Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Simon v. Carroll, 62 N.W.2d 822.

62 citing documents.

Hanson v. Bailey 83 N.W.2d 252 Minn. 1957
Francis v. Wilson 83 N.W.2d 248 Minn. 1957
Hanson v. Bailey 83 N.W.2d 252 Minn. 1957
7 Simon v. Carroll, 241 Minn. 211 , 62 N. W. (2d) 822 .
Francis v. Wilson 83 N.W.2d 248 Minn. 1957
In Simon v. Carroll, 241 Minn. 211 , 62 N. W. (2d) 822 , this court explained that since the enactment of § 169.18 in 1937 1 custom as a factor in and of itself has had no statutory recognition as a justifiable cause for a motorist’s failure to keep to his right half of a road when such half is of sufficient width and is otherwise reasonably usable.
State v. Axilrod 79 N.W.2d 677 Minn. 1956
State v. Axilrod 79 N.W.2d 677 Minn. 1956
See, Simon v. Carroll, 241 Minn. 211, 221, note 11 , 62 N. W. (2d) 822, 829, note 10 , and authorities there cited; see, also, 36 Minn. L. Rev. 724 , 732.
McCuller v. Workson 78 N.W.2d 340 Minn. 1956
McCuller v. Workson 78 N.W.2d 340 Minn. 1956
3 Simon v. Carroll, 241 Minn. 211 , 62 N. W. (2d) 822 ; Hall v. Minneapolis St.
Brady v. Kroll 70 N.W.2d 354 Minn. 1955
Brady v. Kroll 70 N.W.2d 354 Minn. 1955
*528 In construing this statute in Simon v. Carroll, 241 Minn. 211, 215 , 62 N. W. (2d) 822, 826 , we said: “* * * It follows that, pursuant to § 169.18, subd.
Anderson v. Enfield 70 N.W.2d 409 Minn. 1955
Anderson v. Enfield 70 N.W.2d 409 Minn. 1955
Stedman v. Norlin, 243 Minn. 389 , 68 N. W. (2d) 393 ; Simon v. Carroll, 241 Minn. 211 , 62 N. W. (2d) 822 .