Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Northern States Power Co. v. Oslund, 51 N.W.2d 808.

25 citing documents.

The City of Minneapolis, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
4 “‘Necessary’ need not be ‘absolute or indispensable necessity.’ The condemning authority need only show that the proposed taking is ‘reasonabl y necessary or convenient’ for furtherance of the end in view.” (quoting N. States Power Co. v. Oslund, 236 Minn. 135, 137, ).
Lundell v. COOPERATIVE POWER ASS'N 707 N.W.2d 376 Minn. 2006
Lundell v. COOPERATIVE POWER ASS'N 707 N.W.2d 376 Minn. 2006
CPA need not determine that there is absolute necessity, only that the taking is “reasonably necessary or convenient for the furtherance of the end in view.” N. States Power Co. v. Oslund, 236 Minn. 135, 137 , (footnote omitted).
UNIV. OF MN v. Chicago and NW Transp. 552 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Regents of the University of Minnesota v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co. 552 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
UNIV. OF MN v. Chicago and NW Transp. 552 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
§ 117.075 (1994); cf. Northern States Power Co. v. Oslund, 236 Minn. 135, 137 , ("The foundation[al] idea upon which the right of eminent domain rests is public necessity.").
Regents of the University of Minnesota v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co. 552 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
§ 117.075 (1994); cf. Northern States Power Co. v. Oslund, 236 Minn. 135, 137 , (“The foundation[aI] idea upon which the right of eminent domain rests is public necessity.”).
City of New Ulm v. Schultz 356 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
City of New Ulm v. Schultz 356 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Northern States Power Co. v. Oslund, 236 Minn. 135, 137
City of Shakopee v. Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative 303 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 1981
City of Shakopee v. Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative 303 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 1981
We have said a condemner satisfies its burden of proof when it shows a proposed taking is “reasonably necessary or convenient for the furtherance of the end in view.” Stauffenburg, d at 650 (emphasis in original); Northern States Power Co. v. Oslund, 236 Minn. 135, 137
City of New Prague, County of Scoot v. Hendricks 286 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1979
City of New Prague, County of Scoot v. Hendricks 286 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1979
enberg, : “Although lands may not be taken by eminent domain unless such taking appears to be necessary, it is well settled in this jurisdiction that there need be no showing of absolute or indispensable necessity, but only that the proposed taking is reasonably necessary or convenient for the furtherance of the end in view.” [quoting Northern States Power Co. v. Oslund, 236 Minn. 135, 137 , emphasis in original.]
County of Blue Earth v. Stauffenberg 264 N.W.2d 647 Minn. 1978
County of Blue Earth v. Stauffenberg 264 N.W.2d 647 Minn. 1978
Appellants contend that the evidence heard by the district court does not sustain its finding that the taking of their land was “necessary.” As we said in Northern States Power Co. v. Oslund, 236 Minn. 135, 137 , , : “ * * * Although lands may not be taken by eminent domain unless such taking appears to be necessary, it is well settled in this jurisdiction that there need be no showing of absolute or indispensable necessity, but only that the proposed taking is reasonably necessary
Metropolitan Sewer Board v. Thiss 200 N.W.2d 396 Minn. 1972
Metropolitan Sewer Board v. Thiss 200 N.W.2d 396 Minn. 1972
3 State, by Head, v. Christopher, 284 Minn. 233 , Northern States Power Co. v. Oslund, 236 Minn. 135
State v. Red Owl Stores, Inc. 115 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 1962
State v. Red Owl Stores, Inc. 115 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 1962
Northern States Power Co. v. Oslund, 236 Minn. 135, 141 , 51 N. W. (2d) 808 , 52 N. W. (2d) 717 , 718.
Volden v. Selke 87 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1958
Volden v. Selke 87 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1958
248 Minn. 556 , 82 N. W. (2d) 56 ; Northern States Power Co. v. Oslund, 236 Minn. 135 , 51 N. W. (2d) 808 , 52 N. W. (2d) 717 ; Burnquist v. Cook, 220 Minn. 48, 62 , 19 N. W. (2d) 394, 401 .
Chicago Great Western Railway Co. v. Jesse 82 N.W.2d 227 Minn. 1957
Chicago Great Western Railway Co. v. Jesse 82 N.W.2d 227 Minn. 1957
In Northern States Power Co. v. Oslund, 236 Minn. 135 , 51 N. W. (2d) 808 , 52 N. W. (2d) 717 , our court stated that lands may not be taken by eminent domain unless such taking appears to be necessary.
In Re Condemnation by Dairyland Power Cooperative 82 N.W.2d 56 Minn. 1957
In Re Condemnation by Dairyland Power Cooperative 82 N.W.2d 56 Minn. 1957
ing capacity of the line from an estimated 100,000 KW to approximately 70,000 KW, would cost an estimated $221,000.00 more to originally construct (at an estimated rate of $17,000.00 per mile), and would create not only greater exposure to outage creating weather elements, but would also create proportionately additional maintenance expense for the future.” In Northern States Power Co. v. Oslund, 236 Minn. 135 , 51 N. W. (2d) 808 , 52 N. W. (2d) 717 , we held that there is no need for a showing