Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Kath v. Kath, 55 N.W.2d 691.

25 citing documents.

  • Denise M. Tessman, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
    But a presumption is “merely a procedura l device.” -94 (Minn. 1952).
  • In re the Matter of: Minn. 2019
    .” –94 (Minn. 1952); (noting that a rebuttable presumption is “a legal inference or assumption that a fact exists”) (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
  • American National General Insurance Co. v. Solum 641 N.W.2d 891 Minn. 2002
  • American National General Insurance Co. v. Solum 641 N.W.2d 891 Minn. 2002
    See Kath v. Kath, 238 Minn. 120, 126 , (acknowledging rule that courts will refuse to exert their powers to extricate a party from the consequences of their own dishonesty); see also Moffett v. Parker, 71 Minn. 139, 144 , 73 N.W.
  • State v. Rosenfeld 540 N.W.2d 915 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
  • Marriage of McKee-Johnson v. Johnson 429 N.W.2d 689 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • Marriage of McKee-Johnson v. Johnson 429 N.W.2d 689 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
    See also Kath v. Kath, 238 Minn. 120, 123
  • Rigwald v. Rigwald 423 N.W.2d 701 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • Rigwald v. Rigwald 423 N.W.2d 701 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
    (citing Kath v. Kath, 238 Minn. 120 , ) (post-appeal order null and void because the perfecting of appeal divested the trial court of jurisdiction).
  • In Re Estate of Beecham 378 N.W.2d 800 Minn. 1985
  • In Re Estate of Beecham 378 N.W.2d 800 Minn. 1985
    Kath v. Kath, 238 Minn. 120, 124 , -94 (1952); Shell Oil Co. v. Kapler, 235 Minn. 292, 300
  • Evans v. Blesi 345 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • Evans v. Blesi 345 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    Kath v. Kath, 238 Minn. 120
  • Tschannen ex rel. Tschannen v. Hillsheim 178 N.W.2d 878 Minn. 1970
  • Tschannen ex rel. Tschannen v. Hillsheim 178 N.W.2d 878 Minn. 1970
    See, Johnson v. Moore, 275 Minn. 292 , 146 N. W. (2d) 599 ; Kath v. Kath, 238 Minn. 120 , 55 N. W. (2d) 691 ; Reiter v. Porter, 216 Minn. 479 , 13 N. W. (2d) 372 ; Larsen v. N. P. Ry.
  • Johnson v. Moore 146 N.W.2d 599 Minn. 1966
  • Johnson v. Moore 146 N.W.2d 599 Minn. 1966
    Kath v. Kath, 238 Minn. 120 , 55 N. W. (2d) 691 ; 19 Dunnell, Dig.
  • McCormick v. Malecha 122 N.W.2d 446 Minn. 1963
  • McCormick v. Malecha 122 N.W.2d 446 Minn. 1963
    Co. 232 Minn. 403 , 45 N. W. (2d) 637 ; Kath v. Kath, 238 Minn. 120 , 55 N. W. (2d) 691 , 37 Minn. L. Rev. 389 ; Giermann v. St.
  • Neubauer v. Cloutier 122 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 1963
  • Neubauer v. Cloutier 122 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 1963
    When the consideration, exclusive of the value of any lien or encumbrance remaining thereon at the time of sale, exceeds $1,000, the tax shall be $1.10 plus 55 cents for each $500 or fractional part of $500 in excess of $1,000.” 9 Suske v. Straka, 229 Minn. 408 , 39 N. W. (2d) 745 ; Shell Oil Co. v. Kapler, 235 Minn. 292 , 50 N. W. (2d) 707 ; Kath v. Kath, 238 Minn. 120 , 55 N. W. (2d) 691 .
  • State v. Keaton 104 N.W.2d 650 Minn. 1960
  • State v. Keaton 104 N.W.2d 650 Minn. 1960
    Co. 206 Minn. 562 , ; *364 Roeck v. Halvorson, 254 Minn. 394 , 95 N. W. (2d) 172 ; Lynghaug v. Payte, 247 Minn. 186 , 76 N. W. (2d) 660 , 56 A. L. R. (2d) 1090; Kath v. Kath, 238 Minn. 120 , 55 N. W. (2d) 691 ; Knuth v. Murphy, 237 Minn. 225 , 54 N. W. (2d) 771 .
  • State v. Higgin 99 N.W.2d 902 Minn. 1959
  • State v. Higgin 99 N.W.2d 902 Minn. 1959
    7 See, also, Roeck v. Halvorson, 254 Minn. 394 , 95 N. W. (2d) 172 ; Lynghaug v. Payte, 247 Minn. 186 , 76 N. W. (2d) 660 , 56 A. L. R. (2d) 1090; Kath v. Kath, 238 Minn. 120 , 55 N. W. (2d) 691 ; Knuth v. Murphy, 237 Minn. 225 , 54 N. W. (2d) 771 .