DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Yeager v. Chapman, 45 N.W.2d 776.

30 citing documents.

  • Olson v. Ford Motor Co. 558 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 1997
  • Olson v. Ford Motor Co. 558 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 1997
    Olson’s final constitutional argument is that applying the seat belt gag rule to his cause of action violates his right under the state and federal Due Process Clauses to “present all pertinent and material evidence without the imposition of burdensome restrictions.” See Yeager v. Chapman, 233 Minn. 1, 10
  • Berry v. Haertel 170 N.W.2d 558 Minn. 1969
  • Berry v. Haertel 170 N.W.2d 558 Minn. 1969
    ve applied the rule adopted by Restatement, Torts, § 332: “A business visitor is a person who is invited or permitted to enter or remain on land in the possession of another for a purpose directly or indirectly connected with business dealings between them.” 1 See, Klingbeil v. Truesdell, 256 Minn. 360 , 98 N. W. (2d) 134 ; Meyer v. Mitchell, 248 Minn. 397 , 80 N. W. (2d) 450 ; Yeager v. Chapman, 233 Minn. 1 , 45 N. W. (2d) 776 , 22 A. L. R. (2d) 1260.
  • Hillesheim v. Stippel 166 N.W.2d 325 Minn. 1969
  • Hillesheim v. Stippel 166 N.W.2d 325 Minn. 1969
    Yeager v. Chapman, 233 Minn. 1 , 45 N. W. (2d) 776 , 22 A. L. R. (2d) 1260.
  • Hedglin v. Church of St. Paul of Sauk Centre 158 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1968
  • Hedglin v. Church of St. Paul of Sauk Centre 158 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1968
    1 On the duty owed business guests or invitees, see Strong v. Shefveland, 249 Minn. 59 , 81 N. W. (2d) 247 ; Anderson v. Winkle, 213 Minn. 77 , 5 N. W. (2d) 355 ; Yeager v. Chapman, 233 Minn. 1 , 45 N. W. (2d) 776 , 22 A. L. R. (2d) 1260; Prosser, Torts (2 ed.) § 78; 2 Harper & James, The Law of Torts, § 27.12; Prosser, Business Visitors and Invitees, 26 Minn. L. Rev. 573 ; Paton, Invitees, 27 Minn. L. Rev. 75 .
  • Tonne v. Becker Grain & Lumber Company 139 N.W.2d 797 Minn. 1966
  • Tonne v. Becker Grain & Lumber Company 139 N.W.2d 797 Minn. 1966
    Ober v. The Golden Rule, 146 Minn. 347 , ; Theisen v. Minnesota Power & Light Co. 200 Minn. 515 , ; Dunham v. Hubert W. White, Inc. 203 Minn. 82 , ; Yeager v. Chapman, 233 Minn. 1 , 45 N. W. (2d) 776 , 22 A. L. R. (2d) 1260; Lincoln v. Cambridge-Radisson Co. 235 Minn. 20 , 49 N. W. (2d) 1 ; Johnson v. Brand Stores, Inc. 241 Minn. 388 , 63 N. W. (2d) 370 ; Zuercher v. Northern Jobbing Co. 243 Minn. 166 , 66 N. W. (2d) 892 ; Standafer v. First Nat.
  • Blattner v. Loyal Order of Moose 117 N.W.2d 570 Minn. 1962
  • Blattner v. Loyal Order of Moose 117 N.W.2d 570 Minn. 1962
    In Yeager v. Chapman, 233 Minn. 1 , 45 N. W. (2d) 776 , 22 A. L. R. (2d) 1260, which was not sued under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, plaintiff was injured when she appeared at her place of employment an hour early in order to make a hair-dressing appointment.
