DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Ehmke v. Hill, 51 N.W.2d 811.

36 citing documents.

  • Christie v. Estate 911 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 2018
  • Christie v. Estate 911 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 2018
    See, e.g. , Ehmke v. Hill , 236 Minn. 60 , , 817 (1952) ("To warrant specific performance of an oral contract to give real property by will, the contract ...
  • In Re Estate of Trobaugh 380 N.W.2d 152 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • In Re Estate of Trobaugh 380 N.W.2d 152 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    See Ehmke v. Hill, 236 Minn. 60 , (fraud theory of part performance discussed in context of removing oral contract to transfer land from purview of statute of frauds); (same).
  • In Re Guardianship of Huesman 354 N.W.2d 860 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • In Re Guardianship of Huesman 354 N.W.2d 860 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    Ehmke v. Hill, 236 Minn. 60, 68-69
  • Sigler v. First American National Bank of St. Cloud 325 N.W.2d 136 Minn. 1982
  • Sigler v. First American National Bank of St. Cloud 325 N.W.2d 136 Minn. 1982
    Del Hayes & Sons, Inc. v. Mitchell, 304 Minn. 275 , Ehmke v. Hill, 236 Minn. 60
  • Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. Wagner 207 N.W.2d 354 Minn. 1973
  • Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. Wagner 207 N.W.2d 354 Minn. 1973
    Ehmke v. Hill, 236 Minn. 60
  • Husbyn v. Lunde 166 N.W.2d 333 Minn. 1969
  • Husbyn v. Lunde 166 N.W.2d 333 Minn. 1969
    induced without sharp practice, misrepresentation, or mistake; (d) its enforcement must not cause unreasonable or disproportionate hardship or loss to the defendants or to third persons; and (e) it must have been performed in such a maimer and by the rendering of services of such a nature or under such circumstances that the beneficiary cannot be properly compensated in damages.” 1 Ehmke v. Hill, 236 Minn. 60, 69 , 51 N. W. (2d) 811, 817 .
  • Johnson v. Johnson 137 N.W.2d 840 Minn. 1965
  • Johnson v. Johnson 137 N.W.2d 840 Minn. 1965
    The principle of law which the trial court applied in determining the issue of defendant’s alleged right to specific performance of an oral contract is stated in Ehmke v. Hill, 236 Minn. 60, 69 , 51 N. W. (2d) 811, 817 , which holds that to warrant specific performance of an oral contract to convey real estate (a) the contract must be established by clear, positive, and convincing evidence; (b) it must have been made for an adequate consideration and upon terms which are otherwise fair and reaso
  • Equipment Advertiser, Inc. v. Harris 136 N.W.2d 302 Minn. 1965
  • Equipment Advertiser, Inc. v. Harris 136 N.W.2d 302 Minn. 1965
    Ehmke v. Hill, 236 Minn. 60 , 51 N. W. (2d) 811 ; Board of Education v. Sand, 227 Minn. 202 , 34 *455 N. W. (2d) 689.
  • Nelson v. Tripp 118 N.W.2d 805 Minn. 1962
  • Nelson v. Tripp 118 N.W.2d 805 Minn. 1962
    Hynan v. First Trust Co. 258 Minn. 118 , 103 N. W. (2d) 209 ; Ehmke v. Hill, 236 Minn. 60 , 51 N. W. (2d) 811 .
  • Tjanetopoulos v. Margares 98 N.W.2d 97 Minn. 1959
  • Tjanetopoulos v. Margares 98 N.W.2d 97 Minn. 1959
    They are set forth in Ehmke v. Hill, 236 Minn. 60, 68 , 51 N. W. (2d) 811, 817 , as follows: “* * * an oral contract for the transfer of an interest in land, whether by conveyance or by will, may be removed from the purview of the statute of frauds [M. S. A. 513.04] on either the unequivocal reference theory or on the fraud theory of part performance.” In Alsdorf v.
  • Caldis v. Curtis Hotel Co. 95 N.W.2d 641 Minn. 1959
  • Caldis v. Curtis Hotel Co. 95 N.W.2d 641 Minn. 1959
    In support of this contention they *101 cite Ehmke v. Hill, 236 Minn. 60 , 51 N. W. (2d) 811 , in which this court permitted testimony as to conversations between surviving witnesses and a decedent.
  • Dempsey v. Meighen 90 N.W.2d 178 Minn. 1958
  • Dempsey v. Meighen 90 N.W.2d 178 Minn. 1958
    Ehmke v. Hill, 236 Minn. 60 , 51 N. W. (2d) 811 ; Board of Education v. Sand, 227 Minn. 202 , 34 N. W. (2d) 689 ; Waldron v. Page, 191 Minn. 302 , ; Callahan v. City of Duluth, 197 Minn. 403 , ; 1 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Camenker v. Greene 86 N.W.2d 708 Minn. 1957
  • Camenker v. Greene 86 N.W.2d 708 Minn. 1957
    See, Ehmke v. Hill, 236 Minn. 60 , 51 N. W. (2d) 811 ; 31 Minn. L. Rev. 497 .
  • State v. Stevens 75 N.W.2d 903 Minn. 1956
  • State v. Stevens 75 N.W.2d 903 Minn. 1956
    Ehmke v. Hill, 236 Minn. 60 , 51 N. W. (2d) 811 .
  • Pearson v. Bertelson 69 N.W.2d 621 Minn. 1955
  • Pearson v. Bertelson 69 N.W.2d 621 Minn. 1955
    6 Ehmke v. Hill, 236 Minn. 60 , 51 N. W. (2d) 811 .
  • STANDARD CONSTRUCTION CO. INC. v. National Tea Co. 62 N.W.2d 201 Minn. 1953
  • STANDARD CONSTRUCTION CO. INC. v. National Tea Co. 62 N.W.2d 201 Minn. 1953
    Knutson v. Lasher, 219 Minn. 594 , 18 N. W. (2d) 688 ; Meiners v. Kennedy, 221 Minn. 6 , 20 N. W. (2d) 539 ; Ehmke v. Hill, 236 Minn. 60 , 51 N. W. (2d) 811 ; 1 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Mitchell v. Morten 54 N.W.2d 333 Minn. 1952
  • Mitchell v. Morten 54 N.W.2d 333 Minn. 1952
    Ehmke v. Hill, 236 Minn. 60 , 51 N. W. (2d) 811 ; Bowers v. Schuler, 54 Minn. 99 , ; Geraghty v. Kilroy, 103 Minn. 286 , ; Keough v. St.
  • Burke v. Fine 51 N.W.2d 818 Minn. 1952
  • Burke v. Fine 51 N.W.2d 818 Minn. 1952
    Ehmke v. Hill, 236 Minn. 60 , 51 N. W. (2d) 811 .