Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 53 N.W.2d 454.

150 citing documents.

Kimi Bragdon, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Davis contends that reversal of the default judgment is appropriate based on Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., -56 (Minn. 1952).
Les Grumdahl Window & Siding LLC, A Minnesota Limited Liability Company v. Holly Brown, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Les Grumdahl Window & Siding LLC, A Minnesota Limited Liability Company v. Holly Brown, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co.
In re the Marriage of: Brenda Anne Kiberu-Kalema, n/k/a/ Brenda Anne Kiberu, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
17, 2001) ; (“We conclude that a district court does not abuse 7 Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., see also Northland Temps., rev. denied (Minn. Apr.
In re the Matter of: David Allen Engh, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co.
Buck Blacktop, Inc. v. Gary Contracting and Trucking Company, LLC 929 N.W.2d 12 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Buck Blacktop, Inc. v. Gary Contracting and Trucking Company, LLC 929 N.W.2d 12 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co. , 237 Minn. 28 , the supreme court applied section 544.32 to a claim of excusable neglect.
Larry Lake, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
237 Minn. 28, 30, -56 (Minn. 1952), review denied (Minn. Mar.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: N. J. G. and J. H., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 30, (applying Minn. R. Civ.
S. Robideau Construction, Inc. v. John E. Hiber, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
S. Robideau Construction, Inc. v. John E. Hiber, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
P. 60.02, Minnesota courts apply the four-factor test that the supreme court set forth in Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 30, –56 (1952), and reaffirmed in Finden v. Klaas, 268 Minn. 268, 271
Curtis Trude, (A15-0378), (A15-1863, A15-1864), Glenwood State Bank, counterclaimant, and third party v. Peterson Earth Movers, Inc., Third … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Curtis Trude, (A15-0378), (A15-1863, A15-1864), Glenwood State Bank, counterclaimant, and third party v. Peterson Earth Movers, Inc., Third … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See Finden v. Klaas, 268 Minn. 268, 271, Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 30
Unifund CCR, LLC, as assignee of Pilot Receivables Management, LLC v. Jeffrey A. Carney Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Unifund CCR, LLC, as assignee of Pilot Receivables Management, LLC v. Jeffrey A. Carney Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See, Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 30
Anita Haider, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Evi E. Kari v. Kenneth Kari Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Anita Haider, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Evi E. Kari v. Kenneth Kari Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(citing Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 30, ).
Rebecca J. Adams, John Crudele v. James Koch, Steve Hyland, Erik Ostigaard, Greg Bohnsack Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Rebecca J. Adams, John Crudele v. James Koch, Steve Hyland, Erik Ostigaard, Greg Bohnsack Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 30, -56 (1952).
Sharon Anne Johnson v. Paul Jonathan Koski Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Sharon Anne Johnson v. Paul Jonathan Koski Minn. Ct. App. 2015
2 Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 30
Jerry Wayne Cole v. Alexander Allen Wutzke 868 N.W.2d 925 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jerry Wayne Cole v. Alexander Allen Wutzke 868 N.W.2d 925 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Northland Temps., d at 402; see also Finden v. Klaas, 268 Minn. 268, 271–73, –51 (1964) (reversing district court’s denial of relief when all factors met); Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 30, d 454, 455–56 (1952) (same).2 Cole asserts that the district court failed to apply the rule-60.02 factors and that we therefore should review the district court’s decision de novo.
Ferdinand Leo Gams, Jr. v. Steven Ronald Houghton 869 N.W.2d 60 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ride Auto Company, judgment creditor v. Luis Silva Ibanez, Judgment Debtor, Johnny's LLC, garnishees Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ride Auto Company, judgment creditor v. Luis Silva Ibanez, Judgment Debtor, Johnny's LLC, garnishees Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Advisors, Inc., see also Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 30
Insulation Distributors, Inc. v. William J. Bourque, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Insulation Distributors, Inc. v. William J. Bourque, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The district court analyzed the issue under the four-factor test set forth in Hinz v. Northland 2 Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 30 found that all four factors were met, and granted the motion.
Langston v. Wilson McShane Corp. 776 N.W.2d 684 Minn. 2009
Langston v. Wilson McShane Corp. 776 N.W.2d 684 Minn. 2009
The respondents thereafter moved to vacate the default judgment, arguing both that the state court did not have subject matter jurisdiction over Langston’s claim and that the default judgment should be vacated under the four-factor test announced in Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 28, 30
Palladium Holdings, LLC v. Zuni Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-OA1 775 N.W.2d 168 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Palladium Holdings, LLC v. Zuni Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-OA1 775 N.W.2d 168 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
(citing Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 30 , which states factors quoted in Finden).
Langston v. Wilson McShane Corp. 758 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Langston v. Wilson McShane Corp. 758 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
P. 60.02 by applying a four-factor test established in Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28
Northland Temporaries, Inc. v. Turpin 744 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Northland Temporaries, Inc. v. Turpin 744 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
What is the remedy if the district court relies on an error of law or fact when applying the factors in Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28 , ?
Enright v. Lehmann 724 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Enright v. Lehmann 724 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 30 , -56 (1952).
Meyer v. Best Western Seville Plaza Hotel 562 N.W.2d 690 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Meyer v. Best Western Seville Plaza Hotel 562 N.W.2d 690 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice *695 Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 30 , -56 (1952).
DeGrande v. Demby 529 N.W.2d 340 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
DeGrande v. Demby 529 N.W.2d 340 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
No. 1, (citing Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 30 , ).
Kemmerer v. State Farm Insurance Companies 513 N.W.2d 838 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Kemmerer v. State Farm Insurance Companies 513 N.W.2d 838 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 30 , -56 (1952).
Peterson v. Eishen 512 N.W.2d 338 Minn. 1994
Peterson v. Eishen 512 N.W.2d 338 Minn. 1994
Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 31
Kubiszewski v. St. John 498 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Kubiszewski v. St. John 498 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Sales, citing Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 30
Foerster v. Folland 498 N.W.2d 459 Minn. 1993
Foerster v. Folland 498 N.W.2d 459 Minn. 1993
We identified the four factors to be considered by the trial court upon motion to vacate a default judgment in Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 30 , -56 (1952).