on hospital grounds (Nathe v. Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate Conception, 21 W. C. D. 267), have all been held to be in the usual course of business conducted on those premises.
Lindbery v. J. A. Danens & Son, Inc. 123 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 1963
Lindbery v. J. A. Danens & Son, Inc. 123 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 1963
ability of an employer prescribed by this chapter is exclusive and in the place of any other liability to such employee, his personal representative, surviving spouse, parent, any child, dependent, n'ext of kin, or other person entitled to recover damages on account of such injury or death.” 3 Castner v. Christgau, 222 Minn. 61, 66 , 24 N. W. (2d) 228, 231 ; Graf v. Montgomery Ward & Co. Inc. 234 Minn. 485, 491 , 49 N. W. (2d) 797, 801 ; Restatement, Agency, § 220.
State v. Robinson 123 N.W.2d 812 Minn. 1963
Pettis v. Harken, Inc. 116 N.W.2d 565 Minn. 1962
Pettis v. Harken, Inc. 116 N.W.2d 565 Minn. 1962
*292 In Graf v. Montgomery Ward & Co. Inc. 234 Minn. 485, 491 , 49 N. W. (2d) 797, 801 , we said: “* * * In determining whether the relationship is one of employe or independent contractor, the most important factor is the right of the employer to control the means and manner of performance.
Fink v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 115 N.W.2d 22 Minn. 1962
Fink v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 115 N.W.2d 22 Minn. 1962
6 See, Chillstrom v. Trojan Seed Co. 242 Minn. 471 , 65 N. W. (2d) 888 ; Rinne v. W. C. Griffis Co. 234 Minn. 146 , 47 N. W. (2d) 872 ; Graf v. Montgomery Ward Co. Inc. 234 Minn. 485 , 49 N. W. (2d) 797 ; Jones v. Excelsior Laundry Co. 183 Minn. 531 , .
Mount v. City of Redwood Falls 108 N.W.2d 443 Minn. 1961
Mount v. City of Redwood Falls 108 N.W.2d 443 Minn. 1961
1 Korthuis v. Soderling & Sons, 218 Minn. 342 , 16 N. W. (2d) 285 ; Bergstrom v. Brehmer, 214 Minn. 326 , 8 N. W. (2d) 328 ; Graf v. Montgomery Ward & Co. 234 Minn. 485 , 49 N. W. (2d) 797 ; Fahey v. Terp, 235 Minn. 432 , 51 N. W. (2d) 273 ; Rosvold v. Independent Consol.
Geerdes v. J. R. Watkins Co. 103 N.W.2d 641 Minn. 1960
Geerdes v. J. R. Watkins Co. 103 N.W.2d 641 Minn. 1960
1 Nesseth v. Skelly Oil Co. 176 Minn. 373 , ; Olson v. Eck’s Homemade Sausage Co. 194 Minn. 458 , ; Korthuis v. Soderling & Sons, 218 Minn. 342 , 16 N. W. (2d) 285 (many of our prior cases are here collected); see, also, Koktavy v. City of New Prague, 246 Minn. 550 , 75 N. W. (2d) 774 ; Graf v. Montgomery Ward & Co. Inc. 234 Minn. 485 , 49 N. W. (2d) 797 ; Christopherson v. Security State Bank, 256 Minn. 191 , 97 N. W. (2d) 649 ; Salmond, Law of Torts (10 ed.) § 26, p. 84; Pollock, Torts
Lange v. Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission 99 N.W.2d 915 Minn. 1959
Lange v. Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission 99 N.W.2d 915 Minn. 1959
8 Sobczyk v. City of Duluth, 245 Minn. 569 , 73 N. W. (2d) 795 ; Graf v. Montgomery Ward & Co. Inc. 234 Minn. 485 , 49 N. W. (2d) 797 .
Sorensen v. P. H. Thompson & Son 79 N.W.2d 673 Minn. 1956
Sorensen v. P. H. Thompson & Son 79 N.W.2d 673 Minn. 1956
Graf v. Montgomery Ward & Co. Inc. 234 Minn. 485 , 49 N. W. (2d) 797 ; Baburic v. Butler Brothers, 233 Minn. 304 , 46 N. W. (2d) 661 .
