DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Frankle v. Twedt, 47 N.W.2d 482.

65 citing documents.

  • Burdick v. Bongard 96 N.W.2d 868 Minn. 1959
    Defendant’s position is that under Tschida v. Dorle, 235 Minn. 461 , 51 N. W. (2d) 561 , and Frankle v. Twedt, 234 Minn. 42 , 47 N. W. (2d) 482 , the right to control is sufficient and an actual exercise of that right is not required.
  • Sackett v. Haeckel 81 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 1957
  • Sackett v. Haeckel 81 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 1957
    1 Jacobsen v. Dailey, 228 Minn. 201 , 36 N. W. (2d) 711 , 11 A. L. R. (2d) 1429; Frankie v. Twedt, 234 Minn. 42 , 47 N. W. (2d) 482 ; Urquhart v. McEvoy, 204 Misc.
  • Laurie v. Mueller 78 N.W.2d 434 Minn. 1956
  • Laurie v. Mueller 78 N.W.2d 434 Minn. 1956
    10 This proposition was recognized by this court in Frankle v. Twedt, 234 Minn. 42, 50 , footnote 5, 47 N. W. (2d) 482, 488 , footnote 4.
  • Swigerd v. City of Ortonville 75 N.W.2d 217 Minn. 1956
  • Swigerd v. City of Ortonville 75 N.W.2d 217 Minn. 1956
    14 See, Frankle v. Twedt, 234 Minn. 42, 48 , 47 N. W. (2d) 482, 487 ; Prosser, Torts, § 63; Restatement, Agency, § 220(2) (c), comment e, and § 227, comment a. 15 The passage from Byrd v. Marion General Hospital, 202 N. C. 337, 341 , 162 S. E. 738, 740 , quoted in the Mesedahl case, is to be interpreted in the light of the controlling facts involved therei
  • Graalum v. Radisson Ramp, Inc. 71 N.W.2d 904 Minn. 1955
  • Graalum v. Radisson Ramp, Inc. 71 N.W.2d 904 Minn. 1955
    Frankle v. Twedt, 234 Minn. 42 , 47 N. W. (2d) 482 ; see, Castner v. Christgau, 222 Minn. 61 , 24 N. W. (2d) 228 .
  • Peters v. Bodin 65 N.W.2d 917 Minn. 1954
  • Peters v. Bodin 65 N.W.2d 917 Minn. 1954
    Frankle v. Twedt, 234 Minn. 42 , 47 N. W. (2d) 482 ; Jacobsen v. Dailey, 228 Minn. 201 , 36 N. W. (2d) 711 , 11 A. L. R. (2d) 1429; Ristau v. Riley, 230 Minn. 341 , 41 N. W. (2d) 772 ; Christensen v. Hennepin Transp.
  • Aleckson v. Kennedy Motor Sales Co. 55 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1952
  • Aleckson v. Kennedy Motor Sales Co. 55 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1952
    In Frankle v. Twedt, 234 Minn. 42, 48 , 47 N. W. (2d) 482, 487 , we pointed out that— “* * * As applied to motor vehicles, it has been held that, although an owner requested her brother to proceed unattended with her automobile to a distant city and return, during the course of which trip she could not possibly direct in detail her brother’s physical
  • Tschida v. Dorle 51 N.W.2d 561 Minn. 1952
  • Tschida v. Dorle 51 N.W.2d 561 Minn. 1952
    *470 The test to be applied in determining the existence of the master-servant relationship is stated in Frankle v. Twedt, 234 Minn. 42, 47 , 47 N. W. (2d) 482, 487 , where we said: “* * * A servant is a person employed by a master to perform service in his affairs whose physical conduct in the performance of such service is controlled or is subject to the right of control by the master.