Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Norris Grain Co. v. Seafarers' International Union of North America, 46 N.W.2d 94.

31 citing documents.

Dennis Sershen, Minn. 2022
the language of the statute is plain, as it is here, “[n]either the wisdom of the laws nor their adequacy to accomplish a desired purpose may be taken into consideration by courts in determining what interpretation the laws should have.” Norris Grain Co. v. Nordaas , see also State Farm Mut.
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission v. County of Hennepin 561 N.W.2d 513 Minn. 1997
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission v. County of Hennepin 561 N.W.2d 513 Minn. 1997
As we have said before: “Neither the wisdom of the laws nor then-adequacy to accomplish a desired purpose may be taken into consideration by courts in determining what interpretation the laws should have; we must give effect to them as they are * * , 232 Minn. 91, 109-10 (1950).
Neitzel v. County of Redwood 521 N.W.2d 73 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Neitzel v. County of Redwood 521 N.W.2d 73 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
No. 11, Anoka-Hennepin, 459 N,W.2d 671, 677-78 (Minn.1990) (when writ of certio-rari was only way to obtain review, district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to decide declaratory judgment action); Norris Grain Co. v. Seafarers’ Int’l Union, 232 Minn. 91, 97 , (order entered by court without subject matter jurisdiction is void).
Jinadu v. Centrust Mortgage Corp. 517 N.W.2d 84 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Jinadu v. Centrust Mortgage Corp. 517 N.W.2d 84 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Norris Grain Co. v. Seafarers’ Int’l Union, 232 Minn. 91, 97
Bouza v. Gallagher 416 N.W.2d 126 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Khabani v. Red Owl Stores 392 N.W.2d 698 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Khabani v. Red Owl Stores 392 N.W.2d 698 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
While we are not unmindful of the implications of this decision, we are guided by the words of the supreme court in Norris Grain Co. v. Seafarers’ International Union, 232 Minn. 91, 109-10 , : Neither the wisdom of the laws nor their adequacy to accomplish a desired purpose may be taken into consideration by courts in determining what interpretation the laws should have; we must give effect to them as they are, regardless of our personal opinion regarding their adequacy.
Laue v. Production Credit Ass'n of Blooming Prairie 390 N.W.2d 823 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Connelly 389 N.W.2d 734 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Connelly 389 N.W.2d 734 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
While we are not unmindful of the implications of this decision for farm, rough-terrain, and other recreational vehicles, and while we question the wisdom of the choice of charge, we are guided by the words of the supreme court in Norris Grain Co. v. Seafarers’ International Union, 232 Minn. 91, 109-10 , : Neither the wisdom of the laws nor their adequacy to accomplish a desired purpose may be taken into consideration by courts in determining what interpretation the laws should have; we must giv
Phillippe v. Commissioner of Public Safety 374 N.W.2d 293 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Phillippe v. Commissioner of Public Safety 374 N.W.2d 293 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
“Neither the wisdom of the laws nor their adequacy to accomplish a desired purpose may be taken into consideration by courts in determining what interpretation the laws should have; we must give effect to them as they are, regardless of our personal opinion regarding their adequacy.” Norris Grain Co. v. Seafarers’ Int’l Union, 232 Minn. 91, 109-10 , , 536 *296 (Minn. July 26, 1985).
Meyer v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Group 371 N.W.2d 535 Minn. 1985
Meyer v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Group 371 N.W.2d 535 Minn. 1985
See Norris Grain Co. v. Seafarers’ Int’l Union, 232 Minn. 91, 109-10 , (“Neither the wisdom of the laws nor their adequacy to accomplish a desired purpose may be taken into consideration by courts in determining what interpretation the law *537 should have; we must give effect to them as they are, regardless of our personal opinion regarding their adequ
Qualley v. Commissioner of Public Safety 349 N.W.2d 305 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Qualley v. Commissioner of Public Safety 349 N.W.2d 305 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Mangos v. Mangos, 264 Minn. 198 , Norris Grain Co. v. Nordaas, 232 Minn. 91
Downtown Development Project, Marshall City Council Resolution No. 57 v. City of Marshall 281 N.W.2d 161 Minn. 1979
Downtown Development Project, Marshall City Council Resolution No. 57 v. City of Marshall 281 N.W.2d 161 Minn. 1979
As we have often said in varying ways: “ ‘ * * * Neither the wisdom of the laws nor their adequacy to accomplish a desired purpose may be taken into consideration by courts in determining what interpretation the laws should have; we must give effect to them as they are, regardless of our personal opinion regarding their adequacy.’ Norris Grain Co. v. Seafarers’ International Union, 232 Minn. 91, 109 , .” 286 Minn. 244 , .
McCarty v. Village of Nashwauk 175 N.W.2d 144 Minn. 1970
McCarty v. Village of Nashwauk 175 N.W.2d 144 Minn. 1970
As we have often said in varying ways: “* * * Neither the wisdom of the laws nor their adequacy to accomplish a desired purpose may be taken into consideration by courts in determining what interpretation the laws should have; we must give effect to them as they are, regardless of our personal opinion regarding their adequacy.” Norris Grain Co. v. Seafarers’ International Union, 232 Minn. 91, 109 , 46 N. W. (2d) 94, 105 .
Interlake Steamship Co. v. Marine Engineers Beneficial Ass'n 108 N.W.2d 627 Minn. 1961
Interlake Steamship Co. v. Marine Engineers Beneficial Ass'n 108 N.W.2d 627 Minn. 1961
To support this contention, they rely on Norris Grain Co. v. Seafarers’ International Union, 232 Minn. 91 , 46 N. W. (2d) 94 , and Faribault Daily News, Inc. v. International Typog.
McLean Distributing Co. v. Brewery & Beverage Drivers, Warehousemen & Helpers Union, Local No. 993 94 N.W.2d 514 Minn. 1959
McLean Distributing Co. v. Brewery & Beverage Drivers, Warehousemen & Helpers Union, Local No. 993 94 N.W.2d 514 Minn. 1959
In Norris Grain Co. v. Seafarers’ International Union, 232 Minn. 91, 99 , 46 N. W. (2d) 94, 100 , we said: “The law is now settled that where a case involves a labor dispute in the field of interstate or foreign commerce covered by the national Labor Management Relations Act, 1947, the National Labor Relations Board * * * has exclusive jurisdiction and the state courts have none.
McQuay, Inc. v. International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers 72 N.W.2d 81 Minn. 1955
McQuay, Inc. v. International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers 72 N.W.2d 81 Minn. 1955
Our own court has dealt with certain aspects of this problem in recent years in Norris Grain Co. v. Seafarers’ International Union, 232 Minn. 91 , 46 N. W. (2d) 94 ; Faribault Daily News, Inc. v. International Typographical Union, 236 Minn. 303 , 53 N. W. (2d) 36 ; State ex rel.
Faribault Daily News, Inc. v. International Typographical Union 53 N.W.2d 36 Minn. 1952
Faribault Daily News, Inc. v. International Typographical Union 53 N.W.2d 36 Minn. 1952
In Norris Grain Co. v. Seafarers’ International Union, 232 Minn. 91, 99 , 46 N. W. (2d) 94, 100 , we commented upon the effect of the above federal acts by stating: “The law is now settled that where a case involves a labor dispute in the field of interstate or foreign commerce covered by the national Labor Management Relations Act, 1947, the National Labor Eelations Board * * * has e