Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Crawford v. Woodrich Construction Co. Inc., 57 N.W.2d 648.

29 citing documents.

Douglas Speltz v. Interplastic Corporation, and third party v. Egan Company, Respondent./li> Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Douglas Speltz v. Interplastic Corporation, and third party v. Egan Company, Respondent./li> Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Co., 239 Minn. 12, 22, (holding two employers not engaged on same project when one performed construction work and other inspected work).
O'MALLEY v. Ulland Bros. 549 N.W.2d 889 Minn. 1996
Kolby v. Northwest Produce Co., Inc. 505 N.W.2d 648 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Kolby v. Northwest Produce Co., Inc. 505 N.W.2d 648 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Mervin v. Magney Construction Co. 399 N.W.2d 579 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Mervin v. Magney Construction Co. 399 N.W.2d 579 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Newland v. Overland Express, Inc., Crawford v. Woodrich Construction Co., 239 Minn. 12, 19-20
Atlantic Mutual Insurance Co. v. Judd Co. 380 N.W.2d 122 Minn. 1986
Atlantic Mutual Insurance Co. v. Judd Co. 380 N.W.2d 122 Minn. 1986
Crawford v. Woodrich Construction Co., 239 Minn. 12, 26
Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co. 284 N.W.2d 180 Minn. 1979
Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co. 284 N.W.2d 180 Minn. 1979
6 Cf., Crawford v. Woodrich Construction Co. Inc., 239 Minn. 12, 23
Gillen v. Commissioner of Taxation 232 N.W.2d 894 Minn. 1975
Gillen v. Commissioner of Taxation 232 N.W.2d 894 Minn. 1975
Crawford v. Woodrich Const. Co. Inc. 239 Minn. 12 , 1B Dunnell, Dig.
Larson v. Montpetit 147 N.W.2d 580 Minn. 1966
Larson v. Montpetit 147 N.W.2d 580 Minn. 1966
Since a defendant may not be relieved of liability by an intervening cause which could reasonably be foreseen, Johnson v. Scully Const. Co. 255 Minn. 41 , 95 N. W. (2d) 409 ; Peterson v. Richfield Plaza, Inc. 252 Minn. 215 , 89 N. W. (2d) 712 ; Crawford v. Woodrich Const. Co. 239 Minn. 12 , 57 N. W. (2d) 648 ; Eichten v. Central Minn. Co-op.
Knutson v. Nielsen 99 N.W.2d 215 Minn. 1959
Knutson v. Nielsen 99 N.W.2d 215 Minn. 1959
Power Assn. 224 Minn. 180 , 28 N. W. (2d) 862 , and Crawford v. Woodrich Const. Co. Inc. 239 Minn. 12 , 57 N. W. (2d) 648 .
McCourtie v. United States Steel Corp. 93 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 1958
McCourtie v. United States Steel Corp. 93 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 1958
It was a case where, as Mr. Justice Olson expressed it in the Gleason case ( 214 Minn. 511 , 8 N. W. [2d] 814) “the masters have joined forces and in effect have put the servants into a common pool.” The foregoing interpretation of the statutory language since the Gentle case in 1942 led to the further conclusion by this court in 1953 in Crawford v. Woodrich Const. Co. Inc. 239 Minn. 12, 20 , 57 N. W. (2d) 648, 653 , that the statutory phrases “common enterprise” and the “accomplishment of the s
Woodrich Construction Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America 89 N.W.2d 412 Minn. 1958
Woodrich Construction Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America 89 N.W.2d 412 Minn. 1958
Plaintiff, Woodrich Construction Company (herein called Woodrich), a general contractor engaged in road construction work, was one of the defendants in an earlier action appealed to this court, namely, Crawford v. Woodrich Const. Co. Inc. 239 Minn. 12 , 57 N. W. (2d) 648 .
Patton v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 71 N.W.2d 861 Minn. 1955
Patton v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 71 N.W.2d 861 Minn. 1955
Paul, 234 Minn. 18 , 47 N. W. (2d) 465 ; Crawford v. Woodrich Const. Co. Inc. 239 Minn. 12 , 57 N. W. (2d) 648 .
Schneider v. the Texas Co. 69 N.W.2d 329 Minn. 1955
Schneider v. the Texas Co. 69 N.W.2d 329 Minn. 1955
In Crawford v. Woodrich Const. Co. Inc. 239 Minn. 12, 20 , 57 N. W. (2d) 648, 653 , the restrictive provisions of this section were construed to read: “ ‘The provisions of subdivision 1 of this section shall apply only where the employer liable for compensation and the other party or parties legally liable for damages were both either insured or self-insured and were en
Monson v. Arcand 58 N.W.2d 753 Minn. 1953
Monson v. Arcand 58 N.W.2d 753 Minn. 1953
6 Crawford v. Woodrich Const. Co. Inc. 239 Minn. 12, 20 , 57 N. W. (2d) 648, 653 ; Urbanski v. Merchants Motor Freight, Inc. 239 Minn. 63, 69 , 57 N. W. (2d) 686, 689 .
Urbanski v. Merchants Motor Freight, Inc. 57 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 1953
Urbanski v. Merchants Motor Freight, Inc. 57 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 1953
1, and this court’s interpretation of it have recently been reconsidered at length in Crawford v. Wood- *69 rich Const. Co. Inc. 239 Minn. 12 , 57 N. W. (2d) 648 .