DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Swanson v. Swanson, 46 N.W.2d 878.

30 citing documents.

  • Marriage of Bury v. Bury 416 N.W.2d 133 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • Marriage of Bury v. Bury 416 N.W.2d 133 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    for rev. denied (Minn. July 11, 1985) (citing Swanson v. Swanson, 233 Minn. 354, 362 , ).
  • Marriage of Quade v. Quade 367 N.W.2d 87 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Marriage of Quade v. Quade 367 N.W.2d 87 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    Swanson v. Swanson, 233 Minn. 354, 362
  • Peterson v. Peterson 242 N.W.2d 103 Minn. 1976
  • Peterson v. Peterson 242 N.W.2d 103 Minn. 1976
    8 In Bollenbach v. Bollenbach, 285 Minn. 418, 434 , we stated: “* * * [T]he assessment of fault in the ordinary divorce action is most difficult and * * * the dissolution of a marriage is the result frequently of a series of circumstances so complicated as to defy accurate fault assessment.” 9 As we stated in Swanson v. Swanson, 233 Minn. 354, 360 , : “* * * It does not seem likely that marital harmony will be promoted if a wife may drive her husband from her without prejudice to her claim for a
  • Wos v. Wos 191 N.W.2d 829 Minn. 1971
  • Wos v. Wos 191 N.W.2d 829 Minn. 1971
    Hellman v. Hellman, 250 Minn. 422 , Kucera v. Kucera, 275 Minn. 252 , Swanson v. Swanson, 233 Minn. 354
  • Vandewege v. Vandewege 170 N.W.2d 228 Minn. 1969
  • Vandewege v. Vandewege 170 N.W.2d 228 Minn. 1969
    In Swanson v. Swanson, 233 Minn. 354 , 46 N. W. (2d) 878 , the wife, who was denied alimony except for an award of $4,000, had a monthly income from employment adequate to support her, and the husband had substantial debts.
  • Johnston v. Johnston 158 N.W.2d 249 Minn. 1968
  • Johnston v. Johnston 158 N.W.2d 249 Minn. 1968
    Swanson v. Swanson, 233 Minn. 354 , 46 N. W. (2d) 878 .
  • Borchert v. Borchert 154 N.W.2d 902 Minn. 1967
  • Borchert v. Borchert 154 N.W.2d 902 Minn. 1967
    The later cases *21 respecting this subject are collected in Swanson v. Swanson, 233 Minn. 354 , 46 N. W. (2d) 878 , 1 and Baskerville v. Baskerville, 246 Minn. 496 , 75 N. W. (2d) 762 .
  • Kucera v. Kucera 146 N.W.2d 181 Minn. 1966
  • Kucera v. Kucera 146 N.W.2d 181 Minn. 1966
    See, Swanson v. Swanson, 233 Minn. 354 , 46 N. W. (2d) 878 .
  • Kelley v. Kelley 112 N.W.2d 798 Minn. 1962
  • Kelley v. Kelley 112 N.W.2d 798 Minn. 1962
    Lamberton v. Lamberton, 229 Minn. 29 , 38 N. W. (2d) 72 ; Louden v. Louden, 221 Minn. 338 , 22 N. W. (2d) 164 ; Swanson v. Swanson, 233 Minn. 354 , 46 N. W. (2d) 878 ; Ruprecht v. Ruprecht, 255 Minn. 80 , 96 N. W. (2d) 14 .
  • Cloutier v. Cloutier 112 N.W.2d 347 Minn. 1961
  • Distinguished Cloutier v. Cloutier 112 N.W.2d 347 Minn. 1961
    thereon to secure payment of alimony or support money, and all the facts and circumstances of the case.” *330 Plaintiff cites Baskerville v. Baskerville, 246 Minn. 496, 508 , 75 N. W. (2d) 762, 770 , in support of the proposition that: “* * * the delinquency of the parties is a material element in fixing the amount of alimony and the division of property.” Plaintiff also cites Swanson v. Swanson, 233 Minn. 354 , 46 N. W. (2d) 878 , in support of this rule.
  • Ruprecht v. Ruprecht 96 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 1959
  • Ruprecht v. Ruprecht 96 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 1959
    Eck v. Eck, 252 Minn. 290 , 90 N. W. (2d) 211 ; Johnson v. Johnson, 250 Minn. 282 , 84 N. W. (2d) 249 ; Hellman v. Hellman, 250 Minn. *91 422, 84 N. W. (2d) 367 ; Baskerville v. Baskerville, 246 Minn. 496 , 75 N. W. (2d) 762 ; Swanson v. Swanson, 233 Minn. 354 , 46 N. W. (2d) 878 ; Krusemark v. Krusemark, 232 Minn. 416 , 46 N. W. (2d) 647 ; Baker v. Baker, 224 Minn. 117 , 28 N. W. (2d) 164 ; 6 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Eck v. Eck 90 N.W.2d 211 Minn. 1958
  • Eck v. Eck 90 N.W.2d 211 Minn. 1958
    See, Swanson v. Swanson, 233 Minn. 354 , 46 N. W. (2d) 878 .
  • Johnson v. Johnson 84 N.W.2d 249 Minn. 1957
  • Johnson v. Johnson 84 N.W.2d 249 Minn. 1957
    1 Swanson v. Swanson, 233 Minn. 354 , 46 N. W. (2d) 878 ; Louden v. Louden, 221 Minn. 338 , 22 N. W. (2d) 164 ; Potter v. Potter, 224 Minn. 29 , 27 N. W. (2d) 784 .
  • Baskerville v. Baskerville 75 N.W.2d 762 Minn. 1956
  • Baskerville v. Baskerville 75 N.W.2d 762 Minn. 1956
    20 In Swanson v. Swanson, 233 Minn. 354, 359 , 46 N. W. (2d) 878, 882 , we said: “* * * so far as we can determine no court in this state has held that the conduct of the wife should not be considered as a factor bearing on the amount of the award to which she may be entitled upon a divorce.
  • Kate v. Kate 48 N.W.2d 551 Minn. 1951
  • Kate v. Kate 48 N.W.2d 551 Minn. 1951
    Compare awards made in Potter v. Potter, 224 Minn. 29 , 27 N. W. (2d) 784 ; Baker v. Baker, 224 Minn. 117 , 28 N. W. (2d) 164 ; Hempel v. Hempel, 225 Minn. 287 , 30 N. W. (2d) 594 ; and Swanson v. Swanson, 233 Minn. 354 , 46 N. W. (2d) 878 .