Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Nelson v. Glenwood Hills Hospitals, Inc., 62 N.W.2d 73.

38 citing documents.

Living Word Christian Church, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
DeCook, d at 267-69; Nelson v. Glenwood Hills Hosps., Inc. , Tharp, d at 3.
Jennifer L. DeCook, Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. Olmsted Medical Center, Inc., Brenda J. Hanson, R.N., and Darlene M. Pratt, R.N., … 875 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 2016
Jennifer L. DeCook, Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. Olmsted Medical Center, Inc., Brenda J. Hanson, R.N., and Darlene M. Pratt, R.N., … 875 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 2016
'We have repeatedly interpreted the rules regarding the court’s. acquisition of jurisdiction by summons liberally “to avoid defeating an action merely because of technical and formal defects which could not reasonably have misled or prejudiced a defendant.” See Nelson v. Glenwood Hills Hosps., 240 Minn. 505, 511
Jennifer L. DeCook, Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. Olmsted Medical Center, Kenneth M. Palmer, M.D., Jack F. Perrone, M.D., Ashley Morrow Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jennifer L. DeCook, Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. Olmsted Medical Center, Kenneth M. Palmer, M.D., Jack F. Perrone, M.D., Ashley Morrow Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Nelson v. Glenwood Hills Hospitals, 240 Minn. 505
Eclipse Architectural Group, Inc. v. Lam 814 N.W.2d 692 Minn. 2012
Eclipse Architectural Group, Inc. v. Lam 814 N.W.2d 692 Minn. 2012
P. 4.02, the prohibition on service by a party governs only “service of a summons or other process.” A “summons” is “[a] writ or process commencing the plaintiffs action and requiring the defendant to appear and answer.” Black’s Law Dictionary 1574 (9th ed. 2009); accord Nelson v. Glenwood Hills Hosps., 240 Minn. 505, 512 , (explaining that a summons “constitutes merely a notice to defendant that an action has been commenced and, if no defense is offered or made, a default judgment will be taken
Peterson v. 2004 Ford Crown Victoria Vin: 2FAHP74WX4X158445 792 N.W.2d 454 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Peterson v. 2004 Ford Crown Victoria Vin: 2FAHP74WX4X158445 792 N.W.2d 454 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Save Our Creeks, d at 643 (citing Nelson v. Glenwood Hills Hosps., 240 Minn. 505, 513 , ).
Save Our Creeks v. City of Brooklyn Park 682 N.W.2d 639 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Save Our Creeks v. City of Brooklyn Park 682 N.W.2d 639 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Nelson v. Glenwood Hills Hosps., 240 Minn. 505, 513
Lundgren v. Green 592 N.W.2d 888 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Lundgren v. Green 592 N.W.2d 888 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Finally, the Lundgrens’ reliance on Nelson v. Glenwood Hills Hosps., Inc., 240 Minn. 505 , is misplaced.
Ortiz Ex Rel. Ortiz v. Gavenda 590 N.W.2d 119 Minn. 1999
Carlson v. Hennepin County 479 N.W.2d 50 Minn. 1992
Carlson v. Hennepin County 479 N.W.2d 50 Minn. 1992
For example, see Nelson v. Glenwood Hills Hospitals, 240 Minn. 505 , (plaintiff sued corporation that previously operated hospital), and Lange v. Johnson, 295 Minn. 320 , (plaintiff sued individual instead of corporate entity).
Johnson v. Soo Line Railroad 463 N.W.2d 894 Minn. 1990
Johnson v. Soo Line Railroad 463 N.W.2d 894 Minn. 1990
Nelson v. Glenwood Hills Hospitals, Inc., 240 Minn. 505 , Wise v. Chicago, B. & Q. R.R.
Johnson v. Soo Line Railroad 454 N.W.2d 468 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Johnson v. Soo Line Railroad 454 N.W.2d 468 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Cf. Nelson v. Glenwood Hills Hospital, Inc., 240 Minn. 505, 507 , (state officials erroneously informed counsel that proper defendant had merged with corporation named in original pleadings).
Hovelson v. U.S. Swim & Fitness, Inc. 450 N.W.2d 137 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Hovelson v. U.S. Swim & Fitness, Inc. 450 N.W.2d 137 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Nelson v. Glenwood Hills Hospital, 240 Minn. 505, 512-13
Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co. 448 N.W.2d 865 Minn. 1989
Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co. 448 N.W.2d 865 Minn. 1989
Lange v. Johnson, 295 Minn. 320, 324 , citing Nelson v. Glenwood Hills Hosp., 240 Minn. 505 , 511—13, -78 (1953) (two corporations with some of same officers and directors).
Nordin v. L.S. Donaldson Co. 441 N.W.2d 516 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Nordin v. L.S. Donaldson Co. 441 N.W.2d 516 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
2 See Nelson v. Glenwood Hills Hospitals, 240 Minn. 505, 514
Erickson v. Coast Catamaran Corp. 414 N.W.2d 180 Minn. 1987
Erickson v. Coast Catamaran Corp. 414 N.W.2d 180 Minn. 1987
See, e.g., Nelson v. Glenwood Hills Hospitals, Inc., 240 Minn. 505, 511-13
Chan v. Katzenmeyer 391 N.W.2d 907 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Chan v. Katzenmeyer 391 N.W.2d 907 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Nelson v. Glenwood Hills Hospitals, 240 Minn. 505, 513-14 , -79 (1953) (citations omitted).
Fore v. Crop Hail Management 270 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 1978
Fore v. Crop Hail Management 270 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 1978
As for the second and third, considerations discussed in Nelson v. Glenwood Hills Hospitals, Inc., 240 Minn. 505 , shed light on the question of notice.
Wyman v. Wyman 212 N.W.2d 368 Minn. 1973
Wyman v. Wyman 212 N.W.2d 368 Minn. 1973
In Nelson v. Glenwood Hills Hospitals, Inc. 240 Minn. 505 , we considered the language of Rule 15.03 and stated: “Under this rule an amendment to a complaint or petition setting up no new cause of action will relate back to the commencement of the action * * (Italics supplied.)
Lange v. Johnson 204 N.W.2d 205 Minn. 1973
Lange v. Johnson 204 N.W.2d 205 Minn. 1973
Nelson v. Glenwood Hills Hospitals, Inc. 240 Minn. 505
Hall v. Community Credit Company 178 N.W.2d 245 Minn. 1970
Hall v. Community Credit Company 178 N.W.2d 245 Minn. 1970
Defendants’ reliance upon Nelson v. Glenwood Hills Hospitals, Inc. 240 Minn. 505 , 62 N. W. (2d) 73 , and Speyer v. The Savogran Co. 267 Minn. 67 , 124 N. W. (2d) 827 , is misplaced.