Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Kath v. Kath, 55 N.W.2d 691.
-
Denise M. Tessman, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
But a presumption is “merely a procedura l device.” -94 (Minn. 1952).
-
In re the Matter of:
Minn. 2019
.” –94 (Minn. 1952); (noting that a rebuttable presumption is “a legal inference or assumption that a fact exists”) (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
- American National General Insurance Co. v. Solum 641 N.W.2d 891 Minn. 2002
-
American National General Insurance Co. v. Solum
641 N.W.2d 891
Minn. 2002
See Kath v. Kath, 238 Minn. 120, 126 , (acknowledging rule that courts will refuse to exert their powers to extricate a party from the consequences of their own dishonesty); see also Moffett v. Parker, 71 Minn. 139, 144 , 73 N.W.
- State v. Rosenfeld 540 N.W.2d 915 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- Marriage of McKee-Johnson v. Johnson 429 N.W.2d 689 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-
Marriage of McKee-Johnson v. Johnson
429 N.W.2d 689
Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See also Kath v. Kath, 238 Minn. 120, 123
- Rigwald v. Rigwald 423 N.W.2d 701 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-
Rigwald v. Rigwald
423 N.W.2d 701
Minn. Ct. App. 1988
(citing Kath v. Kath, 238 Minn. 120 , ) (post-appeal order null and void because the perfecting of appeal divested the trial court of jurisdiction).
- In Re Estate of Beecham 378 N.W.2d 800 Minn. 1985
-
In Re Estate of Beecham
378 N.W.2d 800
Minn. 1985
Kath v. Kath, 238 Minn. 120, 124 , -94 (1952); Shell Oil Co. v. Kapler, 235 Minn. 292, 300
- Evans v. Blesi 345 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Evans v. Blesi
345 N.W.2d 775
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Kath v. Kath, 238 Minn. 120
- Tschannen ex rel. Tschannen v. Hillsheim 178 N.W.2d 878 Minn. 1970
-
Tschannen ex rel. Tschannen v. Hillsheim
178 N.W.2d 878
Minn. 1970
See, Johnson v. Moore, 275 Minn. 292 , 146 N. W. (2d) 599 ; Kath v. Kath, 238 Minn. 120 , 55 N. W. (2d) 691 ; Reiter v. Porter, 216 Minn. 479 , 13 N. W. (2d) 372 ; Larsen v. N. P. Ry.
- Johnson v. Moore 146 N.W.2d 599 Minn. 1966
-
Johnson v. Moore
146 N.W.2d 599
Minn. 1966
Kath v. Kath, 238 Minn. 120 , 55 N. W. (2d) 691 ; 19 Dunnell, Dig.
- McCormick v. Malecha 122 N.W.2d 446 Minn. 1963
-
McCormick v. Malecha
122 N.W.2d 446
Minn. 1963
Co. 232 Minn. 403 , 45 N. W. (2d) 637 ; Kath v. Kath, 238 Minn. 120 , 55 N. W. (2d) 691 , 37 Minn. L. Rev. 389 ; Giermann v. St.
- Neubauer v. Cloutier 122 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 1963
-
Neubauer v. Cloutier
122 N.W.2d 623
Minn. 1963
When the consideration, exclusive of the value of any lien or encumbrance remaining thereon at the time of sale, exceeds $1,000, the tax shall be $1.10 plus 55 cents for each $500 or fractional part of $500 in excess of $1,000.” 9 Suske v. Straka, 229 Minn. 408 , 39 N. W. (2d) 745 ; Shell Oil Co. v. Kapler, 235 Minn. 292 , 50 N. W. (2d) 707 ; Kath v. Kath, 238 Minn. 120 , 55 N. W. (2d) 691 .
- State v. Keaton 104 N.W.2d 650 Minn. 1960
-
State v. Keaton
104 N.W.2d 650
Minn. 1960
Co. 206 Minn. 562 , ; *364 Roeck v. Halvorson, 254 Minn. 394 , 95 N. W. (2d) 172 ; Lynghaug v. Payte, 247 Minn. 186 , 76 N. W. (2d) 660 , 56 A. L. R. (2d) 1090; Kath v. Kath, 238 Minn. 120 , 55 N. W. (2d) 691 ; Knuth v. Murphy, 237 Minn. 225 , 54 N. W. (2d) 771 .
- State v. Higgin 99 N.W.2d 902 Minn. 1959
-
State v. Higgin
99 N.W.2d 902
Minn. 1959
7 See, also, Roeck v. Halvorson, 254 Minn. 394 , 95 N. W. (2d) 172 ; Lynghaug v. Payte, 247 Minn. 186 , 76 N. W. (2d) 660 , 56 A. L. R. (2d) 1090; Kath v. Kath, 238 Minn. 120 , 55 N. W. (2d) 691 ; Knuth v. Murphy, 237 Minn. 225 , 54 N. W. (2d) 771 .