DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Brown v. St. Paul City Railway Co., 62 N.W.2d 688.

88 citing documents.

  • Wasmund v. Nunamaker 151 N.W.2d 577 Minn. 1967
  • Wasmund v. Nunamaker 151 N.W.2d 577 Minn. 1967
    Co. 241 Minn. 15 , 62 N. W. (2d) 688 , 44 A. L. R. (2d) 535, this court discussed the harshness of the rule which requires an attorney to subject himself to a finding of contempt and then appeal from the contempt order before a pretrial order can be reviewed, and we there suggested that possibly a better remedy would be to permit the
  • Larson v. Montpetit 147 N.W.2d 580 Minn. 1966
  • Larson v. Montpetit 147 N.W.2d 580 Minn. 1966
    Co. 241 Minn. 15 , 62 N. W. (2d) 688 , 44 A. L. R. (2d) 535, where the court stated that the witness’ only effective remedy is to refuse to produce the documents or information, since once the privileged matter is produced after objection has been overruled, the question of the correctness of the ruling is moot on appeal.
  • Thermorama, Inc. v. Shiller 135 N.W.2d 43 Minn. 1965
  • Thermorama, Inc. v. Shiller 135 N.W.2d 43 Minn. 1965
    Co. 241 Minn. 15 , 62 N. W. (2d) 688 , 44 A. L. R. (2d) 535, we discussed the harshness of the rule which requires an attorney to subject himself to a finding of contempt and then appeal from the contempt order before a pretrial order can be reviewed, and we there suggested that possibly a better remedy would be to permit the use of a
  • Brooks Realty, Inc. v. Aetna Insurance Co. 128 N.W.2d 151 Minn. 1964
  • Brooks Realty, Inc. v. Aetna Insurance Co. 128 N.W.2d 151 Minn. 1964
    Co. 241 Minn. 15 , 28 to 32, 62 N. W. (2d) 688 , 697 to 699, 44 A. L. R. (2d) 535.
  • Schwartz v. Wenger 124 N.W.2d 489 Minn. 1963
  • Schwartz v. Wenger 124 N.W.2d 489 Minn. 1963
    Co. 241 Minn. 15, 34 , 62 N. W. (2d) 688, 700 , 44 A. L. R. (2d) 535.
  • State v. Lender 124 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1963
  • State v. Lender 124 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1963
    Co. 241 Minn. 15 , 62 N. W. (2d) 688 , 44 A. L. R. (2d) 535; State v. Anderson, 247 Minn. 469 , 78 N. W. (2d) 320 .
  • Sabes v. City of Minneapolis 120 N.W.2d 871 Minn. 1963
  • Sabes v. City of Minneapolis 120 N.W.2d 871 Minn. 1963
    Co. 241 Minn. 15, 26 , 62 N. W. (2d) 688, 696 , 44 A. L. R. (2d) 535; Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 248 Minn. 240, 247 , 80 N. W. (2d) 30, 37 .
  • Sprader v. Mueller 121 N.W.2d 176 Minn. 1963
  • Sprader v. Mueller 121 N.W.2d 176 Minn. 1963
    Co. 241 Minn. 15, 34 , 62 N. W. (2d) 688, 701 , 44 A. L. R. (2d) 535; State v. Anderson, 247 Minn. 469, 477 , 78 N. W. (2d) 320, 326 .
  • Roeder v. North American Life Insurance 106 N.W.2d 624 Minn. 1960
  • Roeder v. North American Life Insurance 106 N.W.2d 624 Minn. 1960
    Co. 241 Minn. 15, 26 , 62 N. W. (2d) 688, 696 , 44 A. L. R. (2d) 535, 547, adopted the rule that: “* * * under M. S. A. c. 600 hospital records and charts, properly identified, are admissible when not privileged to prove diagnosis, treatment, or medical history of the patient pertinent to the medical and surgical aspects of the case b
  • Purdy v. Nordquist 95 N.W.2d 91 Minn. 1959
  • In Re Estate and Guardianships of Williams 254 Minn. 272 Minn. 1959
  • In Re Estate and Guardianships of Williams 254 Minn. 272 Minn. 1959
    Co. 241 Minn. 15 , 62 N.W.
  • Purdy v. Nordquist 95 N.W.2d 91 Minn. 1959
    Co. 241 Minn. 15 , 62 N. W. (2d) 688 , 44 A. L. R. (2d) 535; In re Trusteeship Under Will of Melgaard, 187 Minn. 632 , ; see, Asplund v. Brown, 203 Minn. 571 , .
  • Di Re v. Central Livestock Order Buying Co. 91 N.W.2d 453 Minn. 1958
  • Di Re v. Central Livestock Order Buying Co. 91 N.W.2d 453 Minn. 1958
    Co. 241 Minn. 15 , 62 N. W. (2d) 688 , 44 A. L. R. (2d) 535, and cases cited therein.
  • Peterson Ex Rel. Peterson v. Richfield Plaza, Inc. 89 N.W.2d 712 Minn. 1958
  • Peterson Ex Rel. Peterson v. Richfield Plaza, Inc. 89 N.W.2d 712 Minn. 1958
    Co. 241 Minn. 15 , 62 N. W. (2d) 688 , 44 A. L. R. (2d) 535.
  • Lund v. Village of Princeton 85 N.W.2d 197 Minn. 1957
  • Lund v. Village of Princeton 85 N.W.2d 197 Minn. 1957
    Co. 241 Minn. 15 , 62 N. W. (2d) 688 , 44 A. L. R. (2d) 535; Cantrill v. American Mail Line, Ltd. 42 Wash.
  • Annis v. Annis 84 N.W.2d 256 Minn. 1957
  • Annis v. Annis 84 N.W.2d 256 Minn. 1957
    Co. 241 Minn. 15 , 62 N. W. (2d) 688 , 44 A. L. R. (2d) 535, it was error to admit into evidence the records of the Nicollet Clinic pertaining to plaintiff’s injuries.
  • Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 80 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 1956
  • Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 80 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 1956
    Co. 241 Minn. 15, 26 , 62 N. W. (2d) 688, 696 , 44 A. L. R. (2d) 535, 547, we adopted the rule that: “* * * under M. S. A. c. 600 hospital records and charts, properly identified, are admissible when not privileged to prove diagnosis, treatment, or medical history of the patient pertinent to the medical and surgical aspects of the cas
  • State v. Anderson 78 N.W.2d 320 Minn. 1956
  • State v. Anderson 78 N.W.2d 320 Minn. 1956
    Co. 241 Minn. 15, 34 , 62 N. W. (2d) 688, 701 , 44 A. L. R. (2d) 535, 552, we stated that “whether a * * * communication is privileged is a question of fact” and that if “a party litigant claims privilege, the burden rests on him to present facts establishing the privilege * * *.” Thus, here the burden rested upon defendant to establi
  • Baskerville v. Baskerville 75 N.W.2d 762 Minn. 1956
  • Baskerville v. Baskerville 75 N.W.2d 762 Minn. 1956
    Co. 241 Minn. 15, 33 , 62 N. W. (2d) 688, 700 , 44 A. L. R. (2d) 535, for excellent summary of elements of relation.
  • Jeppesen v. Swanson 68 N.W.2d 649 Minn. 1955
  • Jeppesen v. Swanson 68 N.W.2d 649 Minn. 1955
    Co. 241 Minn. 15 , 62 N. W. (2d) 688 .