Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Roske v. Ilykanyics, 45 N.W.2d 769.

42 citing documents.

Chad Monson, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See, (“Under the theory of quasi-contract, the right to recover is governed by principles of equity, but the remedy— the obligation upon which the right of recovery rests—is created and imposed by law to prevent unjust enrichment at the expense of another.”); R (holding that under the theory of quasi-contract, “[t]he right to recover is governed by principles of equity, but the remedy is governed by the law” (citation omitted)).
Rios v. Jennie-O Turkey Store, Inc. 793 N.W.2d 309 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Rios v. Jennie-O Turkey Store, Inc. 793 N.W.2d 309 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Cherne Contracting Corp. v. Marathon Petroleum Co., 578 F.3d 735, 740 (8th Cir.2009); see also Roske v. Ilykanyics, 232 Minn. 383, 393-94 , (assigning error in district court’s determination of terms of oral contract).
Marriage of Angell v. Angell 777 N.W.2d 32 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Marriage of Angell v. Angell 777 N.W.2d 32 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
See Roske v. Ilykanyics, 232 Minn. 383, 392 , see also Boos v. Reynolds, 84 F.Supp.
Olson v. Synergistic Technologies Business Systems, Inc. 628 N.W.2d 142 Minn. 2001
Olson v. Synergistic Technologies Business Systems, Inc. 628 N.W.2d 142 Minn. 2001
Id.; cf. Roske v. Ilykanyics, 232 Minn. 383, 389 , (holding that the nature of the plaintiffs action based on the theory of quasi-contract entitled him to a jury trial because the theory of quasi-contract “developed as a branch of the common law * * *” ).
ServiceMaster of St. Cloud v. GAB Business Services, Inc. 530 N.W.2d 558 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
ServiceMaster of St. Cloud v. GAB Business Services, Inc. 530 N.W.2d 558 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Roske v. Ilykanyics, 232 Minn. 383, 389
Conroy v. Book Automation, Inc. 398 N.W.2d 657 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Conroy v. Book Automation, Inc. 398 N.W.2d 657 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Roske v. Ilykanyics, 232 Minn. 383, 392
Klennert v. Dorholt 386 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Klennert v. Dorholt 386 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See Roske v. Ilykanyics, 232 Minn. 383, 392-93
Acton Construction Co. v. State 383 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Acton Construction Co. v. State 383 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Roske v. Ilykanyics, 232 Minn. 383, 389
In Re Estate of Vangen 370 N.W.2d 479 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Distinguished In Re Estate of Vangen 370 N.W.2d 479 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Respondent cites Roske v. Ilykanyics, 232 Minn. 383 , to support his claim.
Mjolsness v. Mjolsness 363 N.W.2d 839 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Mjolsness v. Mjolsness 363 N.W.2d 839 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In contrast, “[q]uasi contracts are not contracts at all in the legal sense * * *.” Roske v. Ilykanyics, 232 Minn. 383, 389
Sabasko v. Fletcher 359 N.W.2d 339 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Sabasko v. Fletcher 359 N.W.2d 339 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
See Roske v. Ilykanyics, 232 Minn. 383, 391-92
Mutual Creamery Insurance v. Thomas 191 N.W.2d 831 Minn. 1971
Mutual Creamery Insurance v. Thomas 191 N.W.2d 831 Minn. 1971
Roske v. Ilykanyics, 232 Minn. 383
Landgraf v. Ellsworth 126 N.W.2d 766 Minn. 1964
Landgraf v. Ellsworth 126 N.W.2d 766 Minn. 1964
8 Roske v. Ilykanyics, 232 Minn. 383 , 45 N. W. (2d) 769 .
Balafas v. Balafas 117 N.W.2d 20 Minn. 1962
Balafas v. Balafas 117 N.W.2d 20 Minn. 1962
Creamery Co. 248 Minn. 184 , 79 N. W. (2d) 142 ; Roske v. Ilykanyics, 232 Minn. 383 , 45 N. W. (2d) 769 .
Booth v. Spindler 110 N.W.2d 889 Minn. 1961
Booth v. Spindler 110 N.W.2d 889 Minn. 1961
If the price or any part thereof has already been paid, the seller shall be liable to repay so much thereof as has been paid, concurrently with the return of the goods, or immediately after an offer to return the goods in exchange for repayment of the price.” 3 Roske v. Ilykanyics, 232 Minn. 383, 392 , 45 N. W. (2d) 769, 775 ; Walker v. New Mexico & S. P. R. Co. 165 U. S. 593, 598 , 17 S. Ct. 421, 422 , 41 L. ed. 837, 842; State, by Lord, v. LaBarre, 255 Minn. 309, 314 , 96 N. W. (2d) 642, 6
McCarthy's St. Louis Park Cafe, Inc. v. Minneapolis Baseball & Athletic Ass'n 104 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1960
McCarthy's St. Louis Park Cafe, Inc. v. Minneapolis Baseball & Athletic Ass'n 104 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1960
See, Roske v. Ilykanyics, 232 Minn. 383 , 45 N. W. (2d) 769 ; In re Estate of Delva, 195 Minn. 192 , ; Thiem v. Eckert, 165 Minn. 379 , .
Lundstrom Construction Co. v. Dygert 94 N.W.2d 527 Minn. 1959
Lundstrom Construction Co. v. Dygert 94 N.W.2d 527 Minn. 1959
7 Roske v. Ilykanyics, 232 Minn. 383, 389 , 45 N. W. (2d) 769, 774 ; Dusenka v. Dusenka, 221 Minn. 234, 238 , 21 N. W. (2d) 528, 531 ; Fargo Foundry Co. v. Village of Callaway, 148 Minn. 273, 275 , ; Carr v. Anderson, 154 Minn. 162, 164 , , 26 A. L. R. 557, 558; Restatement, Contracts, § 5, comment a, and Minnesota Annotations
State v. Kuss 84 N.W.2d 290 Minn. 1957
Roberge v. Cambridge Cooperative Creamery Co. 79 N.W.2d 142 Minn. 1956
Roberge v. Cambridge Cooperative Creamery Co. 79 N.W.2d 142 Minn. 1956
The essential differences between contracts implied in fact and quasi-contracts, which sometimes are referred to as contracts implied in law and are based on the right to recover for unjust enrichment, are sufficiently discussed in McArdle v. Williams, 193 Minn. 433 , ; Dusenka v. Dusenka, 221 Minn. 234 , 21 N. W. (2d) 528 ; and Roske v. Ilykanyics, 232 Minn. 383 , 45 N. W. (2d) 769 .
Wormsbecker v. Donovan Construction Co. 76 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 1956
Wormsbecker v. Donovan Construction Co. 76 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 1956
11 The functions of a special verdict, as distinguished from interrogatories submitted in connection with a general verdict, are discussed in Roske v. Ilykanyics, 232 Minn. 383 , 45 N. W. (2d) 769 .
Hallada v. Great Northern Railway 69 N.W.2d 673 Minn. 1955
Hallada v. Great Northern Railway 69 N.W.2d 673 Minn. 1955
22 Roske v. Ilykanyics, 232 Minn. 383 , 45 N. W. (2d) 769 .
Tompkins v. Sandeen 67 N.W.2d 405 Minn. 1954
Tompkins v. Sandeen 67 N.W.2d 405 Minn. 1954
10 Roske v. Ilykanyics, 232 Minn. 383 , 45 N. W. (2d) 769 ; Lepak v. Lepak, 195 Minn. 24 , ; Schultz v. Thompson, 156 Minn. 357 , ; Shepherd v. Halsall, 288 Ky.