  • Klingbeil v. Truesdell 98 N.W.2d 134 Minn. 1959
  • Klingbeil v. Truesdell 98 N.W.2d 134 Minn. 1959
    It appears that in Yeager v. Chapman, 233 Minn. 1 , 45 N. W. (2d) 776 , 22 A. L. R. (2d) 1260, we adopted the test in Restatement, Torts, § 332, to the effect that: “A business visitor is a person who is invited or permitted to enter or remain on land in the possession of another for a purpose directly or indirectly connected with business dealings between them.” The
  • Dishington v. A. W. Kuettel & Sons, Inc. 96 N.W.2d 684 Minn. 1959
  • Dishington v. A. W. Kuettel & Sons, Inc. 96 N.W.2d 684 Minn. 1959
    Bank, 243 Minn. 442 , 68 N. W. (2d) 362 ; Zuercher v. Northern Jobbing Co. 243 Minn. 166 , 66 N. W. (2d) 892 ; Yeager v. Chapman, 233 Minn. 1 , 45 N. W. (2d) 776 , 22 A. L. R. (2d) 1260.
  • Mocuik v. Svoboda 93 N.W.2d 547 Minn. 1958
  • Mocuik v. Svoboda 93 N.W.2d 547 Minn. 1958
    5 Yeager v. Chapman, 233 Minn. 1 , 45 N. W. (2d) 776 , 22 A. L. R. (2d) 1260; Schneider v. The Texas Co. 244 Minn. 131 , 69 N. W. (2d) 329 .
  • Lee v. Smith 92 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 1958
  • Lee v. Smith 92 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 1958
    P. & P. R. Co. 239 Minn. 530 , 60 N. W. (2d) 49 ; Ryan v. Griffin, 241 Minn. 91 , 62 N. W. (2d) 504 ; Yeager v. Chapman, 233 Minn. 1 , 45 N. W. (2d) 776 , 22 A. L. R. (2d) 1260.
  • Mattson v. St. Luke's Hospital 89 N.W.2d 743 Minn. 1958
  • Mattson v. St. Luke's Hospital 89 N.W.2d 743 Minn. 1958
    Similarly, the Minnesota cases cited by plaintiff; namely, Dore v. Swift & Co. 175 Minn. 545 , ; Yeager v. Chapman, 233 Minn. 1 , 45 N. W. (2d) 776 , 22 A. L. R. (2d) 1260; and Strong v. Shefveland, 249 Minn. 59 , 81 N. W. (2d) 247 , do not support her contention.
  • Meyer v. Mitchell 80 N.W.2d 450 Minn. 1957
  • Meyer v. Mitchell 80 N.W.2d 450 Minn. 1957
    Bank, 243 Minn. 442 , 68 N. W. (2d) 362 ; Zuercher v. Northern Jobbing Co. 243 Minn. 166 , 66 N. W. (2d) 892 ; Yeager v. Chapman, 233 Minn. 1 , 45 N. W. (2d) 776 , 22 A. L. R. (2d) 1260.
  • Price v. Grieger 70 N.W.2d 421 Minn. 1955
  • Price v. Grieger 70 N.W.2d 421 Minn. 1955
    Yeager v. Chapman, 233 Minn. 1 , 45 N. W. (2d) 776 , 22 A. L. R. (2d) 1260.
  • Standafer v. First National Bank 68 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 1955
  • Standafer v. First National Bank 68 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 1955
    See, Restatement, Torts, § 332, comment h; Yeager v. Chapman, 233 Minn. 1 , 45 N. W. (2d) 776 , 22 A. L. R. (2d) 1260; Prosser, Torts, § 79; 26 Minn. L. Rev. 573 ; 27 Minn. L. Rev. 75 .
  • Zuercher v. Northern Jobbing Co. 66 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 1954
  • Zuercher v. Northern Jobbing Co. 66 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 1954
    2 Restatement, Torts, § 332; Yeager v. Chapman, 233 Minn. 1 , 45 N. W. (2d) 776 , 22 A. L. R. (2d) 1260; Prosser, Torts, p. 635.