Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State Ex Rel. South St. Paul v. Hetherington, 61 N.W.2d 737.

25 citing documents.

Jennifer Schroeder, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Olson v. One 1999 Lexus Mn License Plate No. 851ldv Vin: Jt6hf10u6x0079461 924 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 2019
Olson v. One 1999 Lexus Mn License Plate No. 851ldv Vin: Jt6hf10u6x0079461 924 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 2019
South Saint Paul v. Hetherington , 240 Minn. 298 , , 742 (1953) ; see also Brookfield Trade Ctr., Inc. v. County of Ramsey , , 876 (Minn. 2000) (stating that evidence is "viewed in the context of a presumption that the county assessor, as a government official, properly performed his official duties and complied with statutory procedures
League of Women Voters Minnesota v. Ritchie 819 N.W.2d 636 Minn. 2012
Coleman v. Ritchie 762 N.W.2d 218 Minn. 2009
Mendota Golf, LLP v. City of Mendota Heights 708 N.W.2d 162 Minn. 2006
Mendota Golf, LLP v. City of Mendota Heights 708 N.W.2d 162 Minn. 2006
Paul v. Hetherington, 240 Minn. 298, 301 , State ex rel.
Arizona Minority Coalition for Fair Redistricting v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission 121 P.3d 843 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Kahn v. Griffin 701 N.W.2d 815 Minn. 2005
Kahn v. Griffin 701 N.W.2d 815 Minn. 2005
Paul v. Hetherington, 240 Minn. 298, 303
Fay v. St. Louis County Board of Commissioners 674 N.W.2d 433 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Fay v. St. Louis County Board of Commissioners 674 N.W.2d 433 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Paul v. Hetherington, 240 Minn. 298, 302
Ziols v. Rice County Board of Commissioners 661 N.W.2d 283 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Ziols v. Rice County Board of Commissioners 661 N.W.2d 283 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Paul v. Hetherington, 240 Minn. 298, 301 , (citation omitted).
Erlandson v. Kiffmeyer 659 N.W.2d 724 Minn. 2003
Erlandson v. Kiffmeyer 659 N.W.2d 724 Minn. 2003
Paul v. Hetherington, 240 Minn. 298, 303
McNamara v. Office of Strategic & Long Range Planning 628 N.W.2d 620 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
McNamara v. Office of Strategic & Long Range Planning 628 N.W.2d 620 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Paul v. Hetherington, 240 Minn. 298, 303 , (stating that the fundamental right to vote is preserved when the electoral system allows the citizen to obtain a reasonable equality of representation).
Scinocca v. St. Louis County Board of Commissioners 281 N.W.2d 659 Minn. 1979
Scinocca v. St. Louis County Board of Commissioners 281 N.W.2d 659 Minn. 1979
Paul v. Hetherington, 240 Minn. 298, 301
Hanlon v. Towey 142 N.W.2d 741 Minn. 1966
Hanlon v. Towey 142 N.W.2d 741 Minn. 1966
Paul v. Hetherington, 240 Minn. 298, 303 , 61 N. W. (2d) 737, 741 , wherein the redistricting of Dakota County was challenged, Mr. Justice Matson declared in language remarkably similar to the expressions of United States Supreme Court decisions uttered long afterward: “* * * xhe right to vote on a basis of reasonable equality with other citizens is a f
State v. Robinson 123 N.W.2d 812 Minn. 1963
Inland Products Corp. v. Donovan Inc. 62 N.W.2d 211 Minn. 1953
Inland Products Corp. v. Donovan Inc. 62 N.W.2d 211 Minn. 1953
Paul v. Hetherington, 240 Minn. 298 , 61 N. W. (2d) 737 ; 1 Dunnell, Dig.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by