Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Georgopolis v. George, 54 N.W.2d 137.

42 citing documents.

David Levy, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(“[I]n an equitable action it is within the discretion of the [district] court to submit some questions of fact to the jury.”); State Bank of Round Lake v. Riley, 224 N.W.
David Carl Hepfl, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Paul Herlache, Minn. 2023
The measure of relief for an unjust enrichment claim “is based on what the person allegedly enriched has received, not on what the opposing party has lost.”
Christensen Law Office, PLLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“The theory of unjust enrichment is based on what the person allegedly enriched has received, not on what the opposing party has lost.” Georgopolis v. George , 237 Minn. 176, 185
Langford Tool & Drill Co. v. The 401 Group, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Langford Tool & Drill Co. v. The 401 Group, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2015
But in an unjust-enrichment case, damages are measured by “what the person allegedly enriched has received, not on what the opposing party has lost.” Georgopolis v. George, 237 Minn. 176, 185, d 137, 142 (1952); review denied (Minn. Nov.
Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc. 820 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 2012
Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc. 820 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 2012
ng that lessee could recover on theory of unjust enrichment a portion of condemnation award from lessor intended to reimburse for real estate taxes); Cady v. Bush, 283 Minn. 105, 110 , -62 (1969) (concluding that unjust enrichment did not apply when purchasers of motel attempted to recover, upon cancellation of the contract, cash payments made to seller); Georgopolis v. George, 237 Minn. 176, 185-86 , -43 (1952) (concluding that findings supported denying establishment of a constructive trust on
Freundschuh v. Freundschuh 559 N.W.2d 706 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Freundschuh v. Freundschuh 559 N.W.2d 706 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
at 375-76 (holding where plaintiff and her sister provided funds for purchase of land and title taken in name of plaintiff and defendant, statute prohibiting resulting trusts requires confirmation of title of defendant to undivided one-half interest in property); but cf. Georgopolis v. George, 237 Minn. 176, 183-85 , -42 (1952) (in apparent anomaly, without citing section 501.07, supreme court stated evidence as to resulting trust could be established by parol evidence, but affirmed trial court
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Alpine Air Products, Inc. 490 N.W.2d 888 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Alpine Air Products, Inc. 490 N.W.2d 888 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Georgopolis v. George, 237 Minn. 176, 186
Uselman v. Uselman 464 N.W.2d 130 Minn. 1990
Uselman v. Uselman 464 N.W.2d 130 Minn. 1990
While actions for a breach of trust lie in equity and the trial court may, in its discretion, submit any questions of fact to a jury, Georgopolis v. George, 237 Minn. 176, 186 , the general rule is that “the remedies of the beneficiary against the trustee are exclusively equitable.” Restatement (Second) Trusts § 197 (1959); see, e.g., First Alabama Bank of Huntsville, N.A.
City of Savage v. Formanek 459 N.W.2d 173 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
City of Savage v. Formanek 459 N.W.2d 173 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
See Georgopolis v. George, 237 Minn. 176, 182 , (appellate court must use all possible inferences supporting the findings).
In Re the Welfare of C.K. 426 N.W.2d 842 Minn. 1988
In Re the Welfare of C.K. 426 N.W.2d 842 Minn. 1988
Georgopolis v. George, 237 Minn. 176, 182
Park-Lake Car Wash, Inc. v. Springer 394 N.W.2d 505 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Park-Lake Car Wash, Inc. v. Springer 394 N.W.2d 505 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Georgoplis v. George, 237 Minn. 176, 182
Noble v. C.E.D.O., Inc. 374 N.W.2d 734 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Noble v. C.E.D.O., Inc. 374 N.W.2d 734 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Georgopolis v. George, 237 Minn. 176, 186
In Re the Welfare of L.M.M. 372 N.W.2d 431 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of L.M.M. 372 N.W.2d 431 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See Georgopolis v. George, 237 Minn. 176
Reis v. Commissioner of Public Safety 358 N.W.2d 740 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Reis v. Commissioner of Public Safety 358 N.W.2d 740 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Georgopolis v. George, 237 Minn. 176, 182
Anderson v. DeLisle 352 N.W.2d 794 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Anderson v. DeLisle 352 N.W.2d 794 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Zirinsky, 413 F.2d at 489 , Georgopolis v. George, 237 Minn. 176, 185
National Indemnity Co. v. Mutual Service Casualty Co. 311 N.W.2d 856 Minn. 1981
National Indemnity Co. v. Mutual Service Casualty Co. 311 N.W.2d 856 Minn. 1981
Georgopolis v. George, 237 Minn. 176
Schwerm v. Schwerm 175 N.W.2d 427 Minn. 1970
Schwerm v. Schwerm 175 N.W.2d 427 Minn. 1970
See, also, Georgopolis v. George, 237 Minn. 176 , 54 N. W. (2d) 137 ; and Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387 , 35 N. W. (2d) 542 , 6 A. L. R. (2d) 176.
Thompson v. Nesheim 159 N.W.2d 910 Minn. 1968
Thompson v. Nesheim 159 N.W.2d 910 Minn. 1968
In Georgopolis v. George, 237 Minn. 176 , 54 N. W. (2d) 137 , cited and relied upon by defendants, the court held that there must be clear and satisfactory evidence to justify an imposition of a constructive trust.
Gaertner v. Rees 107 N.W.2d 365 Minn. 1961
Gaertner v. Rees 107 N.W.2d 365 Minn. 1961
See, McLellan v. Stevens, 176 Minn. 419 , ; S. Bader & Sons v. Gensler, 191 Minn. 571 , ; Georgopolis v. George, 237 Minn. 176 , 54 N. W. (2d) 137 ; Lehman v. Hansord Pontiac Co. Inc. 246 Minn. 1 , 74 N. W. (2d) 305 ; 1 Dunnell, Dig.
Bosch v. Meeker Cooperative Light & Power Assn. 91 N.W.2d 148 Minn. 1958
Bosch v. Meeker Cooperative Light & Power Assn. 91 N.W.2d 148 Minn. 1958
Georgopolis v. George, 237 Minn. 176 , 54 N. W. (2d) 137 .
Lehman v. Hansord Pontiac Co. Inc. 74 N.W.2d 305 Minn. 1955
Lehman v. Hansord Pontiac Co. Inc. 74 N.W.2d 305 Minn. 1955
McLellan v. Stevens, 176 Minn. 419 , ; S. Bader & Sons v. Gensler, 191 Minn. 571 , ; Georgopolis v. George, 237 Minn. 176 , 54 N. W. (2d) 137 ; 1 Dunnell, Dig.
Albertson v. Albertson 67 N.W.2d 463 Minn. 1954
Albertson v. Albertson 67 N.W.2d 463 Minn. 1954
4 Georgopolis v. George, 237 Minn. 176 , 54 N. W. (2d) 137 ; Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387 , 35 N. W. (2d) 542 , 6 A. L. R. (2d) 176.