Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Bollenbach, 63 N.W.2d 278.

44 citing documents.

In the Marriage of: Aimee Lynn Speier v. Gary Joseph Speier, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Souhsiung Jack Chiu v. Timbershore Home Owners’ Association and third party plaintiff, vs. New Horizon Homes, Inc., Third … Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Erroneous findings or omitted findings that are not controlling on the outcome of the case “are harmless and do not necessitate a reversal nor would any useful purpose be served by remanding the case for corrected or additional findings.” State by Burnquist v. Bollenbach , 241 Minn. 103, 110
Bradley Wayne Foster v. Lucinda Jesson, Commissioner of Human Services 857 N.W.2d 545 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Bradley Wayne Foster v. Lucinda Jesson, Commissioner of Human Services 857 N.W.2d 545 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Burnquist v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103, 109, ).
Coker v. Jesson 831 N.W.2d 483 Minn. 2013
Explained Coker v. Jesson 831 N.W.2d 483 Minn. 2013
Burnquist v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103, 109
In Re Kaldahl 418 N.W.2d 532 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
In Re Kaldahl 418 N.W.2d 532 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See State v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103, 123
State v. Kaldahl 381 N.W.2d 502 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Kaldahl 381 N.W.2d 502 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Following the parties’ partial stipulation to facts and submission of legal memoranda, the trial court, sitting without a jury, determined that Lake Five was a private body of water since State v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103 , and that Kaldahl had not violated Minn.Stat.
Partnership Investments of Minnesota, Inc. v. Lybeck 243 N.W.2d 150 Minn. 1976
Partnership Investments of Minnesota, Inc. v. Lybeck 243 N.W.2d 150 Minn. 1976
State, by Burn-quist, v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103
In Re Probate Court, Hennepin County 198 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1972
Balafas v. Angelos 198 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1972
In Re Probate Court, Hennepin County 198 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1972
[3] See, also, State, by Head, v. Paulson, 290 Minn. 371 , State, by Burnquist, v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103
Balafas v. Angelos 198 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1972
See, also, State, by Head, v. Paulson, 290 Minn. 371 , State, by Burnquist, v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103
Shair-A-Plane v. Harrison 189 N.W.2d 25 Minn. 1971
Shair-A-Plane v. Harrison 189 N.W.2d 25 Minn. 1971
Rule 52.01; State, by Burnquist, v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103 , 63 N. W. (2d) 278 .
Bartlett v. Stalker Lake Sportsmen's Club 168 N.W.2d 356 Minn. 1969
Bartlett v. Stalker Lake Sportsmen's Club 168 N.W.2d 356 Minn. 1969
Plaintiffs argue that the conclusion of the trial court on the right of defendants to hunt on the lake in effect overrules State, by Burnquist, v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103 , 63 N. W. (2d) 278 .
State v. Thompson 139 N.W.2d 490 Minn. 1966
State v. Thompson 139 N.W.2d 490 Minn. 1966
The state relies on State, by Burnquist, v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103 , 63 N. W. (2d) 278 , for the proposition that the court will not review objections made for the first time on appeal.
Youngstown Mines Corp. v. Prout 124 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1963
Youngstown Mines Corp. v. Prout 124 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1963
Co. 237 Minn. 332, 342 , 54 N. W. (2d) 912, 918 , wherein this court said: “Whether a body of water is navigable for the purpose of determining title is a federal question, and the federal, not the state, tests of navigability must be applied.” The latest case prior to the Adams case was State, by Burnquist, v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103, 116 , 63 N. W. (2d) 278, 287 , in which we again said: “Navigability for purposes of determining title to water beds is a federal question controlled by the fed
Johnson v. Seifert 100 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1960
Johnson v. Seifert 100 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1960
The trial court cited as authority for its decision Lamprey v. Danz, 86 Minn. 317 , , and State, by Burn *163 quist, v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103 , 63 N. W. (2d) 278 .
First Trust Co. of St. Paul v. McLean 93 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 1958
First Trust Co. of St. Paul v. McLean 93 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 1958
Graphic Arts Educational Foundation, Inc. v. State, 240 Minn. 143 , 59 N. W. (2d) 841 ; State, by Burnquist, v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103 , 63 N. W. (2d) 278 .
Lundin v. Stratmoen 85 N.W.2d 828 Minn. 1957
Lundin v. Stratmoen 85 N.W.2d 828 Minn. 1957
5 State, by Burnquist, v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103, 124 , 63 N. W. (2d) 278, 291 ; Kaehler v. Kaehler, 219 Minn. 536 , 18 N. W. (2d) 312 .
State v. Adams 89 N.W.2d 661 Minn. 1957
Johnson v. Quaal 83 N.W.2d 796 Minn. 1957
State v. Adams 89 N.W.2d 661 Minn. 1957
Rules Of Law Involved In State, by Burnquist, v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103, 109 , 63 N. W. (2d) 278, 283 , we said: “In reviewing findings of fact, the rule in this state prior to the adoption of the new rules of civil procedure has been that the findings must be upheld if they are reasonably sustained in the light of the evidence as a whole.
Johnson v. Quaal 83 N.W.2d 796 Minn. 1957
10 See, State, by Burnquist, v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103 , 63 N. W. (2d) 278 ; Murray v. Wilson, 227 Minn. 365 , 35 N. W. (2d) 521 ; 1 Dunnell, Dig.
Ketterer v. Independent School District No. 1 79 N.W.2d 428 Minn. 1956
Ketterer v. Independent School District No. 1 79 N.W.2d 428 Minn. 1956
See, State, by Burnquist, v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103 , 63 N. W. (2d) 278 ; Wright, Minnesota Rules, pp. 294, 295.
State v. EAH 75 N.W.2d 195 Minn. 1956
State v. E. A. H. 75 N.W.2d 195 Minn. 1956
State v. EAH 75 N.W.2d 195 Minn. 1956
[9] Rule 52.01 of Rules of Civil Procedure; State, by Burnquist, v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103, 109 , 63 N.W.
State v. E. A. H. 75 N.W.2d 195 Minn. 1956
Rule 52.01 of Rules of Civil Procedure; State, by Burnquist, v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103, 109 , 63 N. W. (2d) 278, 283 ; Sommers v. City of St.
Lindahl v. State 70 N.W.2d 866 Minn. 1955
Lindahl v. State 70 N.W.2d 866 Minn. 1955
State, by Burnquist, v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103, 110 , 63 N. W. (2d) 278, 283 ; 2 Youngquist & Blacik, Minnesota Rules Practice, p. 648; Wright, Minnesota Rules, p. 296.
Gamble-Skogmo, Inc. v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. 64 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 1954
Gamble-Skogmo, Inc. v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. 64 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 1954
No action shall lie against the Company unless, as a condition precedent thereto, the Insured shall have fully complied with all of the terms of this Policy , * * 5 Rule 52.01 of Rules of Civil Procedure provides that “Findings of fact shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, * * See, State, by Burnquist v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103 , 63 N. W. (2d) 278 .