Wanda Gladys Beach v. American Steel & Wire Division of United States Steel Corp. & State Treasurer 78 N.W.2d 371 Minn. 1956
Balow v. Kellogg Cooperative Creamery Association 78 N.W.2d 430 Minn. 1956
Balow v. Kellogg Cooperative Creamery Association 78 N.W.2d 430 Minn. 1956
Hansen v. Adent, 238 Minn. 540 , 57 N. W. (2d) 681 ; Graf v. Montgomery Ward & Co. Inc. 234 Minn. 485 , 49 N. W. (2d) 797 ; Fisher v. Fisher, 226 Minn. 171 , 32 N. W. (2d) 424 .
Distinguished Wanda Gladys Beach v. American Steel & Wire Division of United States Steel Corp. & State Treasurer 78 N.W.2d 371 Minn. 1956
1 Sobczyk v. City of Duluth, 245 Minn. 569 , 73 N. W. (2d) 795 ; Graf v. Montgomery Ward & Co. Inc. 234 Minn. 485 , 49 N. W. (2d) 797 .
Fleischer v. State Department of Highways 77 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 1956
Fleischer v. State Department of Highways 77 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 1956
Graf v. Montgomery Ward & Co. Inc. 234 Minn. 485 , 49 N. W. (2d) 797 ; Jurich v. Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Co. 233 Minn. 108 , 46 N. W. (2d) 237 ; Fisher v. Fisher, 226 Minn. 171 , 32 N. W. (2d) 424 ; Simpson v. Gold, 221 Minn. 528 , 22 N. W. (2d) 923 ; Zobitz v. City of Ely, 219 Minn. 411 , 18 N. W. (2d) 126 ; Bergstrom v. Brehmer, 214 Minn. 326 , 8 N. W. (2d) 328 ; Ca
Koktavy v. City of New Prague 75 N.W.2d 774 Minn. 1956
Koktavy v. City of New Prague 75 N.W.2d 774 Minn. 1956
2 Graf v. Montgomery Ward & Co. Inc. 234 Minn. 485 , 49 N. W. (2d) 797 .
Sobczyk v. City of Duluth 73 N.W.2d 795 Minn. 1955
Sobczyk v. City of Duluth 73 N.W.2d 795 Minn. 1955
& Supp. § 10426; Rinne v. W. C. Griffis Co. 234 Minn. 146 , 47 N. W. (2d) 872 ; Graf v. Montgomery Ward & Co. Inc. 234 Minn. 485 , 49 N. W. (2d) 797 .
Ahlstrom v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad 68 N.W.2d 873 Minn. 1955
Ahlstrom v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad 68 N.W.2d 873 Minn. 1955
606; see, Graf v. Montgomery Ward & Co. Inc. 234 Minn. 485 , 49 N. W. (2d) 797 ; Dahlin v. Kron, 232 Minn. 312 , 45 N. W. (2d) 833 ; 5 Dunnell, Dig.
Chillstrom v. Trojan Seed Co. 65 N.W.2d 888 Minn. 1954
Chillstrom v. Trojan Seed Co. 65 N.W.2d 888 Minn. 1954
227 Minn. 303 , 35 N. W. (2d) 430 ; Graf v. Montgomery Ward & Co. Inc. 234 Minn. 485 , 49 N. W. (2d) 797 ; Petro v. Martin Baking Co. 239 Minn. 307 , 58 N. W. (2d) 731 ; 6 Dunnell, Dig.
Petro v. Martin Baking Co. 58 N.W.2d 731 Minn. 1953
Petro v. Martin Baking Co. 58 N.W.2d 731 Minn. 1953
Graf v. Montgomery Ward & Co. Inc. 234 Minn. 485 , 49 N. W. (2d) 797 , and cases cited.
Fahey v. Terp 51 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1952
Fahey v. Terp 51 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1952
See, Graf v. Montgomery Ward & Co. Inc. 234 Minn. 485 , 49 N. W. (2d) 797 .
State ex rel. Ausdemore v. Catholic Welfare Ass'n 48 N.W.2d 313 Minn. 1951
State ex rel. Ausdemore v. Catholic Welfare Ass'n 48 N.W.2d 313 Minn. 1951
This case is distinguished from Graf v. Montgomery Ward & Co. Inc. 234 Minn. 485, 497 , 49 N. W. (2d) 797, 804 , in that there the matter considered involved only one order of the industrial commission.