Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Nelson v. Twin City Motor Bus Co., 58 N.W.2d 561.

56 citing documents.

  • Dickhoff ex rel. Dickhoff v. Green 836 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 2013
  • Rowe v. Munye 702 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 2005
  • Rowe v. Munye 702 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 2005
    See, e.g., Nelson v. Twin City Motor Bus Co., 239 Minn. 276, 280
  • Rowe v. Munye 674 N.W.2d 761 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • Rowe v. Munye 674 N.W.2d 761 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
    In evaluating whether the first two sentences of CIVJIG 91.40 are consistent with Minnesota law, the court used as its touchstone its holdings in Nelson v. Twin City Motor Bus Co., 239 Minn. 276 , and Schore v. Mueller, 290 Minn. 186
  • Heine v. Simon 674 N.W.2d 411 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • Heine v. Simon 674 N.W.2d 411 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
    Nelson v. Twin City Motor Bus Co., 239 Minn. 276, 280 , see also Schore v. Mueller, 290 Minn. 186, 189
  • Morlock v. St. Paul Guardian Insurance Co. 650 N.W.2d 154 Minn. 2002
  • Morlock v. St. Paul Guardian Insurance Co. 650 N.W.2d 154 Minn. 2002
    239 Minn. 276, 280 , see also Schore v. Mueller, 290 Minn. 186, 190 , -02 (1971) (following Nelson).
  • Pususta v. State Farm Insurance Companies 632 N.W.2d 549 Minn. 2001
  • Pususta v. State Farm Insurance Companies 632 N.W.2d 549 Minn. 2001
    Co., , 275 n. 2 (Minn.1995) (stating compensatory damages are the “natural, necessary and usual result of the * * * occurrence in question.”); (stating aggravation damages ensure that defendant pays only for the harm he causes, not the harm plaintiff already had); Nelson v. Twin City Motor Bus Co., 239 Minn. 276, 280
  • Blatz v. Allina Health System 622 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • Blatz v. Allina Health System 622 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
    pre-existing condition, the measure of damages is the pain and disability over and above pre-accident pain and disability); Schore v. Mueller, 290 Minn. 186, 189-90 , (concluding that plaintiff entitled to recover proved damages for aggravation of preexisting injury, limited, however, to those damages caused by defendant’s negligence); Nelson v. Twin City Motor Bus Co., 239 Minn. 276, 280 , (concluding that plaintiff was entitled to recover damages from aggravation of pre-existing condition caus
  • Ellingson v. Burlington Northern Railroad 412 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • Ellingson v. Burlington Northern Railroad 412 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    Nelson v. Twin City Motor Bus Co., 239 Minn. 276, 282
  • Sather v. Snedigar 372 N.W.2d 836 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Sather v. Snedigar 372 N.W.2d 836 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    See Nelson v. Twin City Motor Bus Co., 239 Minn. 276, 282-83
  • Anderson Aviation Sales Company, Inc. v. Perez 508 P.2d 87 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
  • Schore v. Mueller 186 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 1971
  • Schore v. Mueller 186 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 1971
    Nelson v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 239 Minn. 276 , 58 N. W. (2d) 561 .
  • Baldwin v. CHICAGO AND NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY CO. 171 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 1969
  • Baldwin v. CHICAGO AND NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY CO. 171 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 1969
    Co. 241 Minn. 485 , 63 N. W. (2d) 560 ; Trudeau v. Sina Contracting Co. 241 Minn. 79 , 62 N. W. (2d) 492 ; Nelson v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 239 Minn. 276 , 58 N. W. (2d) 561 ; Wilson v. Home Gas Co. 267 Minn. 162 , 125 N. W. (2d) 725 .
  • Marlowe v. Gunderson 109 N.W.2d 323 Minn. 1961
  • Marlowe v. Gunderson 109 N.W.2d 323 Minn. 1961
    See, Nelson v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 239 Minn. 276 , 58 N. W. (2d) 561 .
  • Zugsmith v. Mullins 344 P.2d 739 Ariz. 1959
  • Wilson v. Sorge 97 N.W.2d 477 Minn. 1959
  • Wilson v. Sorge 97 N.W.2d 477 Minn. 1959
    Nelson v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 239 Minn. 276 , 58 N. W. (2d) 561 ; Harris v. Breezy Point Lodge, Inc. 238 Minn. 322 , 56 N. W. (2d) 655 .
