Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Borstad v. Ulstad, 45 N.W.2d 828.
-
In re the Estate of: Irene B. Horton, Deceased.
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
at 51-52; see also Appeal of Borstad
- In Re Estate of Jenks 189 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 1971
- Carter v. First Trust Co. 189 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 1971
-
Carter v. First Trust Co.
189 N.W.2d 695
Minn. 1971
In re Estate of Rasmus *144 sen, 244 Minn. 215 , 69 N. W. (2d) 630 ; In re Estate of Liberopulos, 245 Minn. 553 , 73 N. W. (2d) 607 ; In re Estate of Healy, 243 Minn. 383 , 68 N. W. (2d) 401 ; In re Estate of Enyart, 180 Minn. 256 , ; Borstad v. Ulstad, 232 Minn. 365 , 45 N. W. (2d) 828 ; In re Estate of Forsythe, 221 Minn. 303 , 22 N. W. (2d) 19 , 167 A. L. R. 1; Annotation, 76 A. L. R. 373; 20 Dunnell, Dig.
-
In Re Estate of Jenks
189 N.W.2d 695
Minn. 1971
781 ; Borstad v. Ulstad, 232 Minn. 365 , ; In re Estate of Forsythe, 221 Minn. 303 , , 167 A.L.R.
- Gustafson v. Kilgore 168 N.W.2d 502 Minn. 1969
- In Re Estate of Peterson 168 N.W.2d 502 Minn. 1969
-
In Re Estate of Peterson
168 N.W.2d 502
Minn. 1969
In re Estate of Anthony, supra ; Borstad v. Ulstad, 232 Minn. 365 , .
-
Gustafson v. Kilgore
168 N.W.2d 502
Minn. 1969
In re Estate of Anthony, supra; Borstad v. Ulstad, 232 Minn. 365 , 45 N. W. (2d) 828 .
- In Re Estate of Anthony 265 Minn. 382 Minn. 1963
-
In Re Estate of Anthony
265 Minn. 382
Minn. 1963
(2d) 630, 635 ; Borstad v. Ulstad, 232 Minn. 365, 371 , 45 N.W.
- In Re Estate of Holden 261 Minn. 527 Minn. 1962
- Larsen v. Bjerke 113 N.W.2d 87 Minn. 1962
-
In Re Estate of Holden
261 Minn. 527
Minn. 1962
990 ; Borstad v. Ulstad, 232 Minn. 365 , 45 N.W.
-
Larsen v. Bjerke
113 N.W.2d 87
Minn. 1962
In re Estate of Forsythe, 221 Minn. 303 , 22 N. W. (2d) 19 , 167 *532 A. L. R. 1; In re Estate of Jernberg, 153 Minn. 458 , ; Borstad v. Ulstad, 232 Minn. 365 , 45 N. W. (2d) 828 ; In re Estate of Liberopulos, 245 Minn. 553 , 73 N. W. (2d) 607 .
- Leuba v. Bailey 88 N.W.2d 73 Minn. 1957
-
Leuba v. Bailey
88 N.W.2d 73
Minn. 1957
N. W. (2d) 277, 282 , we said that: “* * * The existence of undue influence is a question of fact, and the supreme court will not set aside the findings of the trial court as to undue influence unless they are manifestly and palpably contrary to the evidence as a whole, and this holds true even though this court might have determined otherwise if it had heard the case de novo.” Borstad v. Ulstad, 232 Minn. 365 , 45 N. W. (2d) 828 ; In re Estate of Rasmussen, 244 Minn. 215 , 69 N. W. (2d) 630 ; 2
- In Re Estate of Reay 249 Minn. 123 Minn. 1957
-
In Re Estate of Reay
249 Minn. 123
Minn. 1957
[3] Borstad v. Ulstad, 232 Minn. 365 , 45 N.W.
- Liberopulos v. Chopis 73 N.W.2d 607 Minn. 1955
-
Liberopulos v. Chopis
73 N.W.2d 607
Minn. 1955
In re Estate of Healy, 243 Minn. 383 , 68 N. W. (2d) 401 ; Borstad v. Ulstad, 232 Minn. 365 , 45 N. W. (2d) 828 ; In re Estate of Forsythe, 221 Minn. 303 , 22 N. W. (2d) 19 , 167 A. L. R. 1.
- Bystrom v. Palmer 57 N.W.2d 409 Minn. 1953
-
Followed
Bystrom v. Palmer
57 N.W.2d 409
Minn. 1953
Borstad v. Ulstad, 232 Minn. 365 , 45 N. W. (2d) 828 ; In re Estate of Olson, 227 Minn. 289 , 35 N. W. (2d) 439 ; 6 Dunnell, Dig.
- Sorlie v. Thomas 51 N.W.2d 592 Minn. 1952
-
Sorlie v. Thomas
51 N.W.2d 592
Minn. 1952
Borstad v. Ulstad, 232 Minn. 365, 372 , 45 N. W. (2d) 828, 832 .