Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Sylvester v. Northwestern Hospital of Minneapolis, 53 N.W.2d 17.

47 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Travis Elledge Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Travis Elledge Minn. Ct. App. 2015
of Minneapolis, 236 Minn. 384, 388, (“The seriousness and the frequency of the harm that an intoxicated person is likely to cause third persons has become so well recognized.”).
Becker v. Mayo Foundation 737 N.W.2d 200 Minn. 2007
Larson v. Wasemiller 738 N.W.2d 300 Minn. 2007
Becker v. Mayo Foundation 737 N.W.2d 200 Minn. 2007
See Clements v. Swedish Hosp., 252 Minn. 1 , (holding that a hospital does not assume responsibility for treatment of a patient’s mental disturbance leading to a suicide attempt when the patient is admitted for treatment of injuries sustained in an automobile accident); Sylvester v. Northwestern Hosp., 236 Minn. 384, 386 , (holding that a hospital is liable for damages suffered by one of its patients when another patient assaults her because the reasonable care to be exercised by a hospital “mus
Larson v. Wasemiller 738 N.W.2d 300 Minn. 2007
286 Minn. 384, 389-90 , -21 (1952).
Bjerke v. Johnson 727 N.W.2d 183 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Bjerke v. Johnson 727 N.W.2d 183 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
of Minneapolis, 236 Minn. 384 , (stating that knowledge that patient had habit of wandering on hospital grounds while intoxicated sufficient to find hospital liable for assault of another patient, in light of “experience of mankind” that intoxication causes people to become a hazard to others).
Cooney v. Hooks 535 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 1995
Cooney v. Hooks 535 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 1995
of Minneapolis, 236 Minn. 384
K.L. v. Riverside Medical Center 524 N.W.2d 300 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
K.L. v. Riverside Medical Center 524 N.W.2d 300 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
of Mpls., 236 Minn. 384 , a patient was injured by an intoxicated patient.
Doe v. Brainerd International Raceway, Inc. 514 N.W.2d 811 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Doe v. Brainerd International Raceway, Inc. 514 N.W.2d 811 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
of Minneapolis, 236 Minn. 384, 386-87 , Roettger v. United Hosps.
Tomfohr v. Mayo Foundation 450 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1990
Tomfohr v. Mayo Foundation 450 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1990
In Mounds Park, although the issue of the fault of the mentally ill patient who had jumped from a hospital window was never discussed, the court, largely in reliance on Sylvester v. Northwestern Hosp., 236 Minn. 384 , defined the scope of the hospital’s duty toward a mentally ill patient: While a hospital is not an insurer of a patient’s safety it owes its patients the duty of protection and must exercise such reasonable care toward a patient as his known condition may require and the duty of ca
Erickson v. Curtis Investment Co. 447 N.W.2d 165 Minn. 1989
Erickson v. Curtis Investment Co. 447 N.W.2d 165 Minn. 1989
of Minneapolis, 236 Minn. 384, 386-87 , Roettger v. United Hospitals of St.
Alholm v. Wilt 394 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1986
Alholm v. Wilt 394 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1986
Even in Sylvester v. Northwestern Hospital of Minneapolis, 236 Minn. 384, 386-88 , (which was not an innkeeper liability case) relied upon by appellant, we restated that the appropriate standard was that of the use of reasonable care under the circumstances.
Kanter v. Metropolitan Medical Center 384 N.W.2d 914 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Alholm v. Wilt 380 N.W.2d 851 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Alholm v. Wilt 380 N.W.2d 851 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Appellant’s reliance on Sylvester v. Northwestern Hospital, 236 Minn. 384 , for the proposition that tavern owners must exercise the highest degree of care is misplaced.
Roettger v. United Hospitals of St. Paul, Inc. 380 N.W.2d 856 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Roettger v. United Hospitals of St. Paul, Inc. 380 N.W.2d 856 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Sylvester v. Northwestern Hospital of Minneapolis, 236 Minn. 384 , a patient sued a hospital for failing to protect him from injuries caused by the violence of another patient who was intoxicated.
Alholm v. Wilt 348 N.W.2d 106 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Alholm v. Wilt 348 N.W.2d 106 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
See, e.g., Klingbeil v. Truesdell, 256 Minn. 360 , Priewe v. Bartz, 249 Minn. 488 , Sylvester v. Northwestern Hospital of Minneapolis, 236 Minn. 384
Rum River Lumber Co. v. State 282 N.W.2d 882 Minn. 1979
Rum River Lumber Co. v. State 282 N.W.2d 882 Minn. 1979
In Sylvester v. Northwestern Hospital of Minneapolis, 236 Minn. 384 , a patient in a private hospital had been injured by another patient who was intoxicated at the time.
Filas v. Daher 218 N.W.2d 467 Minn. 1974
Filas v. Daher 218 N.W.2d 467 Minn. 1974
In Sylvester v. Northwestern Hospital, 236 Minn. 384 , 53 N. W. (2d) 17 ; Windorski v. Doyle, supra; Priewe v. Bartz, supra; and *142 Klingbeil v. Truesdell, 256 Minn. 360 , 98 N. W. (2d) 134 , the person causing the harm was known to the defendant to be likely to do so because of his intoxication and manifestations of an inclination to fight and to cause trouble.
