DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Adoption of Anderson, 50 N.W.2d 278.

43 citing documents.

  • In re the Marriage of: Carol Lee D'Costa v. Joseph Francis D'Costa Minn. Ct. App. 2016
    In re Adoption of Anderson, 235 Minn. 192, 200
  • In re K.L.B. 759 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
  • In Re Klb 759 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
  • In Re Klb 759 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
    In re Adoption of Anderson, 235 Minn. 192, 197 , see Minn.Stat.
  • In re K.L.B. 759 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
    Adoption statutes, however, are to be liberally construed to accomplish their purpose, and there need not be more than a substantial compliance with their requirements to sustain the validity of the proceeding.” In re Adoption of Anderson, 235 Minn. 192, 197 , see Minn.Stat.
  • In re P.T. 657 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • In Re PT 657 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • In re P.T. 657 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
    In re Adoption of Anderson, 235 Minn. 192, 200
  • In Re PT 657 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
    In re Adoption of Anderson, 235 Minn. 192, 200
  • Heidbreder v. Carton 645 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 2002
  • Heidbreder v. Carton 645 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 2002
    See In re Petition of Jordet, 248 Minn. 433, 439 , In re Adoption of Anderson, 235 Minn. 192,197
  • Petition of Anderson 565 N.W.2d 461 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
  • Petition of Anderson 565 N.W.2d 461 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
    In re Anderson, 235 Minn. 192, 197
  • In Re the Welfare of A.M.P. 507 N.W.2d 616 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • In Re the Welfare of A.M.P. 507 N.W.2d 616 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
    In re Anderson, 235 Minn. 192, 197
  • In Re the Welfare of D.L. 486 N.W.2d 375 Minn. 1992
  • In Re the Welfare of D.L. 486 N.W.2d 375 Minn. 1992
    664, 665 (1914); In re Anderson, 235 Minn. 192, 197 , -86 (1951); State ex rel.
  • Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board v. Lecuyer 457 N.W.2d 760 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
  • Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board v. Lecuyer 457 N.W.2d 760 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
    In re Adoption of Anderson, 235 Minn. 192, 199
  • In Re Estate of Braa 452 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 1990
  • In Re Estate of Braa 452 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 1990
    Secondly, In re Anderson, 235 Minn. 192 , is one of the few cases interpreting chapter 260 as it existed in 1956.
  • In re Estate of Braa 442 N.W.2d 354 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
  • In re Estate of Braa 442 N.W.2d 354 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
    The case In re Anderson, 235 Minn. 192 , upon which the probate court relied, is one of the few decisions to have interpreted chapter 260 as it stood at the time of Virginia’s commitment.
  • Matter of Welfare of HGB 306 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 1981
    As we have recognized, “[t]he law secures their parental right only so long as they shall promptly recognize and discharge their corresponding obligations.” Anderson v. Gibson, 235 Minn. 192 , 200, , 284 (1951).
  • Soo Line Railroad v. Commissioner of Revenue 277 N.W.2d 7 Minn. 1979
  • Soo Line Railroad v. Commissioner of Revenue 277 N.W.2d 7 Minn. 1979
    It is well settled that: “Rulings of the attorney general, when they have been acted upon and gone unchallenged for many years, are of much persuasive weight in statutory construction.” In re Adoption of Anderson, 235 Minn. 192, 199
  • Matter of Welfare of Rosenbloom 266 N.W.2d 888 Minn. 1978
  • Matter of Welfare of Rosenbloom 266 N.W.2d 888 Minn. 1978
    As the court stated in In re Adoption of Anderson, 235 Minn. 192, 200 , : "* * * Parental rights, however, are not absolute and are not to be unduly exalted and enforced to the detriment of the child's welfare and happiness.
  • In Re Martinson 177 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 1970
  • In Re Martinson 177 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 1970
    In In re Adoption of Anderson, 235 Minn. 192, 200 , , this court said: "* * * The right of parentage is not an absolute right of property, but is in the nature of a trust reposed in them, and is subject to [the parents'] *810 correlative duty to protect and care for the child.
  • In Re Brennan 134 N.W.2d 126 Minn. 1965
  • Sadden v. Lutheran Welfare Service 134 N.W.2d 126 Minn. 1965
  • Sadden v. Lutheran Welfare Service 134 N.W.2d 126 Minn. 1965
    They cite In re Adoption of Anderson, 235 Minn. 192, 197 , 50 N. W. (2d) 278, 283 , to the effect that “[t]he power to decree an adoption being purely statutory, the statute is the measure of the court’s authority.” Appellants would have us ignore the real character of this proceeding, which is one by a father to secure custody of his illegitimate child.
  • In Re Brennan 134 N.W.2d 126 Minn. 1965
    They cite In re Adoption of Anderson, 235 Minn. 192, 197 , , to the effect that "[t]he power to decree an adoption being purely statutory, the statute is the measure of the court's authority."
  • In Re Alsdurf's Petition 133 N.W.2d 479 Minn. 1965
  • State ex rel. Sadler v. Alsdurf 133 N.W.2d 479 Minn. 1965
  • In Re Alsdurf's Petition 133 N.W.2d 479 Minn. 1965
    1016 ; In re Adoption of Anderson, 235 Minn. 192 , ; In re Petition of Jordet, 248 Minn. 433 , .
  • In Re Petition of Parks 267 Minn. 468 Minn. 1964
  • In Re Petition of Parks 267 Minn. 468 Minn. 1964
    See, also, In re Adoption of Anderson, 235 Minn. 192 , 50 N.W.
  • Jordet v. Wilkinson 80 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1957
  • Jordet v. Wilkinson 80 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1957
    In re Adoption of Anderson, 235 Minn. 192 , 50 N. W. (2d) 278 .
  • Sherman v. Bureau of Catholic Charities 63 N.W.2d 573 Minn. 1954
  • Sherman v. Bureau of Catholic Charities 63 N.W.2d 573 Minn. 1954
    In In re Adoption of Anderson, 235 Minn. 192, 202 , 50 N. W. (2d) 278, 285 , this court said: “* * * By its very nature, a proceeding for the committal of the person of a dependent or delinquent child to the custody of a statutory agency for placement for adoption is simply a protective measure designed to provide the child with guardianship representation and p