Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Otter Tail Power Co. v. Village of Elbow Lake, 49 N.W.2d 197.

25 citing documents.

Olson v. One 1999 Lexus Mn License Plate No. 851ldv Vin: Jt6hf10u6x0079461 924 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 2019
Olson v. One 1999 Lexus Mn License Plate No. 851ldv Vin: Jt6hf10u6x0079461 924 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 2019
decisions [about determinations that a project serves a public purpose]."); Otter Tail Power Co. v. Village of Elbow Lake , 234 Minn. 419 , , 205 (1951) ("We must presume that the village will act in good faith in the performance of its covenants."); State ex rel.
Queen City Construction, Inc. v. City of Rochester 604 N.W.2d 368 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Queen City Construction, Inc. v. City of Rochester 604 N.W.2d 368 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
“Value is not always determined by price alone.” Otter Tail Power Co. v. Village of Elbow Lake, 234 Minn. 419, 425
Telephone Associates Inc. v. St. Louis County Board 350 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Electronics Unlimited, Inc. v. Village of Burnsville 182 N.W.2d 679 Minn. 1971
Electronics Unlimited, Inc. v. Village of Burnsville 182 N.W.2d 679 Minn. 1971
Otter Tail Power Co. v. Village of Elbow Lake, 234 Minn. 419 , 49 N. W. (2d) 197 , 27 A. L. R. (2d) 906; Nielsen v. City of St.
Otter Tail Power Company v. MacKichan 133 N.W.2d 511 Minn. 1965
Otter Tail Power Company v. MacKichan 133 N.W.2d 511 Minn. 1965
The attack upon the legality of the contracts raises numerous questions, some of which have been reviewed by this court in Otter Tad Power Co. v. Village of Elbow Lake, 234 Minn. 419 , 49 N. W. (2d) 197 , 27 A. L. R. (2d) 906; Otter Tail Power Co. v. Village of Wheaton, 235 Minn. 123 , 49 N. W. (2d) 804 ; Davies v. Village of Madelia, 205 Minn. 526 , ; and Duffy v. Village of Princeton, 240 Minn. 9 , 60 N. W. (2d) 27 .
Gephart v. Hospital Facility Building Commission 132 N.W.2d 738 Minn. 1965
Gephart v. Hospital Facility Building Commission 132 N.W.2d 738 Minn. 1965
Otter Tail Power Co. v. Village of Elbow Lake, 234 Minn. 419, 423 , 49 N. W. (2d) 197, 201 , 27 A. L. R. (2d) 906; Ambrozich v. City of Eveleth, 200 Minn. 473, 481 , .
Foley Brothers, Inc. v. Marshall 123 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 1963
Foley Brothers, Inc. v. Marshall 123 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 1963
person, firm, association, or corporation to whom such contract is to be awarded, certifying that such person, firm, association, or corporation has not, either directly or indirectly, entered into any agreement, participated in any collusion, or otherwise taken any action in restraint of free competitive bidding in connection with such contract.” 2 Otter Tail Power Co. v. Village of Elbow Lake, 234 Minn. 419 , 49 N. W. (2d) 197 , 27 A. L. R. (2d) 906; Duffy v. Village of Princeton, 240 Minn. 9
Leskinen v. Pucelj 115 N.W.2d 346 Minn. 1962
Leskinen v. Pucelj 115 N.W.2d 346 Minn. 1962
In Otter Tail Power *470 Co. v. Village of Elbow Lake, 234 Minn. 419, 424 , 49 N. W. (2d) 197, 201 , 27 A. L. R. (2d) 906, 913, we held that: “* * * where bids are received on items of equipment which are not capable of precise or exact specifications, a municipality may exercise a reasonable discretion in determining who is the lowest responsible bidder and, in so doing, may consider
Naftalin v. King 102 N.W.2d 301 Minn. 1960
Nielsen v. City of St. Paul 88 N.W.2d 853 Minn. 1958
Nielsen v. City of St. Paul 88 N.W.2d 853 Minn. 1958
Paul City Charter, § 297, provides: 2 See, Otter Tail Power Co. v. Village of Elbow Lake, 234 Minn. 419 , 49 N. W. (2d) 197 , 27 A. L. R. (2d) 906; Coller v. City of St.
Hertz Drive-Ur-Self System, Inc. v. Tucson Airport Authority 299 P.2d 1071 Ariz. 1956
Griswold v. County of Ramsey 65 N.W.2d 647 Minn. 1954
Griswold v. County of Ramsey 65 N.W.2d 647 Minn. 1954
In Otter Tail Power Co. v. Village of Elbow Lake, 234 Minn. 419, 428 , 49 N. W. (2d) 197, 203 , 27 A. L. R. (2d) 906, a similar distinction was drawn as to the bidding statutes applicable to villages.
Duffy v. Village of Princeton 60 N.W.2d 27 Minn. 1953
Duffy v. Village of Princeton 60 N.W.2d 27 Minn. 1953
Otter Tail Power Co. v. Village of Elbow Lake, 234 Minn. 419 , 49 N. W. (2d) 197 , 27 A. L. R. (2d) 906.
Otter Tail Power Co. v. Village of Wheaton 49 N.W.2d 804 Minn. 1951
Otter Tail Power Co. v. Village of Wheaton 49 N.W.2d 804 Minn. 1951
We can do no better than hold, as this court held in Otter Tail Power Co. v. Village of Elbow Lake, 234 Minn. 419, 423, 425 , 49 N. W. (2d) 197, 201 , that— “where bids are requested on equipment that is not subject to exact specifications, the council must be allowed some latitude in considering not only the price but the suitability of the article for the use for which it is intended.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by