DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Alsdorf v. Svoboda, 57 N.W.2d 824.

31 citing documents.

  • Voicestream Minneapolis, Inc. v. RPC Properties, Inc. 743 N.W.2d 267 Minn. 2008
  • Distinguished Voicestream Minneapolis, Inc. v. RPC Properties, Inc. 743 N.W.2d 267 Minn. 2008
    Sanvik cites to Alsdorf v. Svoboda, 239 Minn. 1 , as does T-Mobile in its brief.
  • Olesen v. Manty 438 N.W.2d 404 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
  • Olesen v. Manty 438 N.W.2d 404 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
    See, e.g., Alsdorf v. Svoboda, 239 Minn. 1
  • In Re Estate of Trobaugh 380 N.W.2d 152 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • In Re Estate of Trobaugh 380 N.W.2d 152 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    See Husbyn v. Lunde, 283 Minn. 74 , (fourteen years of service without compensation other than room and board); Tjanetopoulos v. Margares, 256 Minn. 176 , (moved to United States from Greece, learned English, worked for decedent); Alsdorf v. Svoboda, 239 Minn. 1 , (lived most of life with decedent, cared for decedent in sickness and in health); Ehmke v. Hill, 236 Minn. 60 , (years of uncompensated work, improvements to property, gave up financial opportunities); Matheson v. Gullickson, 222 Minn.
  • Clark v. Clark 288 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1979
  • Clark v. Clark 288 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1979
    See, e. g., Husbyn v. Lunde, 283 Minn. 74 , Alsdorf v. Svoboda, 239 Minn. 1
  • Associated Lithographers v. Stay Wood Products, Inc. 279 N.W.2d 787 Minn. 1979
  • Associated Lithographers v. Stay Wood Products, Inc. 279 N.W.2d 787 Minn. 1979
    for amended findings, appellants asked the court to find that Olejnicak told Meyer, and that Meyer knew, that Slade “had to be contacted before accepting a purchase order that would be valid for either Stay Wood Products, Inc. or Slade.” The court denied the motion to amend the findings, and the denial “is equivalent to making findings negativing the facts asked to be found.” Alsdorf v. Svoboda, 239 Minn. 1, 11
  • Husbyn v. Lunde 166 N.W.2d 333 Minn. 1969
  • Husbyn v. Lunde 166 N.W.2d 333 Minn. 1969
    Alsdorf v. Svoboda, 239 Minn. 1 , 57 *77 N. W. (2d) 824; In re Estate of LeBorius, 224 Minn. 203 , 28 N. W. (2d) 157 .
  • Malmin v. Grabner 163 N.W.2d 39 Minn. 1968
  • Malmin v. Grabner 163 N.W.2d 39 Minn. 1968
    Seitz v. Sitze, 215 Minn. 452 , 10 N. W. (2d) 426 ; Alsdorf v. Svoboda, 239 Minn. 1 , 57 N. W. (2d) 824 ; Delyea v. Turner, 264 Minn. 169 , 118 N. W. (2d) 436 .
  • Sanvik v. Maher 158 N.W.2d 206 Minn. 1968
  • Sanvik v. Maher 158 N.W.2d 206 Minn. 1968
    Alsdorf v. Svoboda, 239 Minn. 1 , 57 N. W. (2d) 824 .
  • Delyea v. Turner 118 N.W.2d 436 Minn. 1962
  • Delyea v. Turner 118 N.W.2d 436 Minn. 1962
    Gifford v. Vore, 245 Minn. 432 , 72 N. W. (2d) 625 ; In re Estate of Dahl, 249 Minn. 156 , 81 N. W. (2d) 701 ; Hynan v. First Trust Co. 258 Minn. 118 , 103 N. W. (2d) 209 ; Alsdorf v. Svoboda, 239 Minn. 1 , 57 N. W. (2d) 824 .
  • Flynn v. Beisel 102 N.W.2d 284 Minn. 1960
  • Chopp v. Chopp 102 N.W.2d 318 Minn. 1960
  • Chopp v. Chopp 102 N.W.2d 318 Minn. 1960
    1 Alsdorf v. Svoboda, 239 Minn. 1 , 57 N. W. (2d) 824 ; Martens v. Martens, 211 Minn. 369 , 1 N. W. (2d) 356 ; Sheffield v. Clifford, 186 Minn. 300 , 243 N.W.
  • Flynn v. Beisel 102 N.W.2d 284 Minn. 1960
    (3 ed.) §§ 410, 411; State, by Peterson, v. Bentley, 245 Minn. 334 , 71 N. W. (2d) 780 ; Alsdorf v. Svoboda, 239 Minn. 1 , 57 N. W. (2d) 824 ; Marquardt v. Stark, 239 Minn. 107 , 58 N. W. (2d) 273 .
  • G. C. Kohlmier, Inc. v. Albin 101 N.W.2d 909 Minn. 1960
  • G. C. Kohlmier, Inc. v. Albin 101 N.W.2d 909 Minn. 1960
    Co. Ltd. 252 Minn. 118 , 89 N. W. (2d) 726 ; State v. Adams, 251 Minn. 521 , 89 N. W. (2d) 661 ; State v. Bentley, 245 Minn. 334 , 71 N. W. (2d) 780 ; Alsdorf v. Svoboda, 239 Minn. 1 , 57 N. W. (2d) 824 ; Marquardt v. Stark, 239 Minn. 107 , 58 N. W. (2d) 273 ; 1 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Tjanetopoulos v. Margares 98 N.W.2d 97 Minn. 1959
  • Tjanetopoulos v. Margares 98 N.W.2d 97 Minn. 1959
    They are set forth in Ehmke v. Hill, 236 Minn. 60, 68 , 51 N. W. (2d) 811, 817 , as follows: “* * * an oral contract for the transfer of an interest in land, whether by conveyance or by will, may be removed from the purview of the statute of frauds [M. S. A. 513.04] on either the unequivocal reference theory or on the fraud theory of part performance.” In Alsdorf v. Svoboda, 239 Minn. 1, 9 , 57 N. W. (2d) 824, 830 , we said: * * No inequities exist as a basis for refusing specific perform- *180
  • State v. Bentley 71 N.W.2d 780 Minn. 1955
  • State v. Bentley 71 N.W.2d 780 Minn. 1955
    In re Psychopathic Personality of Dittrich, 215 Minn. 234 , 9 N. W. (2d) 510 ; Alsdorf v. Svoboda, 239 Minn. 1 , 57 N. W. (2d) 824 ; Marquardt v. Stark, 239 Minn. 107 , 58 N. W. (2d) 273 .
  • Nelson v. Dorr 58 N.W.2d 876 Minn. 1953
  • Nelson v. Dorr 58 N.W.2d 876 Minn. 1953
    Alsdorf v. Svoboda, 239 Minn. 1 , 57 N. W. (2d) 824 ; Martens v. Martens, 211 Minn. 369 , 1 N. W. (2d) 356 ; Sheffield v. Clifford, 186 Minn. 300 , ; Buro v. Morse, 183 Minn. 518 , ; In re Estate of Malchow, 143 Minn. 53 , .
  • Kray v. Muggli 79 N.W. 964 Minn. 1899
    But all of these plaintiffs might have joined in one action (see Grant v. Schmidt, 22 *239 Minn. 1 , and 14 Enc.