Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Schleuder v. Soltow, 59 N.W.2d 320.

62 citing documents.

Simon Tharek Duoth, as Trustee and Next of Kin, Taban Tharek v. Steven Mark Wood Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Simon Tharek Duoth, as Trustee and Next of Kin, Taban Tharek v. Steven Mark Wood Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See, (stating “[i]t is a matter of common knowledge” that it is hazardous for a driver not to “respect the right of way”).
Davis v. Liesenfeld 240 N.W.2d 548 Minn. 1976
Davis v. Liesenfeld 240 N.W.2d 548 Minn. 1976
See, Schleuder v. Soltow, 239 Minn. 453, 458
Seivert v. Bass 181 N.W.2d 888 Minn. 1970
Seivert v. Bass 181 N.W.2d 888 Minn. 1970
See, Lapides v. Wagenhals, 285 Minn. 403 , 173 N. W. (2d) 334 ; Schleuder v. Soltow, 239 Minn. 453 , 59 N. W. (2d) 320 .
Lapides v. Wagenhals 173 N.W.2d 334 Minn. 1969
Lapides v. Wagenhals 173 N.W.2d 334 Minn. 1969
Kennedy v. Caudell, 277 Minn. 35 , 151 N. W. (2d) 407 ; Schleu-der v. Soltow, 239 Minn. 453 , 59 N. W. (2d) 320 .
Tauber v. Buffalo Lake Public School District 168 N.W.2d 327 Minn. 1969
Tauber v. Buffalo Lake Public School District 168 N.W.2d 327 Minn. 1969
Since appellant’s counsel pointed out the basis for his objection to the instruction in question both before and at the conclusion of the court’s charge, the failure on the part of the trial court to properly qualify the instruction relating to the reduced-speed statute was reversible error, and defendant Neal therefore is entitled to.a new trial.” In the later case of Schleuder v. Soltow, 239 Minn. 453 , 59 N. W. (2d) 320 , we pointed out that the driver of a vehicle approaching an intersection
Stall v. Christensen 151 N.W.2d 764 Minn. 1967
Stall v. Christensen 151 N.W.2d 764 Minn. 1967
We are required to resolve this issue in favor of defendant on authority of Carter v. Western Union Telegraph Co. 270 Minn. 341 , 133 N. W. (2d) 833 ; Botz v. Krips, 267 Minn. 362 , 126 N. W. (2d) 446 ; Schleuder v. Soltow, 239 Minn. 453 , 59 N. W. (2d) 320 ; Pettit v. Nelson, 206 Minn. 265 , ; and Sathrum v. Lee, 180 Minn. 163 , .
Kennedy v. Caudell 151 N.W.2d 407 Minn. 1967
Kennedy v. Caudell 151 N.W.2d 407 Minn. 1967
Bocchi v. Karnstedt, 238 Minn. 257 , 56 N. W. (2d) 628 ; Schleuder v. Soltow, 239 Minn. 453 , 59 N. W. (2d) 320 ; Olson v. Anderson, 224 Minn. 216 , 28 N. W. (2d) 66 ; Lowery v. Clouse (8 Cir.) 348 F. (2d) 252; Tollefson v. Ehlers, 252 Minn. 370 , 90 N. W. (2d) 205 .
Peterson v. Rodekuhr 143 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 1966
Peterson v. Rodekuhr 143 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 1966
Schleuder v. Soltow, 239 Minn. 453, 460 , 59 N. W. (2d) 320, 325 ; Zickrick v. Strathem, 211 Minn. 329 , 1 N. W. (2d) 134 .
Schlukebier v. LaClair 127 N.W.2d 693 Minn. 1964
Schlukebier v. LaClair 127 N.W.2d 693 Minn. 1964
Fickling v. Nassif, 208 Minn. 538 , ; Schleuder v. Soltow, 239 Minn. 453 , 59 N. W. (2d) 320 .
Pogalz v. Kenna 126 N.W.2d 458 Minn. 1964
Botz v. Krips 126 N.W.2d 446 Minn. 1964
Pogalz v. Kenna 126 N.W.2d 458 Minn. 1964
Plaintiffs cite Olson v. Anderson, 224 Minn. 216 , 28 N. W. (2d) 66 ; Schleuder v. Soltow, 239 Minn. 453 , 59 N. W. (2d) 320 ; and Satter v. Turner, 251 Minn. 1 , 86 N. W. (2d) 85 , 66 A. L. R. (2d) 1178, as controlling.
Botz v. Krips 126 N.W.2d 446 Minn. 1964
He must formulate the request in writing as he thinks it should be given by the court.” In Schleuder v. Soltow, 239 Minn. 453 , 59 N. W. (2d) 320 , at the completion of the arguments to the jury, the defense for the first time requested an instruction embodying Minn. St.
Daugherty v. May Brothers Co. 121 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 1963
Daugherty v. May Brothers Co. 121 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 1963
They cite Schleuder v. Soltow, 239 Minn. 453 , 59 N. W. (2d) 320 , and Dahling v. Damman, 251 Minn. 171 , 87 N. W. (2d) 25 .
Lott v. Davidson 109 N.W.2d 336 Minn. 1961
Lott v. Davidson 109 N.W.2d 336 Minn. 1961
1 Ballweber v. Kleist, 248 Minn. 102 , 78 N. W. (2d) 671 ; Dahling v. Dammann, 251 Minn. 171 , 87 N. W. (2d) 25 ; Schleuder v. Soltow, 239 Minn. 453 , 59 N. W. (2d) 320 ; Jablinske v. Eckstrom, 247 Minn. 140 , 76 N. W. (2d) 654 ; Ryan v. Griffin, 241 Minn. 91 , 62 N. W. (2d) 504 .
