Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Swanson v. LaFontaine, 57 N.W.2d 262.
- State v. Gebremariam 590 N.W.2d 781 Minn. 1999
-
State v. Gebremariam
590 N.W.2d 781
Minn. 1999
See ge?ierally Swanson v. La Fontaine, 238 Minn. 460, 469 , *784 State v. Hutchison, 121 Minn. 405, 409 , 141 N.W.
- Arrowhead Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. LTV Steel Mining Co. 568 N.W.2d 875 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
-
Arrowhead Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. LTV Steel Mining Co.
568 N.W.2d 875
Minn. Ct. App. 1997
The district court rejected this defense, concluding that LTV had cited no evidence that the July rainfall was “unexpected and unforeseeable.” See Vanden Broucke v. Lyon County, 301 Minn. 399, 405 , (stating that to be an act of God, event must be both unexpect *880 ed and unforeseeable) (citing Swanson v. La Fontaine, 238 Minn. 460 , ).
- Willmar Poultry Co. v. Carus Chemical Co. 378 N.W.2d 830 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
Willmar Poultry Co. v. Carus Chemical Co.
378 N.W.2d 830
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Swanson v. LaFontaine, 238 Minn. 460, 469
- Vanden Broucke v. Lyon County 222 N.W.2d 792 Minn. 1974
-
Vanden Broucke v. Lyon County
222 N.W.2d 792
Minn. 1974
Swanson v. LaFontaine, 238 Minn. 460
- Cormican v. Parsons 163 N.W.2d 41 Minn. 1968
-
Cormican v. Parsons
163 N.W.2d 41
Minn. 1968
In Swanson v. LaFontaine, 238 Minn. 460 , 57 N. W. (2d) 262 , a pedestrian was walking along a sidewalk when he was placed in peril by an automobile hood blown from the defendant’s automobile by high winds.
- Waldstein v. Amann 208 N.W.2d 215 Minn. 1961
-
Waldstein v. Amann
208 N.W.2d 215
Minn. 1961
Accordingly we have held that it is preferable to ‘charge the jury in an orderly, systematic, and consecutive manner in a general charge upon the whole law of the case’ after considering all the requested instructions.” Swanson v. LaFontaine, 238 Minn. 460, 469 , 57 N. W. (2d) 262, 268 ; Markle v. Haase, 245 Minn. 520 , 73 N. W. (2d) 362 ; and see, Bylund v. Carroll, 203 Minn. 484 , .
- Phillips v. Great Northern Railway Co. 100 N.W.2d 765 Minn. 1960
-
Phillips v. Great Northern Railway Co.
100 N.W.2d 765
Minn. 1960
See, also, Swanson v. LaFontaine, 238 Minn. 460 , 57 N. W. (2d) 262 ; Bylund v. Carroll, 203 Minn. 484 , ; Markle v. Haase, 245 Minn. 520 , 73 N. W. (2d) 362 ; Floen v. Sund, 255 Minn. 211 , 96 N. W. (2d) 563 ; Chicago & N. W. Ry.
- Floen v. Sund 96 N.W.2d 563 Minn. 1959
-
Floen v. Sund
96 N.W.2d 563
Minn. 1959
6 Swanson v. LaFontaine, 238 Minn. 460, 469 , 57 N. W. (2d) 262, 268 ; see, Markle v. Haase, 245 Minn. 520 , 73 N. W. (2d) 362 ; and see, Bylund v. Carroll, 203 Minn. 484 , .
- Carmody v. Aho 86 N.W.2d 692 Minn. 1957
- Lund v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 86 N.W.2d 78 Minn. 1957
-
Lund v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.
86 N.W.2d 78
Minn. 1957
Swanson v. LaFontaine, 238 Minn. 460 , 57 N. W. (2d) 262 ; Ferguson v. Kehoe, 245 Minn. 46 , 71 N. W. (2d) 168 .
- State v. Axilrod 79 N.W.2d 677 Minn. 1956
-
State v. Axilrod
79 N.W.2d 677
Minn. 1956
See, Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200, 208 , 62 N. W. (2d) 793, 798 ; Swanson v. LaFontaine, 238 Minn. 460, 469 , 57 N. W. (2d) 262, 268 .
- Markle v. Haase 73 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 1955
-
Markle v. Haase
73 N.W.2d 362
Minn. 1955
Devall v. Standard Oil Co. 239 Minn. 87 , 57 N. W. (2d) 835 ; Swanson v. LaFontaine, 238 Minn. 460 , 57 N. W. (2d) 262 ; 6 Dunnell, Dig.
- Cameron v. Evans 62 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 1954
-
Cameron v. Evans
62 N.W.2d 793
Minn. 1954
14 Swanson v. LaFontaine, 238 Minn. 460 , 57 N. W. (2d) 262 ; 6 Dunnell, Dig.
- Albert Lea Ice & Fuel Co. v. United States Fire Insurance 58 N.W.2d 614 Minn. 1953
-
Albert Lea Ice & Fuel Co. v. United States Fire Insurance
58 N.W.2d 614
Minn. 1953
See, Swanson v. LaFontaine, 238 Minn. 460 , 57 N. W. (2d) 262 ; Woyak v. Konieske, 237 Minn. 213 , 54 N. W. (2d) 649 .
- Devall v. Standard Oil Co. 57 N.W.2d 835 Minn. 1953