Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 53 N.W.2d 454.

150 citing documents.

In Re the Welfare of B.J.J. 476 N.W.2d 525 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
In Re the Welfare of B.J.J. 476 N.W.2d 525 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Hinz v. Northland Milk and Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 30
Chapman v. Special School District No. 1 454 N.W.2d 921 Minn. 1990
Chapman v. Special School District No. 1 454 N.W.2d 921 Minn. 1990
Motions brought pursuant to clauses (d), (e) and (f) must be brought within a “reasonable time.” These motions are denied or granted at the discretion of the trial court after it considers the facts before it and after it has applied the four-factor test adopted in Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 30
Western Lake Superior Sanitary District v. Interpace Corp. 454 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Western Lake Superior Sanitary District v. Interpace Corp. 454 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
See Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 30
Thorp Loan and Thrift Co. v. Morse 451 N.W.2d 361 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Thorp Loan and Thrift Co. v. Morse 451 N.W.2d 361 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 30
Hovelson v. U.S. Swim & Fitness, Inc. 450 N.W.2d 137 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Hovelson v. U.S. Swim & Fitness, Inc. 450 N.W.2d 137 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 31 , Gelco Corp. v. Crystal Leasing, Inc.
In Re the Estate of McCue 449 N.W.2d 509 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
In Re the Estate of McCue 449 N.W.2d 509 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 30 , -56 (1952) (footnotes omitted) (emphasis in original).
Seiberlich v. Burlington Northern Railroad 447 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Seiberlich v. Burlington Northern Railroad 447 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
When a party seeks relief from judgment under the “excusable neglect” provision of Rule 60.02, the trial cóurt will grant relief if the party has met the four-part test set forth in Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 30 , -56 (1952).
Pearce v. Lindstrom 443 N.W.2d 857 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Pearce v. Lindstrom 443 N.W.2d 857 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 30 , (applying Him test).
Zetah v. Isaacs 428 N.W.2d 96 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Zetah v. Isaacs 428 N.W.2d 96 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
The court analyzed the bank’s right to relief under the four-part test articulated in Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28 , in which the supreme court held that it is the duty of the trial court, in furthering justice by adopting a liberal policy conducive to the trial of causes on their merits, to grant a motion to open a default judgment and permit a party to answer, if the party in default shows that he (a) is po
Riemer v. Zahn 420 N.W.2d 659 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Riemer v. Zahn 420 N.W.2d 659 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 30 , -56 (1952).
Petrich v. Dyke 419 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Petrich v. Dyke 419 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 30 , -56 (1952).
Peterson v. Skutt Ceramic Products, Inc. 417 N.W.2d 648 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Peterson v. Skutt Ceramic Products, Inc. 417 N.W.2d 648 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Him v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 30 , -56 (1952).
Gruman v. Hendrickson 416 N.W.2d 497 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Gruman v. Hendrickson 416 N.W.2d 497 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 30
Collins v. Cochrane and Bresnahan, P.A. 415 N.W.2d 715 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Collins v. Cochrane and Bresnahan, P.A. 415 N.W.2d 715 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
for rev. denied (Minn. April 29, 1987) (citing Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 30 , -56 (1952)).
Lysholm v. Karlos 414 N.W.2d 773 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Lysholm v. Karlos 414 N.W.2d 773 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 30 , -56 (1952).
Wiethoff v. Williams 413 N.W.2d 533 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Wiethoff v. Williams 413 N.W.2d 533 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 30
Galatovich v. Watson 412 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Galatovich v. Watson 412 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
for rev. denied (Minn. April 29, 1987) (citing Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 30 , -56 (1952)).
Thomas v. Ross 412 N.W.2d 358 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Thomas v. Ross 412 N.W.2d 358 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 30
McKay v. Boyer Ford Trucks, Inc. 411 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
McKay v. Boyer Ford Trucks, Inc. 411 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Hi nz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 30
Halter v. UNI. OF MINN. BD. OF REGENTS 410 N.W.2d 50 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Halter v. UNI. OF MINN. BD. OF REGENTS 410 N.W.2d 50 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 30
Schulz v. Milam 410 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Schulz v. Milam 410 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 30
C & a Enterprises v. Carlson Tractor & Equipment Co. 408 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
C & a Enterprises v. Carlson Tractor & Equipment Co. 408 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 30
Charson v. Temple Israel 405 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Charson v. Temple Israel 405 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
at 271 , d at 750 (quoting Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 30 , -56 (1952)) (footnote omitted).
Armstrong v. Heckman 409 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Armstrong v. Heckman 409 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(quoting Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 30 , ) (footnote omitted).
Rose v. Neubauer 407 N.W.2d 727 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Rose v. Neubauer 407 N.W.2d 727 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 30