Trail v. Christian 213 N.W.2d 618 Minn. 1973
Trail v. Christian 213 N.W.2d 618 Minn. 1973
Sylvester v. Northwestern Hospital, 236 Minn. 384, 389
Trepanier v. McKenna 125 N.W.2d 603 Minn. 1963
Trepanier v. McKenna 125 N.W.2d 603 Minn. 1963
2 Mulliner v. Evangelischer Diakonniessenverein, 144 Minn. 392 , ; Quick v. Benedictine Sisters Hospital Assn. 257 Minn. 470 , 102 N. W. (2d) 36 ; Sylvester v. Northwestern Hospital, 236 Minn. 384 , 53 N. W. (2d) 17 ; Swigerd v. City of Ortonville, 246 Minn. 339 , 75 N. W. (2d) 217 , 72 A. L. R. (2d) 398.
Quick v. Benedictine Sisters Hospital Assn. 102 N.W.2d 36 Minn. 1960
Quick v. Benedictine Sisters Hospital Assn. 102 N.W.2d 36 Minn. 1960
3 See, Sylvester v. Northwestern Hospital, 236 Minn. 384 , 53 N. W. (2d) 17 .
Klingbeil v. Truesdell 98 N.W.2d 134 Minn. 1959
Swanson v. the Dugout, Inc. 98 N.W.2d 213 Minn. 1959
Swanson v. the Dugout, Inc. 98 N.W.2d 213 Minn. 1959
In Sylvester v. Northwestern Hospital, 236 Minn. 384 , 53 N. W. (2d) 17 ; Windorski v. Doyle, supra; Priewe v. Bartz, supra; and Klingbeil v. Truesdell, 256 Minn. 360 , 98 N. W. (2d) 134 , the person causing the harm was known to the defendant to be likely to do so because of his intoxication and manifestations of an inclination to fight and to cause trouble.
Klingbeil v. Truesdell 98 N.W.2d 134 Minn. 1959
Jur., Intoxicating Liquors, § 609; Curran v. Olson, 88 Minn. 307, 308 , , 60 L. R. A. 733; Mastad v. Swedish Brethren, 83 Minn. 40 , , 53 L. R. A. 803; Christianson v. Hager, 242 Minn. 41 , 64 N. W. (2d) 35 ; Klaman v. Hitchcock, 181 Minn. 109 , ; Sylvester v. Northwestern Hospital, 236 Minn. 384, 389 , 53 N. W. (2d) 17, 20 ; Cherbonnier v. Rafalovich (D. Alaska) 88 F. Supp. 900 ; Annotation, 29 A. L. R. (2d) 911; Windorski v. Doyle, 219 Minn. 402 , 18 N. W. (2d) 142 .” We further observed that
Ruehling v. American Legion Pavilion, Inc. 96 N.W.2d 702 Minn. 1959
Ruehling v. American Legion Pavilion, Inc. 96 N.W.2d 702 Minn. 1959
2 Connolly v. The Nicollet Hotel, 254 Minn. 373 , 95 N. W. (2d) 657 ; Sylvester v. Northwestern Hospital, 236 Minn. 384 , 53 N. W. (2d) 17 ; Johnson v. Evanski, 221 Minn. 323 , 22 N. W. (2d) 213 ; Landru v. Stensrud, 219 Minn. 227 , 17 N. W. (2d) 322 ; Dunham v. Hubert W. White, Inc. 203 Minn. 82 , ; Pfeifer v. Standard Gateway Theater, Inc. 259 Wis.
Priewe v. Bartz 83 N.W.2d 116 Minn. 1957
Priewe v. Bartz 83 N.W.2d 116 Minn. 1957
Jur., Intoxicating Liquors, § 609; Curran v. Olson, 88 Minn. 307, 308 , , 60 L. R. A. 733; Mastad v. Swedish Brethren, 83 Minn. 40 , , 53 L. R. A. 803; Christianson v. Hager, 242 Minn. 41 , 64 N. W. (2d) 35 ; Klaman v. Hitchcock, 181 Minn. 109 , ; Sylvester v. Northwestern Hospital, 236 Minn. 384, 389 , 53 N. W. (2d) 17, 20 ; Cherbonnier v. Rafalovich (D. Alaska) 88 F. Supp. 900 ; Annotation, 29 A. L. R. (2d) 911; Windorski v. Doyle, 219 Minn. 402 , 18 N. W. (2d) 142 .
Hahn v. City of Ortonville 57 N.W.2d 254 Minn. 1953
Hahn v. City of Ortonville 57 N.W.2d 254 Minn. 1953
4 Cf. Sylvester v. Northwestern Hospital, 236 Minn. 384 , 53 N. W. (2d) 17 ; State v. Graham, 176 Minn. 164 , .