DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Shell Oil Co. v. Kapler, 50 N.W.2d 707.

36 citing documents.

  • Michael Fosness, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
    Second, we are not convinced that enforcement of this contract is “unconscionable.” “Adequacy or inadequacy of consideration for the property sold is to be determined as of the inception of the contract rather than according to the increased or decreased value of 24 the property at the time of trial.”
  • Southcross Commerce Center, LLP v. Tupy Properties, LLC 766 N.W.2d 704 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
  • Southcross Commerce Center, LLP v. Tupy Properties, LLC 766 N.W.2d 704 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
    Jacobson v. $55,900 in U.S. Currency, (quoting Shell Oil Co. v. Kapler, 235 Minn. 292, 300 , ).
  • Jacobson v. $55,900 in U.S. Currency 728 N.W.2d 510 Minn. 2007
  • Jacobson v. $55,900 in U.S. Currency 728 N.W.2d 510 Minn. 2007
    Kapler, we characterized the burden of rebutting an evidentiary presumption as presenting essentially any “competent evidence.” [A] presumption is merely a procedural device for controlling the burden of going forward with the evidence!,] and * * * it has no additional function other than the limited one of dictating the decision where there is an entire lack of competent evidence to the contrary 235 Minn. 292, 300
  • Jones v. Amoco Oil Co. 483 N.W.2d 718 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
  • Jones v. Amoco Oil Co. 483 N.W.2d 718 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
    Shell Oil Co. v. Kapler, 235 Minn. 292, 298 , (emphasis in original).
  • In Re Estate of Beecham 378 N.W.2d 800 Minn. 1985
  • In Re Estate of Beecham 378 N.W.2d 800 Minn. 1985
    Kath v. Kath, 238 Minn. 120, 124 , -94 (1952); Shell Oil Co. v. Kapler, 235 Minn. 292, 300
  • Century 21-Birdsell Realty, Inc. v. Hiebel 379 N.W.2d 201 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Century 21-Birdsell Realty, Inc. v. Hiebel 379 N.W.2d 201 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    (quoting Shell Oil Company v. Kapler, 235 Minn. 292, 298 , ).
  • ERA Town & Country Realty, Inc. v. TEVAC, Inc. 376 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • ERA Town & Country Realty, Inc. v. TEVAC, Inc. 376 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    to command the requisite funds at the required time, or (3) if he has definitely arranged to raise the necessary money— or as much thereof as he is unable to supply personally — by obtaining a binding commitment for a loan to him for that purpose by a financially able third party, irrespective of whether such loan be secured in part by the property to be purchased * * * ” Shell Oil Co. v. Kapler, 235 Minn. 292, 298 , (emphasis added; footnotes omitted).
  • United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America 681 P.2d 390 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
  • Thoe v. Rasmussen 322 N.W.2d 775 Minn. 1982
  • Halverson v. Village of Deerwood 322 N.W.2d 761 Minn. 1982
  • Halverson v. Village of Deerwood 322 N.W.2d 761 Minn. 1982
    Shell Oil Co. v. Kapler, 235 Minn. 292, 301
  • Thoe v. Rasmussen 322 N.W.2d 775 Minn. 1982
    Shell Oil Co. v. Kapler, 235 Minn. 292, 301 , accord, Southdale Center, Inc. v. Lewis, 260 Minn. 430
  • Neubauer v. Cloutier 122 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 1963
  • Neubauer v. Cloutier 122 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 1963
    When the consideration, exclusive of the value of any lien or encumbrance remaining thereon at the time of sale, exceeds $1,000, the tax shall be $1.10 plus 55 cents for each $500 or fractional part of $500 in excess of $1,000.” 9 Suske v. Straka, 229 Minn. 408 , 39 N. W. (2d) 745 ; Shell Oil Co. v. Kapler, 235 Minn. 292 , 50 N. W. (2d) 707 ; Kath v. Kath, 238 Minn. 120 , 55 N. W. (2d) 691 .
  • Southdale Center, Inc. v. Lewis 110 N.W.2d 857 Minn. 1961
  • Southdale Center, Inc. v. Lewis 110 N.W.2d 857 Minn. 1961
    Co. v. Clarkson Securities Co. 205 Minn. 517, 520 , ; Shell Oil Co. v. Kapler, 235 Minn. 292, 301 , 50 N. W. (2d) 707, 714 ; In re Estate of Arnt, 237 Minn. 245, 251 , 54 N. W. (2d) 333, 337 .
  • Caldis v. Curtis Hotel Co. 95 N.W.2d 641 Minn. 1959
  • Caldis v. Curtis Hotel Co. 95 N.W.2d 641 Minn. 1959
    See, also, Shell Oil Co. v. Kapler, 235 Minn. 292 , 50 N. W. (2d) 707 .
  • Bailie v. Ridker 81 N.W.2d 798 Minn. 1957
  • Bailie v. Ridker 81 N.W.2d 798 Minn. 1957
    Shell Oil Co. v. Kapler, 235 Minn. 292, 298 , 50 N. W. (2d) 707, 712 .
  • Caballero v. Litchfield Wood-Working Co. Inc. 74 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 1956
  • Caballero v. Litchfield Wood-Working Co. Inc. 74 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 1956
    What is substantial evidence under Shell Oil Co. v. Kapler, 235 Minn. 292, 300 , 50 N. W. (2d) 707, 713 , needs clarification.
  • Pearson v. Bertelson 69 N.W.2d 621 Minn. 1955
  • Pearson v. Bertelson 69 N.W.2d 621 Minn. 1955
    Co. 207 Minn. 131 , ; Shell Oil Co. v. Kapler, 235 Minn. 292, 300-301 , 50 N. W. (2d) 707, 713-714 ; cf. In re Estate of Eklund, 233 Minn. 519 , 47 N. W. (2d) 422 .
  • Kath v. Kath 55 N.W.2d 691 Minn. 1952
  • Kath v. Kath 55 N.W.2d 691 Minn. 1952
    4 See, Shell Oil Co. v. Kapler, 235 Minn. 292 , 50 N. W. (2d) 707 ; TePoel v. Larson, 236 Minn. 482 , 53 N. W. (2d) 468 .
  • Mitchell v. Morten 54 N.W.2d 333 Minn. 1952
  • Mitchell v. Morten 54 N.W.2d 333 Minn. 1952
    However, the general rule is subject to the exception recently referred to by this court in Shell Oil Co. v. Kapler, 235 Minn. 292, 301 , 50 N. W. (2d) 707, 714 , wherein we stated: * * As an appellate court, we do not make or amend findings or even direct that it be done where the facts are in dispute.
  • Knuth v. Murphy 54 N.W.2d 771 Minn. 1952
  • Knuth v. Murphy 54 N.W.2d 771 Minn. 1952
    See, Shell Oil Co. v. Kapler, 235 Minn. 292 , and cases cited in footnote 5, 50 N. W. (2d) 707, 713 , and cases cited in footnote 4.