Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Todeva v. Oliver Iron Mining Co., 45 N.W.2d 782.
- Falls v. Coca Cola Enterprises, Inc. 726 N.W.2d 96 Minn. 2007
-
Falls v. Coca Cola Enterprises, Inc.
726 N.W.2d 96
Minn. 2007
We have said that: “Strictly speaking, the rights and liabilities created by the Workers’ Compensation Act are imposed on the employment relationship pursuant to the police power, independently of any actual or implied contract.” Joyce v. Lewis Bolt & Nut Co., (citing Todeva v. Oliver Iron Mining Co., 232 Minn. 422, 428 , ).
- Kline v. Berg Drywall, Inc. 685 N.W.2d 12 Minn. 2004
-
Kline v. Berg Drywall, Inc.
685 N.W.2d 12
Minn. 2004
“Strictly speaking, the rights and liabilities created by the Workers’ Compensation Act are imposed on the employment relationship pursuant to the police power, independently of any actual or implied contract.” Joyce v. Lewis Bolt & Nut Co., (citing Todeva v. Oliver Iron Mining Co., 232 Minn. 422, 428 , ).
- Sazama Excavating, Inc. v. Wausau Insurance Companies 521 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
-
Sazama Excavating, Inc. v. Wausau Insurance Companies
521 N.W.2d 379
Minn. Ct. App. 1994
& A.M., 226 Minn. 141, 144 , (workers’ compensation act is sui generis, and concepts belonging to fundamentally different fields should not be applied to it); see also Todeva v. Oliver Iron Mining, 232 Minn. 422, 428 , (rights and liabilities under Workers’ Compensation Act are imposed on employment relationship pursuant to state’s police power, not private contract).
- Joyce v. Lewis Bolt & Nut Co. 412 N.W.2d 304 Minn. 1987
-
Joyce v. Lewis Bolt & Nut Co.
412 N.W.2d 304
Minn. 1987
Todeva v. Oliver Iron Mining Co., 232 Minn. 422, 428
- Sandal v. Tallman Oil Co. 281 N.W.2d 507 Minn. 1979
-
Sandal v. Tallman Oil Co.
281 N.W.2d 507
Minn. 1979
In Todeva v. Oliver Mining Co. 232 Minn. 422 , we determined the nature and scope of a nonresident alien’s right to dependent’s benefits.
- Knoble v. Storer Realty Co. 255 N.W.2d 388 Minn. 1977
-
Knoble v. Storer Realty Co.
255 N.W.2d 388
Minn. 1977
See, Todeva v. Oliver Iron Mining Co., 232 Minn. 422, 429
- Hagberg v. Colonial & Pacific Frigidways, Inc. 157 N.W.2d 33 Minn. 1968
-
Hagberg v. Colonial & Pacific Frigidways, Inc.
157 N.W.2d 33
Minn. 1968
Co. 232 Minn. 422 , 45 N. W. (2d) 782 .
- Raidt v. United States 130 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1964
-
Raidt v. United States
130 N.W.2d 121
Minn. 1964
Co. 232 Minn. 422 , 45 N. W. (2d) 782 , and the principles set forth therein were not modified or altered by the subsequent decision in In re Trusteeship under Will of Schmidt, 256 Minn. 64 , 97 N. W. (2d) 441 , as contended by appellants.
- In Re Trusteeship Under Will of Schmidt 256 Minn. 64 Minn. 1959
- First National Bank v. Kirschmann 97 N.W.2d 441 Minn. 1959
-
In Re Trusteeship Under Will of Schmidt
256 Minn. 64
Minn. 1959
Co. 232 Minn. 422 , 45 N.W.
-
First National Bank v. Kirschmann
97 N.W.2d 441
Minn. 1959
Co. 232 Minn. 422 , 45 N. W. (2d) 782 , in support of his contention that the fact that an interest may be distributable after the end of the war is no bar to payment under the vesting order.
- Reichert v. Victory Granite Co. 82 N.W.2d 497 Minn. 1957
-
Reichert v. Victory Granite Co.
82 N.W.2d 497
Minn. 1957
Co. 232 Minn. 422 , 45 N. W. (2d) 782 .
- Carroll v. State 64 N.W.2d 166 Minn. 1954
-
Carroll v. State
64 N.W.2d 166
Minn. 1954
Co. 232 Minn. 422 , 45 N. W. [2d] 782), and it is for that reason that the law in effect at that time governs.
- Pittman v. Pillsbury Flour Mills, Inc. 48 N.W.2d 735 Minn. 1951
-
Pittman v. Pillsbury Flour Mills, Inc.
48 N.W.2d 735
Minn. 1951
Co. 232 Minn. 422 , 45 N. W. (2d) 782 .