DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Audette v. Lindahl, 42 N.W.2d 717.

28 citing documents.

  • Senogles v. Carlson 902 N.W.2d 38 Minn. 2017
  • Senogles v. Carlson 902 N.W.2d 38 Minn. 2017
    Audette v. Lindahl, 231 Minn. 239 , (stating that a child is required to exercise the “degree of care which would ordinarily be exercised by a child of that age, experience, and intelligence, under the same or similar circumstances”); see also Peterson v. Minn. Power & Light Co., 206 Minn. 268 , 288 N.W.
  • Tomfohr v. Mayo Foundation 450 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1990
  • Tomfohr v. Mayo Foundation 450 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1990
    320 , 66 L.Ed.2d 149 *124 (1980); Watts v. Erickson, 244 Minn. 264, 268-69 , Audette v. Lindahl, 231 Minn. 239, 242
  • Toetschinger v. Ihnot 250 N.W.2d 204 Minn. 1977
  • Toetschinger v. Ihnot 250 N.W.2d 204 Minn. 1977
    See, Rosvold v. Johnson, 284 Minn. 162 , Pelzer v. Lange, 254 Minn. 46 , Bruno v. Belmonte, 252 Minn. 497 , Watts v. Erickson, 244 Minn. 264 , Audette v. Lindahl, 231 Minn. 239 , Eckhardt v. Hanson, 196 Minn. 270 , , 107 A. L. R. 1 (1936).
  • Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc. 189 N.W.2d 499 Minn. 1971
  • Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc. 189 N.W.2d 499 Minn. 1971
    Audette v. Lindahl, 231 Minn. 239 , 42 N. W. (2d) 717 .
  • Van Asch v. Rutili 174 N.W.2d 101 Minn. 1970
  • Van Asch v. Rutili 174 N.W.2d 101 Minn. 1970
    The duty, however, always remains the same — reasonable care under the circumstances.” A similar contention was raised in Audette v. Lindahl, 231 Minn. 239 , 42 N. W. (2d) 717 , where we held it was reversible error to deny an instruction that, where children are known or may reasonably be expected to be in the vicinity, a degree of vigilance commensurate with the greater hazard created by their presence or probable presence is required.
  • Schmidt v. Beninga 173 N.W.2d 401 Minn. 1970
  • Schmidt v. Beninga 173 N.W.2d 401 Minn. 1970
    Sviggum v. Phillips, 217 Minn. 586 , 15 N. W. (2d) 109 ; Olson v. Evert, 224 Minn. 528 , 28 N. W.(2d) 753; Audette v. Lindahl, 231 Minn. 239 , 42 N. W. (2d) 717 .” The credibility of the evidence and every inference which may fairly be drawn therefrom must be viewed in a light most favorable to plaintiffs upon defendants’ motion for a directed verdict.
  • Rosvold v. Johnson 169 N.W.2d 598 Minn. 1969
  • Rosvold v. Johnson 169 N.W.2d 598 Minn. 1969
    onnection with the duty of Gary DeRoiser [driver of the death vehicle] I should also add this: Where a person knows or has reason to know that children are likely to be in the vicinity, the greater hazard created by their presence or probable presence is a circumstance to be considered.” It is well settled that a 5-year-old child may be found guilty of contributory negligence, Audette v. Lindahl, 231 Minn. 239 , 42 N. W. (2d) 717 ; but in Watts v. Erickson, 244 Minn. 264, 268 , 69 N. W. (2d) 626
  • Swedeen v. Swedeen 134 N.W.2d 871 Minn. 1965
  • Swedeen v. Swedeen 134 N.W.2d 871 Minn. 1965
    Sviggum v. Phillips, 217 Minn. 586 , 15 N. W. (2d) 109 ; Olson v. Evert, 224 Minn. 528 , 28 N. W. (2d) 753 ; Audette v. Lindahl, 231 Minn. 239 , 42 N. W. (2d) 717 .
  • Pelzer v. Lange 93 N.W.2d 666 Minn. 1958
  • Pelzer v. Lange 93 N.W.2d 666 Minn. 1958
    Eckhardt v. Hanson, 196 Minn. 270 , , 107 A. L. R. 1; Audette v. Lindahl, 231 Minn. 239 , 42 N. W. (2d) 717 ; Bruno v. Belmonte, 252 Minn. 497 , 90 N. W. (2d) 899 .
  • Loftus v. City of Austin 91 N.W.2d 77 Minn. 1958
  • Bruno Ex Rel. Bruno v. Belmonte 90 N.W.2d 899 Minn. 1958
  • Bruno Ex Rel. Bruno v. Belmonte 90 N.W.2d 899 Minn. 1958
    1 See, Eckhardt v. Hanson, 196 Minn. 270 , , 107 A. L. R. 1; Audette v. Lindahl, 231 Minn. 239 , 42 N. W. (2d) 717 .
  • Loftus v. City of Austin 91 N.W.2d 77 Minn. 1958
    Audette v. Lindahl, 231 Minn. 239 , 42 N. W. (2d) 717 , restates the rule relative to contributory negligence on the part of children, which rule has been followed in this state for years.
  • Shawley v. Husman 78 N.W.2d 60 Minn. 1956
  • Shawley v. Husman 78 N.W.2d 60 Minn. 1956
    See, e.g., Audette v. Lindahl, 231 Minn. 239 , 42 N. W. (2d) 717 ; Otterness v. Hathaway, 204 Minn. 88 , .
  • Watts Ex Rel. Watts v. Erickson 69 N.W.2d 626 Minn. 1955
  • Watts Ex Rel. Watts v. Erickson 69 N.W.2d 626 Minn. 1955
    Our most recent decision on the issue of the contributory negligence of a child is Audette v. Lindahl, 231 Minn. 239 , 42 N. W. (2d) 717 .
  • Lovel v. Squirt Bottling Co. of Waconia, Inc. 48 N.W.2d 525 Minn. 1951
  • Lovel v. Squirt Bottling Co. of Waconia, Inc. 48 N.W.2d 525 Minn. 1951
    See, Audette v. Lindahl, 231 Minn. 239 , 42 N. W. (2d) 717 ; McCarthy v. City of St.