  • Floen v. Sund 96 N.W.2d 563 Minn. 1959
  • Floen v. Sund 96 N.W.2d 563 Minn. 1959
    11 Nelson v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 239 Minn. 276 , 58 N. W. (2d) 561 ; Harris v. Breezy Point Lodge, Inc. 238 Minn. 322 , 56 N. W. (2d) 655 .
  • Bush v. Havir 91 N.W.2d 784 Minn. 1958
  • Bush v. Havir 91 N.W.2d 784 Minn. 1958
    1 See, Nelson v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 239 Minn. 276 , 58 N. W. (2d) 561 ; Harris v. Breezy Point Lodge, Inc. 238 Minn. 322 , 56 N. W. (2d) 655 ; 14 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Swanson v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 90 N.W.2d 514 Minn. 1958
  • Swanson v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 90 N.W.2d 514 Minn. 1958
    10 Nelson v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 239 Minn. 276 , 58 N. W. (2d) 561 .
  • Coble v. Lacey 90 N.W.2d 314 Minn. 1958
  • Coble v. Lacey 90 N.W.2d 314 Minn. 1958
    Co. 241 Minn. 485 , 63 N. W. (2d) 560 ; Smith v. Otto Hendrickson Post 212, American Legion, 241 Minn. 46 , 62 N. W. (2d) 354 ; Hess v. Koskovitch, 241 Minn. 174 , 62 N. W. (2d) 806 ; Nelson v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 239 Minn. 276 , 58 N. W. (2d) 561 ; MacIllravie v. St.
  • Olson v. Penkert 90 N.W.2d 193 Minn. 1958
  • Olson v. Penkert 90 N.W.2d 193 Minn. 1958
    Caballero v. Litchfield Wood-Working Co. Inc. 246 Minn. 124 , 74 N. W. (2d) 404 ; Smith v. Otto Hendrickson Post 212, American Legion, 241 Minn. 46 , 62 N. W. (2d) 354 ; Hess v. Koskovitch, 241 Minn. 174 , 62 N. W. (2d) 806 ; Nelson v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 239 Minn. 276 , 58 N. W. (2d) 561 ; Marion v. Miller, 237 Minn. 306 , 55 N. W. (2d) 52 ; MacIllravie v. St.
  • Person v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. 89 N.W.2d 694 Minn. 1958
  • Fenton v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 89 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 1958
  • Fenton v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 89 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 1958
    10 See, Hammel v. Feigh, 143 Minn. 115 , ; Harris v. Breezy Point Lodge, Inc. 238 Minn. 322 , 56 N. W. (2d) 655 ; Nelson v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 239 Minn. 276 , 58 N. W. (2d) 561 ; Hardy v. Anderson, 241 Minn. 478 , 63 N. W. (2d) 814 ; 14 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Cox v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co. 84 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 1957
  • Cox v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co. 84 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 1957
    3 Nelson v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 239 Minn. 276 , 58 N. W. (2d) 561 .
  • Norby v. Klukow 81 N.W.2d 776 Minn. 1957
  • Norby v. Klukow 81 N.W.2d 776 Minn. 1957
    The court did give an instruction on this subject which instruction was approved as technically correct in a similar situation in Nelson v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 239 Minn. 276 , 58 N. W. (2d) 561 .
  • Lee v. Lee 80 N.W.2d 529 Minn. 1957
  • Lee v. Lee 80 N.W.2d 529 Minn. 1957
    Co. 247 Minn. 368 , 77 N. W. (2d) 433 ; Nelson v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 239 Minn. 276, 282 , 58 N. W. (2d) 561, 565 ; Hardy v. Anderson, 241 Minn. 478, 483 , 63 N. W. (2d) 814, 818 ; Smith v. Barry, 219 Minn. 182, 191 , 17 N. W. (2d) 324, 328 .
  • Fieve v. Emmeck 78 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 1956
  • Fieve v. Emmeck 78 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 1956
    7 See, also, Storey v. Weinberg, 226 Minn. 48 , 31 N. W. (2d) 912 ; Nelson v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 239 Minn. 276 , 58 N. W. (2d) 561 .
  • Patton v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 77 N.W.2d 433 Minn. 1956
  • Patton v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 77 N.W.2d 433 Minn. 1956
    Nelson v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 239 Minn. 276 , 58 N. W. (2d) 561 ; Harris v. Breezy Point Lodge, Inc. 238 Minn. 322 , 56 N. W. (2d) 655 .