DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Norton v. Nelson, 53 N.W.2d 31.

38 citing documents.

  • Computer Tool & Engineering, Inc. v. Northern States Power Co. 453 N.W.2d 569 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
  • Computer Tool & Engineering, Inc. v. Northern States Power Co. 453 N.W.2d 569 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
    Norton v. Nelson, 236 Minn. 237, 243
  • Davis v. Liesenfeld 240 N.W.2d 548 Minn. 1976
  • Davis v. Liesenfeld 240 N.W.2d 548 Minn. 1976
    See, Norton v. Nelson, 236 Minn. 237, 244 , Koenigs v. Werner, 269 Minn. 530, 533
  • Eklund v. Lund 222 N.W.2d 348 Minn. 1974
  • Eklund v. Lund 222 N.W.2d 348 Minn. 1974
    1.” Norton v. Nelson, 236 Minn. 237, 244
  • Merrill v. Kjelgren 160 N.W.2d 155 Minn. 1968
  • Merrill v. Kjelgren 160 N.W.2d 155 Minn. 1968
    McMillen v. Meyer, 246 Minn. 132 , 74 *460 N. W. (2d) 393; Norton v. Nelson, 236 Minn. 237 , 53 N. W. (2d) 31 ; Coble v. Lacey, 252 Minn. 423 , 90 N. W. (2d) 314 ; 8B Dunnell, Dig.
  • Nelson v. Holand 139 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 1965
  • Nelson v. Holand 139 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 1965
    See, Norton v. Nelson, 236 Minn. 237 , 53 N. W. (2d) 31 , and cases cited therein.
  • Pogalz v. Kenna 126 N.W.2d 458 Minn. 1964
  • Pogalz v. Kenna 126 N.W.2d 458 Minn. 1964
    Norton v. Nelson, 236 Minn. 237 , 53 N. W. (2d) 31 .
  • Wagenhals v. Flint 114 N.W.2d 641 Minn. 1962
  • Wagenhals v. Flint 114 N.W.2d 641 Minn. 1962
    Norton v. Nelson, 236 Minn. 237, 241 , 53 N. W. (2d) 31, 34 ; Dosdall v. Swift & Co. 238 Minn. 283, 285 , 56 N. W. (2d) 433, 435 ; Carpenter v. Brikholm, 242 Minn. 379, 386 , 65 N. W. (2d) 250, 254 .
  • Wolle v. Jorgenson 99 N.W.2d 57 Minn. 1959
  • Wolle v. Jorgenson 99 N.W.2d 57 Minn. 1959
    Co. 242 Minn. 388 , 65 N. W. (2d) 661 ; Norton v. Nelson, 236 Minn. 237 , 53 N. W. (2d) 31 , in support thereof, and directing attention to the fact that in Norton v. Nelson, supra, this court expressed the exact rule included in the requested instruction.
  • Burdick v. Bongard 96 N.W.2d 868 Minn. 1959
  • Burdick v. Bongard 96 N.W.2d 868 Minn. 1959
    1 Schleuder v. Soltow, 239 Minn. 453 , 59 N. W. (2d) 320 ; Leitner v. Pacific Gamble Robinson Co. 223 Minn. 260 , 26 N. W. (2d) 228 ; Dose v. Yager, 231 Minn. 90 , 42 N. W. (2d) 420 ; Norton v. Nelson, 236 Minn. 237 , 53 N. W. (2d) 31 .
  • Norby v. Klukow 81 N.W.2d 776 Minn. 1957
  • Norby v. Klukow 81 N.W.2d 776 Minn. 1957
    Norton v. Nelson, 236 Minn. 237, 241 , 53 N. W. (2d) 31, 34 .
  • Jablinske v. Eckstrom 76 N.W.2d 654 Minn. 1956
  • Jablinske v. Eckstrom 76 N.W.2d 654 Minn. 1956
    4 Jeddeloh v. Hockenhull, 219 Minn. 541 , 18 N. W. (2d) 582 ; Webber v. Seymour, 236 Minn. 10 , 51 N. W. (2d) 825 ; Tegels v. Tegels, 177 Minn. 222 , ; Norton v. Nelson, 236 Minn. 237 , 53 N. W. (2d) 31 ; Krinke v. Gramer, 187 Minn. 595 , .
  • Storbakken v. Soderberg 75 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 1956
  • Storbakken v. Soderberg 75 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 1956
    1, and, as we stated in Norton v. Nelson, 236 Minn. 237, 244 , 53 N. W. (2d) 31 , 36: “The failure to drive at an appropriate reduced speed in compliance with § 169.14, subd.
  • Markle v. Haase 73 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 1955
  • Markle v. Haase 73 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 1955
    5 Cf. Muggenburg v. Leighton, 241 Minn. 498 , 63 N. W. (2d) 533 ; Norton v. Nelson, 236 Minn. 237 , 53 N. W. (2d) 31 ; Fickling v. Nassif, 208 Minn. 538 , .
  • Davies v. Land O' Lakes Racing Ass'n 69 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1955
  • Davies v. Land O' Lakes Racing Ass'n 69 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1955
    Co. 181 Minn. 406 , ; see, Norton v. Nelson, 236 Minn. 237 , 53 N. W. (2d) 31 .
  • Butler v. Engel 68 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 1954
  • Butler v. Engel 68 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 1954
    Fisher v. Clarkson, 233 Minn. 318 , 46 N. W. (2d) 665 ; Norton v. Nelson, 236 Minn. 237 , 53 N. W. (2d) 31 .
  • Adelmann v. Elk River Lumber Co. 65 N.W.2d 661 Minn. 1954
  • Adelmann v. Elk River Lumber Co. 65 N.W.2d 661 Minn. 1954
    3, provides: “The driver of any vehicle shall, consistent with the requirements, drive at an appropriate reduced speed when approaching and crossing an intersection * * * and when special hazards exist with respect to pedestrians or other traffic or by reason of weather or highway conditions.” 3 See, Neal v. Neal, 238 Minn. 292 , 56 N. W. (2d) 673 ; cf. Norton v. Nelson, 236 Minn. 237 , 53 N. W. (2d) 31 ; Hustvet v. Kuusinen, 184 Minn. 222 , ; Norling v. Stempf, 208 Minn. 143 , .
  • Bielinski v. Colwell 65 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 1954
  • Bielinski v. Colwell 65 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 1954
    Knuth v. Murphy, 237 Minn. 225 , 54 N. W. (2d) 771 ; Norton v. Nelson, 236 Minn. 237 , 53 N. W. (2d) 31 ; Russell v. Winters, 185 Minn. 472 , .
  • Schleuder v. Soltow 59 N.W.2d 320 Minn. 1953
  • Schleuder v. Soltow 59 N.W.2d 320 Minn. 1953
    Leitner v. Pacific Gamble Robinson Co. 223 Minn. 260 , 26 N. W. (2d) 228 ; Dose v. Yager, 231 Minn. 90 , 42 N. W. (2d) 420 ; Norton v. Nelson, 236 Minn. 237 , 53 N. W. (2d) 31 .
  • Neal v. Neal 56 N.W.2d 673 Minn. 1953
  • Neal v. Neal 56 N.W.2d 673 Minn. 1953
    Cf. Norton v. Nelson, 236 Minn. 237 , 53 N. W. (2d) 31 ; Katlaba v. Pfeifer, 238 Minn. 298 , 56 N. W. (2d) 725 .