Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite First National Bank of Mankato v. Wilson, 47 N.W.2d 764.

27 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Surveillance and Integrity Review (SIRS) Appeal by Nobility Home Health Care, Inc. A21-1477, … Minn. 2024
In the Matter of the Surveillance and Integrity Review (SIRS) Appeal by Nobility Home Health Care, Inc. A21-1477, … Minn. 2024
See, e.g., First Nat’l Smart Choice Health Care Corp. v. Minn. Dep’t of Hum.
In the Matter of the Surveillance and Integrity Review Appeal by Smart Choice Health Care Corporation and Farah … Minn. Ct. App. 2022
See First Nat’l (discussing that “in our statutes the word ‘deemed’ appears to be treated as creating a conclusive presumption”); see also Black’s Law Dictionary 523 (11th ed. 2019) (defining “deem” as “[t]o treat (something) as if (1) it were really something else, or (2) it had the qualities that it does not h
Megan Guetzkow, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Rodney Wayne Kesanen, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(“Even a conveyance fraudulent as to creditors does not deprive the property of its homestead exemption.”); First Nat’l (“[A] conveyance of [a] homes tead cannot be set aside by creditors as fraudulent, even though the debtor conveying the property intends thereby to defraud his creditors.”); Sisco v. Paulson , (“Exempt property [including hom estead property] is not suscept ible of
Ferdinand Leo Gams, Jr., Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Steven Ronald Houghton, Appellant/Cross-Respondent. 884 N.W.2d 611 Minn. 2016
Ferdinand Leo Gams, Jr., Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Steven Ronald Houghton, Appellant/Cross-Respondent. 884 N.W.2d 611 Minn. 2016
See First Nat’l Bank of Mankato v. Wilson, 234 Minn. 160, 164, (adopting the definition of “deemed” as “[t]o hold; consider; adjudge; condemn; determine; treat as if; construe” (quoting Deem, Black’s Law Dictionary (3d ed. 1933))); see also The American Heritage Dictionary 487 (3d ed. 1996) (defining “deem” as “1.
Hutchinson Technology, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue 698 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2005
Hutchinson Technology, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue 698 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2005
We have noted that “in our statutes the word ‘deemed’ appears to be treated as creating a conclusive presumption.” First Nat’l Bank of Mankato v. Wilson, 234 Minn. 160, 164
State Bank in Eden Valley v. Euerle Farms, Inc. 441 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State Bank in Eden Valley v. Euerle Farms, Inc. 441 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
See generally First National Bank of Mankato v. Wilson, 234 Minn. 160, 163
Hentges v. P.H. Feely & Son, Inc. 436 N.W.2d 488 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Hentges v. P.H. Feely & Son, Inc. 436 N.W.2d 488 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Sisco, 232 Minn. at 251 , d at 387 ; see also Northwest Holding Co. v. Evanson, 265 Minn. 562, 567 , (conveyance fraudulent as to creditors does not deprive property of homestead exemption); First National Bank of Mankato v. Wilson, 234 Minn. 160, 163 , (“a conveyance of the homestead cannot be set aside by creditors as fraudulent, even *492 though the debtor conveying the property intends thereby to defraud his creditors”).
Eustice Ex Rel. Eustice v. Jewison 413 N.W.2d 114 Minn. 1987
Eustice Ex Rel. Eustice v. Jewison 413 N.W.2d 114 Minn. 1987
at 698 (citing First National Bank of Mankato v. Wilson, 234 Minn. 160 , ).
First National Bank of Cold Spring v. Jaeger 408 N.W.2d 667 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
First National Bank of Cold Spring v. Jaeger 408 N.W.2d 667 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In First National Bank of Mankato v. Wilson, 234 Minn. 160 , the court stated: Since a homestead is, with few exceptions, exempt from the claims of creditors (§ 510.01) * * *, a conveyance of the homestead cannot be set aside by creditors as fraudulent, even though the debt- or conveying the property intends thereby to defraud his creditors.
Eustice v. Jewison 399 N.W.2d 566 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Eustice v. Jewison 399 N.W.2d 566 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
at 698 (citing First National Bank of Mankato v. Wilson, 234 Minn. 160 , ).
Vickery v. First Bank of LaCrosse 368 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Vickery v. First Bank of LaCrosse 368 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
“The right to sell and convey the homestead is absolute * * First National Bank of Mankato v. Wilson, 234 Minn. 160, 163
Joy v. Cooperative Oil Ass'n 360 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Joy v. Cooperative Oil Ass'n 360 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
This section was the subject of discussion in First National Bank of Mankato v. Wilson, 234 Minn. 160 , where the court held: [T]he conclusion seems inescapable that the legislature intended that any removal from the premises for more than six months should be held, considered, adjudged, construed, or treated as if it were an abandonment unless the one method (filing of notice) specified in the st
Muscala v. Wirtjes 310 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1981
Muscala v. Wirtjes 310 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1981
First National Bank of Mankato v. Wilson, 234 Minn. 160
O'BRIEN v. Johnson 148 N.W.2d 357 Minn. 1967
O'BRIEN v. Johnson 148 N.W.2d 357 Minn. 1967
Bank v. Wilson, 234 Minn. 160, 163 , 47 N. W. (2d) 764, 766 ; Wilson v. First Nat.