Whelan Ex Rel. Whelan v. Gould 106 N.W.2d 893 Minn. 1960
Whelan Ex Rel. Whelan v. Gould 106 N.W.2d 893 Minn. 1960
re approaching so closely on the through highway as to constitute an immediate hazard, but the driver having so yielded may proceed, and the drivers of all other vehicles approaching the intersection on the through highway shall yield the right of way to the vehicles so proceeding into or across the through highway.” The instruction was in accord with the law stated in Schleuder v. Sol- *206 tow, 239 Minn. 453 , 59 N. W. (2d) 320 , and Kolatz v. Kelly, 244 Minn. 163 , 69 N. W. (2d) 649 , and wit
Roeder v. North American Life Insurance 106 N.W.2d 624 Minn. 1960
Roeder v. North American Life Insurance 106 N.W.2d 624 Minn. 1960
Schleuder v. Soltow, 239 Minn. 453 , 59 N. W. (2d) 320 ; Siemers v. United Benefit Life Ins.
Satter v. Turner 100 N.W.2d 660 Minn. 1960
Satter v. Turner 100 N.W.2d 660 Minn. 1960
43 , 49 N. W. (2d) 52 ; Schleuder v. Soltow, 239 Minn. 453 , 59 N. W. (2d) 320 .
Burdick v. Bongard 96 N.W.2d 868 Minn. 1959
Burdick v. Bongard 96 N.W.2d 868 Minn. 1959
1 Schleuder v. Soltow, 239 Minn. 453 , 59 N. W. (2d) 320 ; Leitner v. Pacific Gamble Robinson Co. 223 Minn. 260 , 26 N. W. (2d) 228 ; Dose v. Yager, 231 Minn. 90 , 42 N. W. (2d) 420 ; Norton v. Nelson, 236 Minn. 237 , 53 N. W. (2d) 31 .
Mocuik v. Svoboda 93 N.W.2d 547 Minn. 1958
Mocuik v. Svoboda 93 N.W.2d 547 Minn. 1958
Defendant Tatryn relies on Schleuder v. Soltow, 239 Minn. 453 , 59 N. W. (2d) 320 , and Neal v. Neal, 238 Minn. 292 , 56 N. W. (2d) *568 673, where we held that a driver on a through highway need not reduce his speed in approaching every intersection.
Tollefson v. Ehlers 90 N.W.2d 205 Minn. 1958
Tollefson v. Ehlers 90 N.W.2d 205 Minn. 1958
In Schleuder v. Soltow, 239 Minn. 453, 459 , 59 N. W. (2d) 320, 324 , we said: “* * * a person driving on a through highway at 60 miles an hour in the daytime need not reduce his speed while approaching and passing *374 over intersections along the through highway protected by stop signs where no special hazard exists other than an automobile approaching
Dahling v. Dammann 87 N.W.2d 25 Minn. 1957
Dahling v. Dammann 87 N.W.2d 25 Minn. 1957
This court held in Schleuder v. Soltow, 239 Minn. 453 , 59 N. W. (2d) 320 , subject to certain provisions, that a person driving on a through highway at 60 miles per hour in the daytime need not reduce his speed while approaching and passing over intersections along the through highway protected by stop signs where no special hazard exists other than an automobile approa
Frank v. Stiegler 84 N.W.2d 912 Minn. 1957
Frank v. Stiegler 84 N.W.2d 912 Minn. 1957
Knuth v. Murphy, 237 Minn. 225, 230 , 54 N. W. (2d) 771, 775 ; Schleuder v. Soltow, 239 Minn. 453 , 59 N. W. (2d) 320 .
Satter v. Turner 86 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1957
Satter v. Turner 86 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1957
Olson v. Anderson, 224 Minn. 216 , 28 N. W. (2d) 66 ; Bohnen v. Gorr, 234 Minn. 71 , 47 N. W. (2d) 459 ; Bocchi v. Karnstedt, 238 Minn. 257 , 56 N. W. (2d) 628 ; Schleuder v. Soltow, 239 Minn. 453 , 59 N. W. (2d) 320 .
Mortenson Ex Rel. Mortenson v. Hindahl 77 N.W.2d 185 Minn. 1956
Shastid v. Shue 77 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1956
Shastid v. Shue 77 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1956
Carpenter v. Birkholm, 242 Minn. 379 , 65 N. W. (2d) 250 ; Johnson v. Mancilman, 241 Minn. 461 , 63 N. W. (2d) 569 ; Ryan v. Griffin, 241 Minn. 91 , 62 N. W. (2d) 504 ; Schleuder v. Soltow, 239 Minn. 453 , 59 N. W. (2d) 320 ; Ranum v. Swenson, 220 Minn. 170 , 19 N. W. (2d) 327 .
Mortenson Ex Rel. Mortenson v. Hindahl 77 N.W.2d 185 Minn. 1956
See, Carpenter v. Birkholm, 242 Minn. 379 , 65 N. W. (2d) 250 ; Schleuder v. Soltow, 239 Minn. 453 , 59 N. W. (2d) 320 .
Jablinske v. Eckstrom 76 N.W.2d 654 Minn. 1956
Mottinger v. Halfman 76 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1956