Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lavalle Ex Rel. Lavalle v. Kaupp, 61 N.W.2d 228.

30 citing documents.

Clark v. Connor 843 N.W.2d 785 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Clark v. Connor 843 N.W.2d 785 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
with the strict liabihty of an insurer.” Lavalle v. Kaupp, 240 Minn. 360, 363
Engquist v. Loyas 803 N.W.2d 400 Minn. 2011
Engquist v. Loyas 803 N.W.2d 400 Minn. 2011
Previously, we have interpreted the dog-attack statute in three cases that are relevant to this dispute: Lavalle v. Kaupp, 240 Minn. 360
Anderson v. Christopherson 802 N.W.2d 832 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Anderson v. Christopherson 802 N.W.2d 832 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Lavalle v. Kaupp, 240 Minn. 360, 363-64 , -31 (1953).
Lewellin Ex Rel. Heirs of Lewellin v. Huber 465 N.W.2d 62 Minn. 1991
Lewellin Ex Rel. Heirs of Lewellin v. Huber 465 N.W.2d 62 Minn. 1991
(dog bite); (dog bite); (dog bite); Verrett v. Silver, 309 Minn. 275 , (dog bite); Matson v. Kivimaki, 294 Minn. 140 , (dog bite); LaValle v. Kaupp, 240 Minn. 360 , (dog bite); Grams v. Howard's O.K.
Lewellin Ex Rel. Lewellin v. Huber 456 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Lewellin Ex Rel. Lewellin v. Huber 456 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Lavalle v. Kaupp, 240 Minn. 360, 363 , (emphasis supplied).
Boitz v. Preblich 405 N.W.2d 907 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Boitz v. Preblich 405 N.W.2d 907 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Lavalle v. Kaupp, 240 Minn. 360
Bailey Ex Rel. Bailey v. Morris 323 N.W.2d 785 Minn. 1982
Bailey Ex Rel. Bailey v. Morris 323 N.W.2d 785 Minn. 1982
Lavalle v. Kaupp, 240 Minn. 360 , , 40 A.L.R.2d 539 (1953).
Thompson v. Estate of Petroff 319 N.W.2d 400 Minn. 1982
Thompson v. Estate of Petroff 319 N.W.2d 400 Minn. 1982
The history of the Minnesota survival statute is set forth in Lavalle v. Kaupp, 240 Minn. 360 , in which we held that the version of the statute then in effect permitted only causes of action based on negligence to survive the death of the defendant.
Seim Ex Rel. Seim v. Garavalia 306 N.W.2d 806 Minn. 1981
Seim Ex Rel. Seim v. Garavalia 306 N.W.2d 806 Minn. 1981
In Lavalle v. Kaupp, 240 Minn. 360 , violation of the statute was viewed as imposing strict liability and not negligence: A strict liability in damages, irrespective of any question of negligence and without proof of scienter as at common law, is imposed by § 347.22 upon the owner of a dog for injuries which the dog, without provo
Smith v. KAHLER CORPORATION, INC. 211 N.W.2d 146 Minn. 1973
Smith v. KAHLER CORPORATION, INC. 211 N.W.2d 146 Minn. 1973
See, Lavalle v. Kaupp, 240 Minn. 360
Matson v. Kivimaki 200 N.W.2d 164 Minn. 1972
Matson v. Kivimaki 200 N.W.2d 164 Minn. 1972
Lavalle v. Kaupp, 240 Minn. 360, 364
Clark v. Brings 169 N.W.2d 407 Minn. 1969
Clark v. Brings 169 N.W.2d 407 Minn. 1969
E. g., Fake v. Addicks, 45 Minn. 37 , ; Cuney v. Campbell, 76 Minn. 59 , ; Rowe v. Ehrmanntraut, 92 Minn. 17 , ; Maynard v. Keough, 145 Minn. 26 , *76 ; Lavalle v. Kaupp, 240 Minn. 360 , 61 N. W. (2d) 228 , 40 A. L. R. (2d) 539; Anderson v. Anderson, supra.
Dahl v. NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL BANK MINNEAPOLIS 121 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 1963
Dahl v. NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL BANK MINNEAPOLIS 121 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 1963
In Lavalle v. Kaupp, 240 Minn. 360 , 61 N. W. (2d) 228 , 40 A. L. R. (2d) 539, we applied this statute to an action against a deceased defendant to enforce a statutory liability for personal injuries resulting from an attack by defendant’s dog.
Anderson v. Anderson 107 N.W.2d 647 Minn. 1961
Anderson v. Anderson 107 N.W.2d 647 Minn. 1961
3 Lavalle v. Kaupp, 240 Minn. 360 , 61 N. W. (2d) 228 , 40 A. L. R. (2d) 540.
Lynghaug v. Payte 76 N.W.2d 660 Minn. 1956
Lynghaug v. Payte 76 N.W.2d 660 Minn. 1956
11 Lavalle v. Kaupp, 240 Minn. 360, 363 , 61 N. W. (2d) 228, 230 , 40 A. L. R. (2d) 539, 542.